Windows Live Users May Be Sharing More Than They Think

There should be an image here!Microsoft may be mining and sharing data it collects from Windows Live users without their knowledge, according to the top story in today’s Windows Secrets Newsletter.

Using addresses pulled from subscribers’ instant messaging and Hotmail Contacts lists, Microsoft takes information from public sources that used to have a very narrow distribution, mashes it together, and sends it out to a wider audience than ever before, in the interest of creating social networks, the story says.

“Social networks are nothing new and subscribers to sites like Facebook and Twitter fully expect their comments and information to be publicly displayed,” said Woody Leonhard, a senior editor for Windows Secrets and writer of this week’s top story. “What Microsoft is doing is taking information that used to be restricted to a very narrow audience — certain blog readers and Live Spaces subscribers, for example — and shooting it out to people you may have never even met — all in an attempt to get a finger in the social networking pie.”

Leonhard states in the article that while Microsoft has not specifically revealed how it obtains its private contact and communication information, his research indicates that the data is collected from users subscribing to Windows Live Messenger and Hotmail. The information is then passed along to other users as a way for them to expand their networks and to obtain status updates from their network members. The information shared could include status posts intended for a small circle of friends or contact list updates that could potentially be embarrassing to unsuspecting users.

“Microsoft has stepped over the line in an attempt to join the social networking space,” said Brian Livingston, editorial director of WindowsSecrets.com. “Sharing with perfect strangers private communications that are intended for a small group is not only ethically questionable but opens the door for legal concerns as well, given that posts and messages intended for a very limited number of people are being displayed for the whole world to see.”

Click here to read the entire story and Microsoft’s response.

Published since 2003, the Windows Secrets Newsletter reveals tricks and workarounds to get the most out of Microsoft Windows. Employing six full-time staff members, WindowsSecrets.com publishes the work of several contributing editors including Fred Langa, Ryan Russell, and Susan Bradley. For more information, visit the WS Lounge at Lounge.WindowsSecrets.com or the newsletter’s home page at WindowsSecrets.com.

[Photo above by Subterranean Tourist Board / CC BY-ND 2.0]

Article Written by

  • Lawrence Hitches

    trying to build up my podcast brand at the moment, its harder these days when there is tons of content out there.

    http://tinyurl.com/3d2jk4m

  • Lawrence Hitches

    trying to build up my podcast brand at the moment, its harder these days when there is tons of content out there.

    http://tinyurl.com/3d2jk4m

  • jared reabow

    as far as i am concerend, branding to me IS of No importance (FOR MOST THINGS)
    It must be said, some things just dont work or arent reliable or a manner of other things because not so much the brand is on it but because the standard that the brand expected is catered too.
    AKA xbox 360 wireless or wired remotes.
    now up untill recently i thought that a cheap one meh, would be fine but i was soo very wrong.
    the sensitivity for one on the cheap remotes is appauling, because of cheap components so it either stop or go, no inbetween when moving the joystick whereas the microsoft one, you can give a nudge a little to the left or rite . now this is not so much about the fact that it says microsoft certified on it or not , its more that Microsoft expect a certain quality for the components, but also other remote like in the uk: dualshock, they produce great controllers at the fraction of the cost of microsoft , but this is because they charge for component price only , not brand

  • jared reabow

    as far as i am concerend, branding to me IS of No importance (FOR MOST THINGS)
    It must be said, some things just dont work or arent reliable or a manner of other things because not so much the brand is on it but because the standard that the brand expected is catered too.
    AKA xbox 360 wireless or wired remotes.
    now up untill recently i thought that a cheap one meh, would be fine but i was soo very wrong.
    the sensitivity for one on the cheap remotes is appauling, because of cheap components so it either stop or go, no inbetween when moving the joystick whereas the microsoft one, you can give a nudge a little to the left or rite . now this is not so much about the fact that it says microsoft certified on it or not , its more that Microsoft expect a certain quality for the components, but also other remote like in the uk: dualshock, they produce great controllers at the fraction of the cost of microsoft , but this is because they charge for component price only , not brand