Upgrade To XP Or Wait For Vista?

Posted by on Apr 28, 2006 | 16 Comments

Should those of us on Windows 98 upgrade to XP or wait until next year when Microsoft releases Vista?

Microsoft announced some time ago that it intended to discontinue support and updates to Windows 98, 98SE and Millennium Edition (ME) by June of 2006.

When the original plans were announced, the expectation was that Vista (now scheduled for release at the beginning of 2007) would be released but the repeated delays have created this dilemma for many users.

Discontinued telephone support for these older versions of Windows is much less of a concern than the discontinuing of security updates. Most users don’t call on Microsoft directly when they have a problem, but must look to Redmond for help in plugging holes as they are discovered.

Do you wait to upgrade to Vista and take the risk of any security exploits or upgrade to Windows XP now to avoid that risk and put off upgrading to Vista for a while.

What is best for you depends a great deal upon what you use your system for and how much protection you have in place.

In my opinion, the impending release of Vista in early 2007 (provided there are no more delays!) is not a real factor in the decision for a very simple reason.

Unless you are a bleeding edge user (which is unlikely if you are still running operating systems that date back to 1998) you shouldn’t be in a big hurry to jump into the Vista pool.

Realistically, casual computer users should not be looking at moving to Vista until it has been out for at least a couple of months so that all of the usual kinks, driver and hardware compatibility and application support issues have all been worked out by early adopters. (Remember, pioneers get arrows!)

That means it would be at least a year from now before going to Vista and probably even longer since this is a major update.

The longer you wait to move to Vista, the more others will have taken on the burden of figuring out all of the issues. Having been around for lots of new operating system launches, being conservative is always safer, as long as your computer is capable of providing you with the productivity that you will need.

If you choose to continue running Windows 98 or ME, no one can predict what will happen. You will be in uncharted waters, so be sure to stay connected to trusted technology news sources so you can monitor the discovery of new exploits.

If you continue to use safe computing practices such as updating anti-virus/spyware software, using a hardware router between your computer and the Internet, don’t open file attachments in e-mail or instant messaging, don’t engage in file sharing systems or downloads of unnecessary software (especially “free” software), you have a better chance of avoiding any real issues, but will still be on your own.

You will start to see “Vista Capable” (able to run at the basic level) and “Vista Ready” (optimized for Vista) systems from lots of vendors before June, but the general consensus is that just about any mid-level computer system sold today will be “capable” of running Vista at its basic level.

Vista has some higher level 3D graphics capabilities that will require upgraded video hardware, but will “kick down” to standard video on systems that don’t have newer video processors.

Vista will also be distributed on DVDs so make sure you have a DVD playback drive (a burner is not necessary) and the ability to add upgraded video cards later if you want to buy something now that is “Vista capable” and upgrade it later to “Vista ready.”

[tags]security,data doctors,ken colburn,windows update,vista ready[/tags]

  • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

    How’s the C910 compared to Microsoft Lifecam 1080p? I knew I should had chosen Logitech over Microsoft. (got MS Lifecam 720p)

    • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

      Logitech needs to write better software. Best to avoid until that situation clears up. Can’t say much for Microsoft on the OS X support front, though.

      • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

        So the only downside about Logitech webcams is the software?

        • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

          Uh, yeah. Without that, you’re pretty much sunk.

    • http://twitter.com/FrugalGeek The Frugal Geek

      The Microsoft Lifecam has good response from the Mac community from what I’ve seen (among non-Microsoft haters). The only reason I didn’t really recommend them is from lack of personal experience. Microsoft is known for having pretty decent hardware, though.

      • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

        I was actually wondering how great the quality is offered by the C910 compared to Microsoft Lifecam 1080p :) The Carl Zeiss lenses seem to me a pretty strong point to make the jump to Logitech from Lifecam 720p but I do need advice.

  • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

    How’s the C910 compared to Microsoft Lifecam 1080p? I knew I should had chose Logitech over Microsoft. (got MS Lifecam 720p)

    • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

      Logitech needs to write better software. Best to avoid until that situation clears up. Can’t say much for Microsoft on the OS X support front, though.

      • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

        So the only downside about Logitech webcams is the software?

        • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

          Uh, yeah. Without that, you’re pretty much sunk.

    • http://twitter.com/FrugalGeek The Frugal Geek

      The Microsoft Lifecam has good response from the Mac community from what I’ve seen (among non-Microsoft haters). The only reason I didn’t really recommend them is from lack of personal experience. Microsoft is known for having pretty decent hardware, though.

      • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

        I was actually wondering how great the quality is offered by the C910 compared to Microsoft Lifecam 1080p :) The Carl Zeiss lenses seem to me a pretty strong point to make the jump to Logitech from Lifecam 720p but I do need advice.

  • http://profiles.google.com/techie.geek.girl Tracy Fortune

    Do yourself a huge favour & get a 2mp cam. The image is excellent & considering the cam ought to last a while, a good investment.

    I have a Logitech Quickcam Pro & it is just super. Check user reviews & prices on amazon.com. I never use the included software, btw- Skype & other programs work fine w/o it. I only ever load the driver for cams. FYI.

  • http://jpaularmstrong.blogspot.com Deadheadjpa

    i have used logitech 5000, 9000, and Orbit, all featured the carl zeiss lens and produce sharp cam views with 15-24 fps consistently. The logitech base software is fine, allows for manual adjustments, but logitech insists on pushing it’s “right focus” “right exposure” and “right tracking” auto features, which I suspect is where users have seen the software supporting the logitech hardware veer left. My suggestion is to only install the base driver package and not the full download, uncheck auto updates, and avoid the logitech HD video calling packages, and u should be fine. If for any reason you have a failed install, it is critical that you scrub all remnants of the logiware off your drive, restart and redownload a clean install package, otherwise be prepared to suffer.

  • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

    Yeah, we typically have coupons for anything on http://coupons.lockergnome.com/ (on the average day).