Apocalypse 2012
- 4
- Add a Comment
Ponzi and I decided to pick up Apocalypse 2012 (a real book!) this weekend. At first, we took turns reading chapters to one another - but Ponzi’s brain voluntarily dropped out at the halfway point. I continued to read the rest of the book on my own, finishing up around 3AM. I was hoping for a truly scientific approach to these matters, but Joseph couldn’t quite deliver full impartiality. I’m particularly interested in the “facts” on page 114:
The next peak in the planetary tidal force, essentially the sum total of the planets’ gravitational pull on the Sun, will come in late 2012, according to [solid state quantum physicist] Burgess’s calculations. The sunspot maximum, coincidentally also due in that year, will compound the situation, subjecting the Sun to maximum stress. The Sun’s magnetic poles, which reverse every twenty-two years, at the peak of every second cycle, are also expected to switch in 2012, adding further volatility to the situation.The resulting synergy of gravitational and electromagnetic pressure on the Sun cannot help but distort and distend its surface, releasing megabursts of imprisoned radiation, quite possibly ones that are far deadlier than any the Earth has encountered since homo sapiens has been around.
By and large, I found the book a compelling read - but it left too many questions unanswered. Numerically speaking, it’s possible that the “end of the world” will come independent of any actions mankind may take. Will it? Best to be prepared than otherwise.
[tags]2012, apocalypse[/tags]

4 Comments
John Russell
June 27th, 2007
at 6:21am
Chris & Ponzi,
If you found that book an exciting read, you need to buy “The Disappearance of the Universe” by Gary R. Renard. That will get your thinking cap into overdrive!
ENJOY.
John
Rex
June 27th, 2007
at 8:38am
If you really want to know how it is all going to end…
Read the BIBLE!!!!
It tells EXACTLY what is going to happen.
The Old Man
June 27th, 2007
at 10:36am
Do you remember all the hype pre-Y2K? People love this kind of pseudo-scientific speculation. Now we have to hear about 2012 for the next 5 years. Oh well, some will make a few bucks off of it.
Jerry Fletcher
June 27th, 2007
at 5:39pm
Come on Chris, you’re embarrassing yourself. Planetary alignments are a load of hooey. Gravitational force is inversely proportional to the SQUARE of an object’s distance from the target; tidal forces are even weaker, being inversely proportional to the CUBE of the distance.
What’s it mean? Jupiter barely edges out Venus in terms of tidal effect on the Sun. Mercury and the Earth are less than half that strong, and the remaining 5 planets combined barely register at all.
Even if the tidal forces in question weren’t trivial, the idea that they have some kind of mysterious amplifying effect on the completely unrelated 11-year sunspot cycle is preposterous. But then Lawrence has the advantage of hawking his snake oil to a nation of scientific illiterates.