I Against I In The Social Networking Idiotsphere

Posted by on Jul 27, 2007 | 3 Comments

Interesting. Someone just told me that I was on Pownce – which is odd, because I never signed up for an account. Lo and behold, here “I” am. I’m not terribly upset about it at this point, but that’s pretty much my identity – and the people following “me” may not know that that’s “me” or have no idea who I really am. This is indicative of the problems all these stupid-ass social network sites face:

  • There was no verification that this person, using my name and photo, obviously intending to make people believe that the profile was my own (despite having jumped up and down about how I wasn’t really ready to try Pownce yet), is really me – who he or she claims to be. Why? No, seriously – why? This isn’t *MY* fault – it’s Pownce’s, and it’s not the only social network with this severe identity shortcoming. If this is an identity-oriented service, where the hell is the identity check?
  • Some of these people may think this is really me. It’s not, and if it was – I certainly wouldn’t use that profile picture (taken at the first Linux Desktop event a few years back).
  • Some of these “friends” may have no idea who the hell I am, yet have added me as a friend – which makes little to no sense if this person really isn’t me, or I (not “I”) didn’t initiate the relationship. Sorry, man – that’s not me. You already know where to find me, and it’s not on Pownce at the moment.
  • If someone claimed this profile in my name to reserve it for me, I appreciate the gesture – but please, I really don’t feel comfortable with putting my identity here when it’s already BLATANTLY obvious that the system is just as lousy as every other social network on the planet (in terms of identity and ABSOLUTE BENEFIT to the account holder).
  • One reason I stuck with Twitter is because it’s simple, it lets the world know what I’m up to, and I don’t feel like my identity is getting monetized out the wazoo without proportional benefit.

Sadly, this is an industry-wide problem – not a Pownce-specific one (although it’s making it all too easy to point out the flaws inherent in the entire ecosystem of social networks). Why do I pick to join one network over another? I don’t know. I really don’t know. But I can tell you one thing for sure: I don’t like it when people pretend to be me. Why the hell you’d ever want to pretend to be me is beyond me, but I guess that’s the point?

[tags]social network, social networking[/tags]

  • Harlan Hullinger

    What really stuck out to me visiting you via your link was:

    Join me on Pownce!
    Pownce is a great way to share messages, files, events, and links with your friends.

    The first thought in my head was “hey, they are trying to use Chris’ notoriety to get people to join.” People joining = higher revenue per ad! The few times I have gone to MySpace, the thing I notice is info about the person, not about trying to get someone to sign up.

    If the “pseudo-you” said something liable, how do you prove it was not really you who started the account just to try to get away with slamming someone or someone’s product, etc?

  • Paul Higgins

    Chris, I am amazed at how calmly you seem have taken this. I have said on the Lockergnome website more than once that I take security on the web very seriously, to the point of paranoia. I often receive invitations from people I have never heard of asking me to be their ‘friend’ on these sites. I do not frequent them because of their obvious lack of security. I also do not like them because they aren’t interested in monitoring their sites, they just want to make money from advertising by their huge membership. I always send such unsolicited invitations to them, requesting they investigate who has invited me and why. To me this is every bit as undesirable as ‘phishing’ and ’419′ scams. It is a dangerous premise, and should be discouraged. Anybody who receives one of these invitations should refer them back to the originating site and hopefully they will take note and insist such contacts can only be made through a system that allows the recipient (and perhaps the sender) to remain anonymous. I know it is easy to ignore these invitations, but it is equally easy to ignore ‘phishing’ attempts, but the fact is that they are not ignored and that they continue shows that they are effective. If you wish to invite a friend to one of these sites, surely you can contact them directly?
    Perhaps I am old fashioned and prefer to meet friends the old fashioned way, socialising in the real world and exchanging contact details. That way you can make a judgement about a person based on how they behave, not what they write about themselves. I am particularly concerned about my two children, both young adults (daughter 17 years old, son 15 years old) who have hundreds of contacts on messenger and social networking sites (I insist on monitoring their on-line activity) and they do not know where they live, or who they are aside from the information given on the website. I have explained to them how I could post a picture from the internet on one of these sites and claim to be a 16 year old girl. I did an experiment recently and joined Bebo under four different aliases on the same night, and was not queried about any of them, even though it was done from the same PC within minutes of each other. I know this could be a good thing as it allows personal anonymity, but it also leaves it open to abuse by undesirables. Let the watchword be ‘ Beware’. Many of our young (and older) people have been raised on internet contact, but are not made aware of the inherent dangers. A little more pro-active warning might have been desirable in your otherwise excellent (as most are) communication. Thanks for taking the time to review my comments.

  • http://www.steffennork.de Steffen

    Hmm… is social identity theft the “next big thing”? I wonder if there’s a possibility to make clear if a profile is “real”, e.g. via Open ID.

    Regards from Germany,
    Steffen