Working As Intended
- 7
- Add a Comment
- No Related Post
My problem with recommending Windows Vista is that many of its features are considered bugs by a good portion of the community. Doesn’t that say it all? No, this isn’t Windows bashing — it’s the bare-faced truth. Here’s TheDub’s legitimate experience, as emailed to me earlier today:
After using Windows Vista I find it hard to work on Windows XP again… there are just too many things I miss about Vista. I think Vista is a great operating system at heart but, not going to lie, it needs many improvements before it replaces the speed and stability of Windows XP.
I can’t disagree with any part of this statement, but what exactly are we trading speed and stability for? What’s more important than those two items? The true answers to these questions remain elusive. I could recommend that you download a “speed up” utility, but those programs seldom work as advertised (and some of them can actually decrease overall system performance). There really aren’t any Vista-specific tweaking tools out there, sadly — and yes, I already know about TweakVI.
I am having two issues with Windows Vista. One: speed! Windows Vista seems horribly slow especially for me. I am a “power user”; sometimes I am working with many programs at once and many files at once. Vista lags all the time! Another strange thing that I can’t explain is how much it accesses the hard disks. My hard disk is almost always going nuts even when just sitting on the desktop. The noise is not only annoying but my computer is doing something and I have no idea what it is. It is also a performance drag. I have 2 GB of RAM and a 2 GB Flash drive dedicated to ReadyBoost so I don’t think it is paging all the time. Any ideas? Or are there any performance tweaks you would recommend? I have done some research and found that Windows is always making shadow copies of files; disabling that feature really is a performance boost. Also there is the famous ’shut off the indexing service’ to increase speed but I don’t know if that will really help this. Any thoughts you could share with me and the others?
Windows Desktop Search may be the culprit — another “wow” that’s more of a “whoa.” That’s a feature, not a bug. If you want a performance tweak, move back to Windows XP. You’re not going to find massive performance gains with Windows Vista.
If your hard drive is close to full, think about archiving some of the things you don’t need — or buy a second hard drive (for documents, programs, etc.) if you don’t already have one. Telling you to buy a faster hard drive isn’t really a good answer, but it may be the only one (and that, itself, may not solve the problem of Windows Vista thrashing you senseless).
Turn off all your eye candy?
My second issue with Vista is sleep. Windows Vista goes to sleep once… thats it. The second time I shut the screen on my laptop it doesn’t go to sleep, shuts the screen off, and that’s it. I have to power it down with the power button and start it back up to get back to my desktop… this doesn’t seem right at all. Ever heard of this issue?
Join the club. Watch my live stream with any regularity and you’ll see just how flaky Vista’s power management can be — especially in conjunction with USB devices. I wish I was making this up, but I’m not (and neither are you).
It’s much easier to blame the user than the hardware or software, don’t you think?
I am running Windows Vista Ultimate. Maybe my system simply isn’t strong enough for Vista, though I would like to think that is not the case — after all, it came with Home Premium and was stamped “Ultimate Ready.” Its specs include an AMD Turion 64 x2 TL-50 (1.6ghz), 2 GB RAM, ATI Xpress 1150 (this is the weak link in the system, but impressive for integrated graphics), and a 5400 RPM 160 GB HD. I know that 5400 RPM is a slower drive, but it is a laptop computer and it seems most laptops include this speed HD for power and heat issues.
If you’re expecting a portable system to deliver desktop-level performance, you’re… going to be waiting a long time. Sounds like you’re trying to squeeze blood from a stone, and are likely best served by Windows XP on that machine. Sorry.
I’m sure this isn’t what you wanted to hear, but… that’s just the way it is. If anybody recommended Vista over XP in your situation, I’d be surprised. Feel free to read what Tom’s Hardware had to say on the performance differences. You can pore over the entire article, but Tom’s Hardware has an excellent summary between Windows XP and Vista.
[tags]windows vista, windows xp[/tags]

7 Comments
Mike Miller
October 25th, 2007
at 5:49am
I have been reading these artiles or statements about Vista for moinths and find that that has not been my experience. I run Vista with all the “eye candy” and many programs running in the background. For me, it has been significantly faster than XP on the same machine with the same ram, etc. I am very, very happy with Vista and have been since I bought it when it was released. One printer I had since Window 3.1 would not work (no drivers), but the company who manufactured it has not maded printers for the last six years. All the rest of my hardware works great, some even better than under XP. I still have XP on two other machines and will be switching over to Vista soon.
Jerry
October 25th, 2007
at 6:10am
It’s a tantalizing and seductive thing, Windows Vista, and it leaves you out of love forever with Windows XP, while at the same time treating you roughly and disrespectfully and not caring about you at all. Once again I had to reinstall Windows, because the Vista Service Pack 1beta pretty well wrecked me and forced me to reinstall, and this time I was determined to just go back to XP. But then, realizing that it was impossibly hard to migrate all my settings, documents and tweaks from Vista back to XP, I gave up and reinstalled Vista. On balance, I found I was happier with this decision. HOWEVER! it was back to the same old problems — drivers that are supposed to work in Vista but DON’T, program “updates” that collide with Vista in an all-devastating crash, third-party Vista utilities that are useless, futile and inutile, online forum discussions that make me even dumber than I was, Microsoft Knowledge Base articles that are written for Martians, not earthlings, and worst of all, the realization that after a year of fooling with Vista, nobody has a clue yet how to make it work. I have a mental pictures of the software programmers wringing their hands pitifully and occasionally weeping as they try to wade through the totally opaque and heartlessly cruel formality of Microsoft Vista programming documentation. As for the speed issues, getting a dual processor helped a little but not much, and Vista continues to horse-whip my hard drive into a frenzy that never, never stops. What is it doing? Does it do this to Bill Gates, and does he cuss at it and scream, “Why are you doing that? Shut up! Shut up!” Well it’s indexing of course, but what else? Is it still running debugging code surreptitiously? Is it counteracting terrorism? Is it communicating with aliens? I am ready to accept any conspiracy theory now.
hazymorning
October 25th, 2007
at 9:56am
Jerry, I loved your ending on your comment. That was a good laugh, I needed it.
Jon Chorney
October 25th, 2007
at 11:39am
This is particularly well written, Chris - even by your standards. You’ve matched clarity,accuracy and tone to present a fair picture.
I manage 50 workstations and 16 servers. Two of our staff wanted Vista - one a software support person, the other a developer - on their brand new laptops..
The developer will be giving me his computer for downgrading in the next couple of weeks. Vista repeatedly corrupted SQL files, periodically hid a directory (verified by MS Support as a bug), showed network connectivity stability issues, etc.
The support person has reported continuing laptop narcolepsy, despite special help from Dell’s Vista Team and all of our best efforts. Achieving stable connections to either wireless and wired networks can never be taken for granted. I am waiting to hear from her when she wants to downgrade her laptop.
I know of no sales rep who is pushing Vista for their business customers.
In fact, there is a growing consensus that the majority of people who are happy with Vista are home users, while the business world finds it to be a raft of trouble.
I suppose the saddest comment I’ve seen was from someone who called Vista the “new Windows ME.”
Ouch!
Bob
October 25th, 2007
at 1:28pm
Vista kinda reminds me of the toy prize that comes in a box of Cracker Jack,
“During the Depression, the company that made Cracker Jack introduced many new products, although most of them enjoyed only a short period of popularity. New treats included Cracker Jack Cocoanut Corn Brittle and chocolate-covered Cracker Jack.”
Vista…. chocolate-covered XP!
Barneyh8er
October 25th, 2007
at 3:46pm
I notice here that you state that “speed up” utilities seldom work, yet, you recomend tha kind of app 2 sections below.
Hmmmm.
Brian
October 29th, 2007
at 10:53am
I have no major beef about vista for general usage it does what it is supposed to do - with all the candy as long as it does not get stressed.
The major problem as a sailor is that most of the current software for navigation, tactics, communications etc does not work on Vista and the suppliers seem to have no intention of creating a vista compatible software. If XP does disappear in 12 months or so what then?
The odd programme that does “work” supplies some very odd results and collapses very quickly - is that a Vista problem?
All we need is a reliable system as a first
Some strength to keep the major cpu usage functionig and software creators that have a bit more faith than “We currently have no established dates for upgrading to vista”