<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Developers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lockergnome.com/web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web</link>
	<description>HTML basics, PHP and MySQL tips, design discussions, Webmaster tool reviews, topical discussions, and a forum spotlight. Perfect for the novice or expert!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Boycott Bing For Being Like Google</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/boycott-bing-for-being-like-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/boycott-bing-for-being-like-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[boycott]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/3336/3598906550/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3394/3598906550_418bef5cf5.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="175" height="109" align="right" /></a>While <a href="http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/boycott-microsoft-bing/">this article</a> from the NY Times is clearly an opinion piece, it speaks with authority against Bing as if they are somehow doing &#8220;worse&#8221; that what Google and Yahoo have done in China.</p>
<p>The short of it is that (without a source, I might add) Bing is allegedly working with Chinese authorities to skew search results. And that Google only censors them. Right, clearly one is worse than the other. News flash - it&#8217;s the Internet, half of the crap here is skewed. And while I detest what the Chinese authorities propagate as &#8220;fact&#8221;, the idea that Microsoft is somehow doing worse that Yahoo or Google in how they present queried results is ludicrous at best.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is all three search engine companies behave horribly in order to gain access to the Chinese populous. So if you are going to boycott one, best do it right and stop using search all together. Because they are all guilty of the same approach as far as i am concerned. But this is just my opinion.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/3336/3598906550/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3394/3598906550_418bef5cf5.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="175" height="109" align="right" /></a>While <a href="http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/boycott-microsoft-bing/">this article</a> from the NY Times is clearly an opinion piece, it speaks with authority against Bing as if they are somehow doing &#8220;worse&#8221; that what Google and Yahoo have done in China.</p>
<p>The short of it is that (without a source, I might add) Bing is allegedly working with Chinese authorities to skew search results. And that Google only censors them. Right, clearly one is worse than the other. News flash - it&#8217;s the Internet, half of the crap here is skewed. And while I detest what the Chinese authorities propagate as &#8220;fact&#8221;, the idea that Microsoft is somehow doing worse that Yahoo or Google in how they present queried results is ludicrous at best.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is all three search engine companies behave horribly in order to gain access to the Chinese populous. So if you are going to boycott one, best do it right and stop using search all together. Because they are all guilty of the same approach as far as i am concerned. But this is just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/boycott-bing-for-being-like-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Still Making Bank</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/mozilla-still-making-bank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/mozilla-still-making-bank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ndevil/3515973540/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3588/3515973540_b8a02623f5.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="157" height="79" align="right" /></a>Despite the onslaught of competition from IE8, Google Chrome and Opera, Mozilla is still doing very nicely with their revenue which in large part comes from AdSense revenue.</p>
<p>This is not to say that all of Mozilla&#8217;s revenue is all coming from Google,<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10401777-264.html"> but it does appear</a> that most of it certainly is. Other sources appear to include Yahoo, Amazon, eBay amongst other sources not listed.</p>
<p>One thing is for sure though. Mozilla is poised for continued profits despite seeing any recent heat from the browser based competition. Call them too well embedded, perhaps there is something to the law of being first and most popular in the open source browser realm. Whatever the reason, both the status and profits for this browser company are going no where.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ndevil/3515973540/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3588/3515973540_b8a02623f5.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="157" height="79" align="right" /></a>Despite the onslaught of competition from IE8, Google Chrome and Opera, Mozilla is still doing very nicely with their revenue which in large part comes from AdSense revenue.</p>
<p>This is not to say that all of Mozilla&#8217;s revenue is all coming from Google,<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10401777-264.html"> but it does appear</a> that most of it certainly is. Other sources appear to include Yahoo, Amazon, eBay amongst other sources not listed.</p>
<p>One thing is for sure though. Mozilla is poised for continued profits despite seeing any recent heat from the browser based competition. Call them too well embedded, perhaps there is something to the law of being first and most popular in the open source browser realm. Whatever the reason, both the status and profits for this browser company are going no where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/mozilla-still-making-bank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter News Via Yahoo?</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/twitter-news-via-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/twitter-news-via-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/livenature/412180053/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/171/412180053_a550681619.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="127" height="95" align="right" /></a>Despite me ripping on Yahoo as of late, I am among the first to admit that Yahoo does news vastly better than Google and Bing. They just do, no contest. I just prefer the way it is presented much better than with the other guys.</p>
<p>Where things get sticky however is the &#8220;news&#8221; of the news now <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/11/19/yahoo-juices-up-its-news-search-with-twitter/">featuring tweets from Twitter</a>. Clever, inventive even&#8230;but where the hell is it? Apparently one must search for a timely topic. So I tried this, nothing - no Twitter options visible on my end?</p>
<p>Missing in action problems aside, the idea does sound intriguing assuming the results are specifically selected separately from the news we already know and love. I&#8217;d even be okay with this as a selected filter. But please, do not mix my Twitter with my news.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/livenature/412180053/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/171/412180053_a550681619.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="127" height="95" align="right" /></a>Despite me ripping on Yahoo as of late, I am among the first to admit that Yahoo does news vastly better than Google and Bing. They just do, no contest. I just prefer the way it is presented much better than with the other guys.</p>
<p>Where things get sticky however is the &#8220;news&#8221; of the news now <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/11/19/yahoo-juices-up-its-news-search-with-twitter/">featuring tweets from Twitter</a>. Clever, inventive even&#8230;but where the hell is it? Apparently one must search for a timely topic. So I tried this, nothing - no Twitter options visible on my end?</p>
<p>Missing in action problems aside, the idea does sound intriguing assuming the results are specifically selected separately from the news we already know and love. I&#8217;d even be okay with this as a selected filter. But please, do not mix my Twitter with my news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/20/twitter-news-via-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdMob Making Big Bucks With Latest Efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/admob-making-big-bucks-with-latest-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/admob-making-big-bucks-with-latest-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[admob]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wapster/718899731/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1353/718899731_9ba34162cd.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="163" height="102" align="right" /></a>There is tremendous speculation that the ad space in the mobile market is where things are at. And be that as it may, most people seem to have a vastly different attitude about advertising on their mobile devices than with their desktop computers.</p>
<p>Basically if the ads are contained within the applications themselves, no one really seems to mind. Just make sure they are not inhibiting the option of enjoying things on the application front.</p>
<p>Well apparently Google has big hopes for <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/09/admob-is-approaching-100-million-in-revenues-google-thinks-it-can-make-it-billions/">one company in this realm</a>, AdMob. And based on what I have been able to see myself, I think they might very well be a wise investment. Remember, advertising is not dead&#8230;it&#8217;s  just evolving.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wapster/718899731/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1353/718899731_9ba34162cd.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="163" height="102" align="right" /></a>There is tremendous speculation that the ad space in the mobile market is where things are at. And be that as it may, most people seem to have a vastly different attitude about advertising on their mobile devices than with their desktop computers.</p>
<p>Basically if the ads are contained within the applications themselves, no one really seems to mind. Just make sure they are not inhibiting the option of enjoying things on the application front.</p>
<p>Well apparently Google has big hopes for <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/09/admob-is-approaching-100-million-in-revenues-google-thinks-it-can-make-it-billions/">one company in this realm</a>, AdMob. And based on what I have been able to see myself, I think they might very well be a wise investment. Remember, advertising is not dead&#8230;it&#8217;s  just evolving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/admob-making-big-bucks-with-latest-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Wi-Fi With Bing?</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/free-wifi-with-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/free-wifi-with-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/topgold/3795847297/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2600/3795847297_6978c96584.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" align="right" /></a>Would you use Bing <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=117007">in exchange for some free Wi-Fi</a>? Honestly, depending on where I was financially, I might. Then again, I suspect some folks will find a way to simply game the system so they can still use Google, but enjoy that free Wi-Fi that Bing is to be offering at select locations.</p>
<p>I will say it is campaigns like this that do not lend any credibility to Bing as a legitimate threat. TV, print and Internet ads, sure. Bribery&#8230; not so much. Then again, some might say Google does the same thing. But I do not know of anything Google is doing like this on this kind of scale.</p>
<p>Frankly, outside of the cheesy factor, I don&#8217;t really see a lot of harm here. Besides, the sad fact of the matter is that people will either choose to use Bing based on its search performance or not. I for one, remain unimpressed and have continued to use Google.</p>
<p>
<!-- FirstRSS + ThunderIT AWS HMAC -->

	<ul>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000UY4MF0/lockergnome'>Securityman ClearCam Wi-Fi Interference-Free Mini Wireless Color Camera Kit with Audio</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002UDGVZS/lockergnome'>2.4GHz Digital Wireless Baby Video Monitor System With Night Vision -- 2.4" Color LCD Screen (100% secure and Wi-Fi Interference Free)</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00125Q77C/lockergnome'>Securityman PalmWatchIII Wi-Fi Interference-Free Wireless Baby Monitoring System with Night Vision, Audio and Video Motion Detections</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0022X2G5U/lockergnome'>Free Wi-fi Inside Decal Sticker Window Sign Business Internet Access</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B001IBHWC4/lockergnome'>Pharos Traveler 117 3G Unlocked Phone with GPS, Turn-by-Turn Voice Guidance, Free Live Traffic, Gas Prices, Movie Times, WVGA Display, Wi-Fi, Stereo Bluetooth, FM Tuner, and 3.1 MP Auto Focus Camera--International Version with Warranty (Black)</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B001OB3KNI/lockergnome'>Autonet Mobile announces holiday pricing of $399 and three months free Internet service.(SERVICES): An article from: Wi-Fi Wireless LAN</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000VXR5S6/lockergnome'>Libraries to offer wi-fi for fee; Free Internet connection rejected by city officials.(City): An article from: Winnipeg Free Press</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000975NLU/lockergnome'>Mobile Wi-Fi VoIP hits New York; free hotspot VoIP hits UK.(United Kingdom)(voice over internet protocol): An article from: European Telecom</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000G6UE2W/lockergnome'>Plantronics Voyager 510 Bluetooth Headset with USB Dock</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00176SQ02/lockergnome'>Sm-8123t Wi-fi(r) Interference-free Wireless Indoor/outdoor Color C</a></li>

	</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/topgold/3795847297/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2600/3795847297_6978c96584.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" align="right" /></a>Would you use Bing <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=117007">in exchange for some free Wi-Fi</a>? Honestly, depending on where I was financially, I might. Then again, I suspect some folks will find a way to simply game the system so they can still use Google, but enjoy that free Wi-Fi that Bing is to be offering at select locations.</p>
<p>I will say it is campaigns like this that do not lend any credibility to Bing as a legitimate threat. TV, print and Internet ads, sure. Bribery&#8230; not so much. Then again, some might say Google does the same thing. But I do not know of anything Google is doing like this on this kind of scale.</p>
<p>Frankly, outside of the cheesy factor, I don&#8217;t really see a lot of harm here. Besides, the sad fact of the matter is that people will either choose to use Bing based on its search performance or not. I for one, remain unimpressed and have continued to use Google.</p>
<p>
<!-- FirstRSS + ThunderIT AWS HMAC -->

	<ul>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000UY4MF0/lockergnome'>Securityman ClearCam Wi-Fi Interference-Free Mini Wireless Color Camera Kit with Audio</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002UDGVZS/lockergnome'>2.4GHz Digital Wireless Baby Video Monitor System With Night Vision -- 2.4" Color LCD Screen (100% secure and Wi-Fi Interference Free)</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00125Q77C/lockergnome'>Securityman PalmWatchIII Wi-Fi Interference-Free Wireless Baby Monitoring System with Night Vision, Audio and Video Motion Detections</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000G6UE2W/lockergnome'>Plantronics Voyager 510 Bluetooth Headset with USB Dock</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B001OB3KNI/lockergnome'>Autonet Mobile announces holiday pricing of $399 and three months free Internet service.(SERVICES): An article from: Wi-Fi Wireless LAN</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000VXR5S6/lockergnome'>Libraries to offer wi-fi for fee; Free Internet connection rejected by city officials.(City): An article from: Winnipeg Free Press</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000975NLU/lockergnome'>Mobile Wi-Fi VoIP hits New York; free hotspot VoIP hits UK.(United Kingdom)(voice over internet protocol): An article from: European Telecom</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0022X2G5U/lockergnome'>Free Wi-fi Inside Decal Sticker Window Sign Business Internet Access</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B001IBHWC4/lockergnome'>Pharos Traveler 117 3G Unlocked Phone with GPS, Turn-by-Turn Voice Guidance, Free Live Traffic, Gas Prices, Movie Times, WVGA Display, Wi-Fi, Stereo Bluetooth, FM Tuner, and 3.1 MP Auto Focus Camera--International Version with Warranty (Black)</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00176SQ02/lockergnome'>Sm-8123t Wi-fi(r) Interference-free Wireless Indoor/outdoor Color C</a></li>

	</ul>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/free-wifi-with-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LinkIn Gets A Twittering</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/linkin-gets-a-twittering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/linkin-gets-a-twittering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/4everyoung/238539492/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/82/238539492_46d555ce38.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="143" height="77" align="right" /></a>So what is with the cooperation <a href="http://blog.linkedin.com/2009/11/09/allen-blue-twitter-and-linkedin-go-together-like-peanut-butter-and-chocolate/">between Twitter and LinkedIn</a>. At its core, it does make sense. After all, both are used for networking and can be used effectively by professionals across the globe. What remains unclear, is just how effective this marriage of the two services can actually be?</p>
<p>Then there is the matter of once again, over-taxing an already double-booked Twitter. As it is today, the service still fails far too often for my taste. Even with recent performance improvements, I think Twitter is still too vunerable to problems for it to be tied into something such as LinkedIn.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, I think that they need to get a handle on their outages, give more resources to the API then let&#8217;s talk about a tie in with services such as LinkedIn. But this is just my perspective, your opinions will likely vary.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/4everyoung/238539492/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/82/238539492_46d555ce38.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="143" height="77" align="right" /></a>So what is with the cooperation <a href="http://blog.linkedin.com/2009/11/09/allen-blue-twitter-and-linkedin-go-together-like-peanut-butter-and-chocolate/">between Twitter and LinkedIn</a>. At its core, it does make sense. After all, both are used for networking and can be used effectively by professionals across the globe. What remains unclear, is just how effective this marriage of the two services can actually be?</p>
<p>Then there is the matter of once again, over-taxing an already double-booked Twitter. As it is today, the service still fails far too often for my taste. Even with recent performance improvements, I think Twitter is still too vunerable to problems for it to be tied into something such as LinkedIn.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, I think that they need to get a handle on their outages, give more resources to the API then let&#8217;s talk about a tie in with services such as LinkedIn. But this is just my perspective, your opinions will likely vary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/09/linkin-gets-a-twittering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spamming Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/spamming-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/spamming-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[legit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[misleading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/88526923@N00/2114874155/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2388/2114874155_b660780928.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="107" height="107" align="right" /></a>Nobody likes Facebook scams. Not one bit. But as you can clearly see <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/01/how-to-spam-facebook-like-a-pro-an-insiders-confession/">from this article</a>, Facebook may not be doing quite enough to help curb the problem. Some might even argue, that Facebook allegedly encourages the behavior of promoting these crazy things!</p>
<p>Then the above linked article makes a fantastic point - Facebook users are not really good for ad placement where a product is being sold. And based on ad research I have done with Facebook myself, I would be inclined to agree.</p>
<p>Thankfully there has been a real push by legitimate advertisers on Facebook recently that is showing signs of potentially overtaking the crap-factor seen in Facebook&#8217;s past. With any luck, this will stick for the mainstay. No matter what though, it is going to pay to keep your eyes peeled</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/88526923@N00/2114874155/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2388/2114874155_b660780928.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="107" height="107" align="right" /></a>Nobody likes Facebook scams. Not one bit. But as you can clearly see <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/01/how-to-spam-facebook-like-a-pro-an-insiders-confession/">from this article</a>, Facebook may not be doing quite enough to help curb the problem. Some might even argue, that Facebook allegedly encourages the behavior of promoting these crazy things!</p>
<p>Then the above linked article makes a fantastic point - Facebook users are not really good for ad placement where a product is being sold. And based on ad research I have done with Facebook myself, I would be inclined to agree.</p>
<p>Thankfully there has been a real push by legitimate advertisers on Facebook recently that is showing signs of potentially overtaking the crap-factor seen in Facebook&#8217;s past. With any luck, this will stick for the mainstay. No matter what though, it is going to pay to keep your eyes peeled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/spamming-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legit Music Alternatives For China</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/legit-music-alternatives-for-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/legit-music-alternatives-for-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Qtrax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/raaphorst/954855299/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1116/954855299_32eb40b8a1.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="181" height="104" align="right" /></a><a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20091102/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_techbit_qtrax_baidu">Based on what I am reading</a>, this could very well be a good thing for the affected Chinese looking to use the Baidu search engine to illegally download music tracks.</p>
<p>The deal being struck with Qtrax looks pretty promising for curbing rampant music piracy. This is not to say that it is going to solve everyone&#8217;s problems with dealing with music piracy, but I think for Baidu it may very well be a solid start.</p>
<p>Further expanding their reach, Qtrax is looking to launching in Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, <span class="yshortcuts">Indonesia</span>, <span class="yshortcuts">Hong Kong</span> and <span class="yshortcuts">Taiwan. This could translate into Qtrax positioning themselves into a real growth position as they enter each individual market.<br />
</span></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/raaphorst/954855299/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1116/954855299_32eb40b8a1.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="181" height="104" align="right" /></a><a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20091102/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_techbit_qtrax_baidu">Based on what I am reading</a>, this could very well be a good thing for the affected Chinese looking to use the Baidu search engine to illegally download music tracks.</p>
<p>The deal being struck with Qtrax looks pretty promising for curbing rampant music piracy. This is not to say that it is going to solve everyone&#8217;s problems with dealing with music piracy, but I think for Baidu it may very well be a solid start.</p>
<p>Further expanding their reach, Qtrax is looking to launching in Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, <span class="yshortcuts">Indonesia</span>, <span class="yshortcuts">Hong Kong</span> and <span class="yshortcuts">Taiwan. This could translate into Qtrax positioning themselves into a real growth position as they enter each individual market.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/legit-music-alternatives-for-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topsy Becoming The New Web Currency</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/topsy-becoming-the-new-web-currency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/topsy-becoming-the-new-web-currency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[retweet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[topsy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisdlugosz/3402955869/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3606/3402955869_5c79c8c7ef.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="205" height="115" align="right" /></a>Generally I am not someone to get too excited about the idea of yet another Web 2.0 company piggybacking on Twitter&#8217;s success. But I am feeling like there may be cause for T<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/03/topsy-twitter-bit-ly-tweetmeme-retweet/">opsy to get a pass on this</a>.</p>
<p>For me personally, I find that Topsy provides an interesting way to track the success of individual articles. I might not be inclined to say that it is the only tool out there anyone should be using, rather something like Twitterurly.</p>
<p>At its core, it is one of those real time search engines. But thanks to its Digg like UI, WordPress retweet badges and ease of use, I find it is not a service to be ignored when you are in the blogging game. Too people using it to ignore it completely.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisdlugosz/3402955869/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3606/3402955869_5c79c8c7ef.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="205" height="115" align="right" /></a>Generally I am not someone to get too excited about the idea of yet another Web 2.0 company piggybacking on Twitter&#8217;s success. But I am feeling like there may be cause for T<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/03/topsy-twitter-bit-ly-tweetmeme-retweet/">opsy to get a pass on this</a>.</p>
<p>For me personally, I find that Topsy provides an interesting way to track the success of individual articles. I might not be inclined to say that it is the only tool out there anyone should be using, rather something like Twitterurly.</p>
<p>At its core, it is one of those real time search engines. But thanks to its Digg like UI, WordPress retweet badges and ease of use, I find it is not a service to be ignored when you are in the blogging game. Too people using it to ignore it completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/11/04/topsy-becoming-the-new-web-currency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing For The Mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/bing-for-the-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/bing-for-the-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[query]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/michperu/4057055697/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3520/4057055697_a9203307f4.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="168" height="117" align="right" /></a>Bing users will be happy to hear that Microsoft has released Bing Mobile for those looking to Bing while on the go. And from the looks of things, <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/10/30/bing-for-mobile-now-live-at-m-bing-com.aspx">it appears that Bing Mobile</a> provides the full functionality of the Bing search engine.</p>
<p>Where Bing really steps it up, is for touch devices. Likely being aimed at the iPhone, Pre and Android, Bing Mobile provides some smooth glide controls for those looking to make their touch experience a bit more fluid.</p>
<p>Where Bing really drops the ball is ticking off folks overseas with yet more USA only Bing applications. This is sad as it is likely there are potentially millions of people overseas who would be thrilled to try Bing Mobile. Too bad it&#8217;s not available to them.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/michperu/4057055697/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3520/4057055697_a9203307f4.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="168" height="117" align="right" /></a>Bing users will be happy to hear that Microsoft has released Bing Mobile for those looking to Bing while on the go. And from the looks of things, <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/10/30/bing-for-mobile-now-live-at-m-bing-com.aspx">it appears that Bing Mobile</a> provides the full functionality of the Bing search engine.</p>
<p>Where Bing really steps it up, is for touch devices. Likely being aimed at the iPhone, Pre and Android, Bing Mobile provides some smooth glide controls for those looking to make their touch experience a bit more fluid.</p>
<p>Where Bing really drops the ball is ticking off folks overseas with yet more USA only Bing applications. This is sad as it is likely there are potentially millions of people overseas who would be thrilled to try Bing Mobile. Too bad it&#8217;s not available to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/bing-for-the-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving At The Speed Of Slow</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/moving-at-the-speed-of-slow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/moving-at-the-speed-of-slow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveward/378148264//"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/140/378148264_9c53d85213.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="154" height="154" align="right" /></a>Apparently, even filling out paperwork is something that takes months for Yahoo! to complete. While <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-and-yahoo-delay-signing-search-deal-2009-10">this article</a> is speculating that it is merely ironing out some details, it is insane to believe that it takes this long!</p>
<p>Further reading shows that apparently, the deal is not likely to be closed before 2010. Seriously, I am sure that Yahoo!&#8217;s shareholders are thrilled to see this deal getting such a high priority. Not.</p>
<p>Allegedly, the rumor is that the two companies are merely looking to get their ducks in a row due to problems with alleged click fraud issues on the Yahoo! side. But those are merely rumors. Yeah, sure&#8230;</p>
<p>
<!-- FirstRSS + ThunderIT AWS HMAC -->

	<ul>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/6130015666/lockergnome'>Internet Fraud: Phishing, Spoofing attack, Pharming, Click fraud, Spyware, Ticket resale, Hushmail, Backscatter (e-mail), Romance scam, Lottery scam, Make Money Fast, Caller ID spoofing</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000FVQHJ2/lockergnome'>Click fraud puts a damper on Web ads: online marketing gains favor despite deceptive practices.(internet fraud): An article from: San Diego Business Journal</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1598291661/lockergnome'>Understanding Click Fraud (Synthesis Lectures on Information Security, Privacy, and Trust)</a></li>

	</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveward/378148264//"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/140/378148264_9c53d85213.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="154" height="154" align="right" /></a>Apparently, even filling out paperwork is something that takes months for Yahoo! to complete. While <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-and-yahoo-delay-signing-search-deal-2009-10">this article</a> is speculating that it is merely ironing out some details, it is insane to believe that it takes this long!</p>
<p>Further reading shows that apparently, the deal is not likely to be closed before 2010. Seriously, I am sure that Yahoo!&#8217;s shareholders are thrilled to see this deal getting such a high priority. Not.</p>
<p>Allegedly, the rumor is that the two companies are merely looking to get their ducks in a row due to problems with alleged click fraud issues on the Yahoo! side. But those are merely rumors. Yeah, sure&#8230;</p>
<p>
<!-- FirstRSS + ThunderIT AWS HMAC -->

	<ul>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/6130015666/lockergnome'>Internet Fraud: Phishing, Spoofing attack, Pharming, Click fraud, Spyware, Ticket resale, Hushmail, Backscatter (e-mail), Romance scam, Lottery scam, Make Money Fast, Caller ID spoofing</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000FVQHJ2/lockergnome'>Click fraud puts a damper on Web ads: online marketing gains favor despite deceptive practices.(internet fraud): An article from: San Diego Business Journal</a></li>
	<li style='margin-bottom:15px'><a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1598291661/lockergnome'>Understanding Click Fraud (Synthesis Lectures on Information Security, Privacy, and Trust)</a></li>

	</ul>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/moving-at-the-speed-of-slow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Success In Media - There Is An App For That</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/success-in-media-there-is-an-app-for-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/success-in-media-there-is-an-app-for-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/merfam/3291803364/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3503/3291803364_c0953bc422.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="110" height="165" align="right" /></a>In today&#8217;s media, two terms that nearly everyone under the age of 35 knows is &#8220;Google it&#8221; and &#8220;There&#8217;s an app for that&#8221;. Apple, being the inventor of the latter saying, has seen amazing success with their iPhone app store. So much in fact, that some are stating that Apple is no longer a computer company. No, they are <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/31/for-the-future-of-the-media-industry-look-in-the-app-store/">becoming a media company</a>.</p>
<p>Where the app store fails for most companies looking to get something distributed is that Apple is not going to be of much help here. They will provide you with a platform and audience, but you will have to do your own promotion. Apple just makes it simple to access.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s imagine that we are talking about those failed brands of media know as newspapers. What if a simple subscription model is provided by the app store for a flat, reasonable monthly fee of $5. Many would avoid it, with more leaping to it like it was providing something life sustaining. Yet much of the mainstream media still does not get this.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/merfam/3291803364/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3503/3291803364_c0953bc422.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="110" height="165" align="right" /></a>In today&#8217;s media, two terms that nearly everyone under the age of 35 knows is &#8220;Google it&#8221; and &#8220;There&#8217;s an app for that&#8221;. Apple, being the inventor of the latter saying, has seen amazing success with their iPhone app store. So much in fact, that some are stating that Apple is no longer a computer company. No, they are <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/31/for-the-future-of-the-media-industry-look-in-the-app-store/">becoming a media company</a>.</p>
<p>Where the app store fails for most companies looking to get something distributed is that Apple is not going to be of much help here. They will provide you with a platform and audience, but you will have to do your own promotion. Apple just makes it simple to access.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s imagine that we are talking about those failed brands of media know as newspapers. What if a simple subscription model is provided by the app store for a flat, reasonable monthly fee of $5. Many would avoid it, with more leaping to it like it was providing something life sustaining. Yet much of the mainstream media still does not get this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/29/success-in-media-there-is-an-app-for-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smart Search Results Please</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/smart-search-results-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/smart-search-results-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bramus/2998573943/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3150/2998573943_0c976b3fed.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="135" height="93" align="right" /></a>Are quality search results just <a href="http://searchengineland.com/the-myth-of-great-search-engine-results-28445">too much to ask for</a>? According to this article, one might easily come to this conclusion sooner rather than later. The problem is despite advancements given, some search engines remains better than others depending on the query.</p>
<p>Even then, those other search engines that provides results from everywhere are not really helping with the information overload. It&#8217;s just too much I am afraid. The sad state of reality is that search has remained entirely too lazy, in my opinions. Even Google, falls into this category to some degree.</p>
<p>Where do we go from here? Human powered indexes and real time results appear to be the future - unfortunately, this is not going to lead to accuracy. No, this will simply continue to lead to more confusion and general frustration.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bramus/2998573943/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3150/2998573943_0c976b3fed.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="135" height="93" align="right" /></a>Are quality search results just <a href="http://searchengineland.com/the-myth-of-great-search-engine-results-28445">too much to ask for</a>? According to this article, one might easily come to this conclusion sooner rather than later. The problem is despite advancements given, some search engines remains better than others depending on the query.</p>
<p>Even then, those other search engines that provides results from everywhere are not really helping with the information overload. It&#8217;s just too much I am afraid. The sad state of reality is that search has remained entirely too lazy, in my opinions. Even Google, falls into this category to some degree.</p>
<p>Where do we go from here? Human powered indexes and real time results appear to be the future - unfortunately, this is not going to lead to accuracy. No, this will simply continue to lead to more confusion and general frustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/smart-search-results-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Time Headaches</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/real-time-headaches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/real-time-headaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveynin/2536574111/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3117/2536574111_205c0acf9e.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="106" height="79" align="right" /></a>Yes, because clearly the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/social-media/6405566/Facebook-public-updates-go-live-on-Bing-within-two-months.html">solution to my search queries</a> are going to come from the mindless updates from Facebook. Really? Is this a worthy addition to Bing&#8217;s otherwise usable search functionality.</p>
<p>I would point out that the same thing applies to Twitter as well. A great way to communicate, but there is no way that I have found ANY data from either source to be good for anything other than the occasional URL discovery. And even that is few and far between.</p>
<p>But this is hardly something that Bing is alone in. Google is also getting their feet wet with this social networking search nonsense. As stated previously, I love social networking. Just don&#8217;t mix it up with relevent search results and we&#8217;ll all get along just great.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveynin/2536574111/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3117/2536574111_205c0acf9e.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="106" height="79" align="right" /></a>Yes, because clearly the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/social-media/6405566/Facebook-public-updates-go-live-on-Bing-within-two-months.html">solution to my search queries</a> are going to come from the mindless updates from Facebook. Really? Is this a worthy addition to Bing&#8217;s otherwise usable search functionality.</p>
<p>I would point out that the same thing applies to Twitter as well. A great way to communicate, but there is no way that I have found ANY data from either source to be good for anything other than the occasional URL discovery. And even that is few and far between.</p>
<p>But this is hardly something that Bing is alone in. Google is also getting their feet wet with this social networking search nonsense. As stated previously, I love social networking. Just don&#8217;t mix it up with relevent search results and we&#8217;ll all get along just great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/real-time-headaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keeping It Simple Google</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/keeping-it-simple-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/keeping-it-simple-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[custom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/extraketchup/894518723/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1162/894518723_e8d263a456.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="151" height="113" align="right" /></a><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10383293-2.html">Is Google losing its simplicity</a>? Sometimes I feel like it might be. After looking into this article about how Google is beginning to feel more like a searchable Wiki rather than a search engine, I cannot help but wonder if they are putting emphasis on stuff that is actually not all that important.</p>
<p>Look, Google offering a new layout is fine. But at the same time, I think Google would be wise to continue using what works. Why start changing things about if it is not needed? This is something that Google might want to start asking themselves as newer UI is often time totally unneeded.</p>
<p>One the other hand, the inclusion of something called structured search might be of some value as Google pushes forward. Anytime you offer more ways to search content, that can be a good thing. But it should be by choice, not being forced upon anyone.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/extraketchup/894518723/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1162/894518723_e8d263a456.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="151" height="113" align="right" /></a><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10383293-2.html">Is Google losing its simplicity</a>? Sometimes I feel like it might be. After looking into this article about how Google is beginning to feel more like a searchable Wiki rather than a search engine, I cannot help but wonder if they are putting emphasis on stuff that is actually not all that important.</p>
<p>Look, Google offering a new layout is fine. But at the same time, I think Google would be wise to continue using what works. Why start changing things about if it is not needed? This is something that Google might want to start asking themselves as newer UI is often time totally unneeded.</p>
<p>One the other hand, the inclusion of something called structured search might be of some value as Google pushes forward. Anytime you offer more ways to search content, that can be a good thing. But it should be by choice, not being forced upon anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/26/keeping-it-simple-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Secure Is Twitter Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/how-secure-is-twitter-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/how-secure-is-twitter-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shawnzlea/2384656420/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2141/2384656420_f66ea56306.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" align="right" /></a>I think that by now, we are fully aware that even protected Tweets, are not all that protected. And as <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/19/the-new-twitter-hole-that-probably-isnt/">this article demonstrates</a>, it sure seems like anything we Tweet these days takes only a small amount of time to become public record.</p>
<p>If anything, the above article should prove to be a reminder that even protected tweets, are easily accessible and that it is never a great idea to announce stuff you would not want visible to the world.</p>
<p>Does this mean we should avoid using Twitter completely? No, not at all. Rather consider the fact that Twitter is a public tool for communication, hence using our best judgment when utilizing such a tool. Really should be a matter of common sense.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shawnzlea/2384656420/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2141/2384656420_f66ea56306.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" align="right" /></a>I think that by now, we are fully aware that even protected Tweets, are not all that protected. And as <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/19/the-new-twitter-hole-that-probably-isnt/">this article demonstrates</a>, it sure seems like anything we Tweet these days takes only a small amount of time to become public record.</p>
<p>If anything, the above article should prove to be a reminder that even protected tweets, are easily accessible and that it is never a great idea to announce stuff you would not want visible to the world.</p>
<p>Does this mean we should avoid using Twitter completely? No, not at all. Rather consider the fact that Twitter is a public tool for communication, hence using our best judgment when utilizing such a tool. Really should be a matter of common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/how-secure-is-twitter-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsapapers Get Their Format In Order</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/newsapapers-get-their-format-in-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/newsapapers-get-their-format-in-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/inju/112082907/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/37/112082907_8c282f0761.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="140" height="105" align="right" /></a>With newspapers continuing to swirl around the proverbial toilet financially, making sure that they are able to compete in the online space is no longer a nice idea - it&#8217;s critical.</p>
<p>As news came down the line of <a href="http://townnews.com/articles/2009/10/23/press_release/doc4adc780ca9a49642888412.txt">TownNews adopting the hnews format</a>, I suddenly found myself wondering why this matters to the reader? Looking into the matter a bit deeper, I found that in truth, all that is being offered is a consistent read. Little more than that.</p>
<p>Yes, it means very little to the reader. But it matters to the publisher as this translates into seeking to meet with open standards, which in the end is actually good for everyone. And with TownNews supporting the online operations for something like 1500 newspapers online, standards are becoming increasingly important in this highly competitive environment.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/inju/112082907/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/37/112082907_8c282f0761.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="140" height="105" align="right" /></a>With newspapers continuing to swirl around the proverbial toilet financially, making sure that they are able to compete in the online space is no longer a nice idea - it&#8217;s critical.</p>
<p>As news came down the line of <a href="http://townnews.com/articles/2009/10/23/press_release/doc4adc780ca9a49642888412.txt">TownNews adopting the hnews format</a>, I suddenly found myself wondering why this matters to the reader? Looking into the matter a bit deeper, I found that in truth, all that is being offered is a consistent read. Little more than that.</p>
<p>Yes, it means very little to the reader. But it matters to the publisher as this translates into seeking to meet with open standards, which in the end is actually good for everyone. And with TownNews supporting the online operations for something like 1500 newspapers online, standards are becoming increasingly important in this highly competitive environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/newsapapers-get-their-format-in-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Not Focused On The Money</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/twitter-not-focused-on-the-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/twitter-not-focused-on-the-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/7son75/2573812829/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3068/2573812829_5d809a2ab1.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" align="right" /></a>Clearly it&#8217;s a good time to be a Web 2.0 CEO. While countless others deal with not being able to make money due to hurdles with the economy, others such as Twitter&#8217;s CEO <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/live-twitter-ceo-evan-williams-at-web-20-summit-2009-10">seems completely disinterested</a> with the idea of making up a sustainable fund to keep their company in the black.</p>
<p>Clearly living on kool-aid and VC money has gotten to Twitter&#8217;s head. Sure, I fully realize that they are waiting for some larger company to sweep in and buy them out. But one must ask themselves what kind of business is that? A sell out kind? Yup, pretty much.</p>
<p>Twitter is holding off for the big money. Obviously learning nothing from the dotCom crash, they are perfectly content to sit around and ignore any sustainable business ideas in hopes of being bought out for as much as possible. No interest in selling out to Facebook, clearly they are waiting for Google or Microsoft.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/7son75/2573812829/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3068/2573812829_5d809a2ab1.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" align="right" /></a>Clearly it&#8217;s a good time to be a Web 2.0 CEO. While countless others deal with not being able to make money due to hurdles with the economy, others such as Twitter&#8217;s CEO <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/live-twitter-ceo-evan-williams-at-web-20-summit-2009-10">seems completely disinterested</a> with the idea of making up a sustainable fund to keep their company in the black.</p>
<p>Clearly living on kool-aid and VC money has gotten to Twitter&#8217;s head. Sure, I fully realize that they are waiting for some larger company to sweep in and buy them out. But one must ask themselves what kind of business is that? A sell out kind? Yup, pretty much.</p>
<p>Twitter is holding off for the big money. Obviously learning nothing from the dotCom crash, they are perfectly content to sit around and ignore any sustainable business ideas in hopes of being bought out for as much as possible. No interest in selling out to Facebook, clearly they are waiting for Google or Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/20/twitter-not-focused-on-the-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waving At Google Wave From The iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/19/waving-at-google-wave-from-the-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/19/waving-at-google-wave-from-the-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/66568868@N00/4005351165/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3508/4005351165_4ca4b40c47.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="131" height="131" align="right" /></a>Hate it or love it, Google Wave is here to stay. And as I read in <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/13/google-waves-little-secret-it-already-works-on-the-iphone/">this piece from TechCrunch</a>, it appears that we are looking at Google Wave working pretty well with the iPhone.</p>
<p>What is interesting about this is that there is a warning that appears when trying to use Google Wave on the iPhone, stating that the browser was not setup for it. Despite this, I believe we will see more mobile users jumping on board with this as time goes on.</p>
<p>In the end, it seems like the biggest target for Google Wave on the mobile front appears to be related to the iPhone specifically. And why not, considering the sheer number of users available able to run what the software provides.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/66568868@N00/4005351165/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3508/4005351165_4ca4b40c47.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="131" height="131" align="right" /></a>Hate it or love it, Google Wave is here to stay. And as I read in <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/13/google-waves-little-secret-it-already-works-on-the-iphone/">this piece from TechCrunch</a>, it appears that we are looking at Google Wave working pretty well with the iPhone.</p>
<p>What is interesting about this is that there is a warning that appears when trying to use Google Wave on the iPhone, stating that the browser was not setup for it. Despite this, I believe we will see more mobile users jumping on board with this as time goes on.</p>
<p>In the end, it seems like the biggest target for Google Wave on the mobile front appears to be related to the iPhone specifically. And why not, considering the sheer number of users available able to run what the software provides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/19/waving-at-google-wave-from-the-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola On Android</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/19/motorola-on-android/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/19/motorola-on-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[open]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/web/?p=4677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/secretlondon/2980074078/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3254/2980074078_9d92b7f984.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="82" height="110" align="right" /></a>In many ways, I see Moto going with Android as the only way they are going to remain within the market with the wars raging on with other smart phones. With the combined action of the iPhone, Palm Pre and Android on other handsets, Moto clearly is choosing the mobile platform that is open enough to allow them <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/10/motorola_is_trying_to_get.html">a chance to participate</a>.</p>
<p>What remains largely unclear though, is whether or not Moto is too late to the table. Some might say they are, as only the likes of Nokia could drag their feet this long and still come out on top.</p>
<p>No matter how all of this breaks down, I think it is safe to point out that Moto realizes that in order to compete in an iPhone kind of world, embracing open source options like Android is about the only hope they have to not become a second class solution in this ever-changing mobile market.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/secretlondon/2980074078/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3254/2980074078_9d92b7f984.jpg" border="0" alt="There should be an image here!" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="82" height="110" align="right" /></a>In many ways, I see Moto going with Android as the only way they are going to remain within the market with the wars raging on with other smart phones. With the combined action of the iPhone, Palm Pre and Android on other handsets, Moto clearly is choosing the mobile platform that is open enough to allow them <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/10/motorola_is_trying_to_get.html">a chance to participate</a>.</p>
<p>What remains largely unclear though, is whether or not Moto is too late to the table. Some might say they are, as only the likes of Nokia could drag their feet this long and still come out on top.</p>
<p>No matter how all of this breaks down, I think it is safe to point out that Moto realizes that in order to compete in an iPhone kind of world, embracing open source options like Android is about the only hope they have to not become a second class solution in this ever-changing mobile market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockergnome.com/web/2009/10/19/motorola-on-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	  <item> 
  <title>How to Handle Remote Tech Support</title>
  <description>
  &lt;em&gt;Using &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gotoassist.com/chris&quot;&gt;GoToAssist&lt;/a&gt; is the easiest way to view and control another person's computer online. Use it to provide instant technical support to family, friends and customers. Start a session with just one click, and instantly connect with the other party. &lt;/em&gt;
  </description>
  <author>chris@lockergnome.com (Chris Pirillo)</author>
  <category>Partner</category>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <link>http://gotoassist.com/chris/</link>
  <guid>http://gotoassist.com/chris/</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
  <title>Network Tools for Windows</title>
  <description>You need these network tools, no matter which operating systems and networks you have to support. &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.solarwinds.com/updates/New-Customer.cfm?ProdID=568&amp;campaign=ipmon_DL_lockergnome&amp;CMP=BAC-ipmonDL_lockergnome&quot;&gt;SolarWinds ipMonitor&lt;/a&gt;: Affordable Network Monitoring for SMBs. Get turnkey network, server and application availability monitoring with SolarWinds ipMonitor v9.0. This easy-to-use, reliable solution for SMBs delivers out-of-the-box availability monitoring so you always know exactly what's up with Active Directory, DNS, Exchange, FTP, Web, IMAP, MS SQL Server, and SMTP. &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.solarwinds.com/updates/New-Customer.cfm?ProdID=568&amp;campaign=ipmon_DL_lockergnome&amp;CMP=BAC-ipmonDL_lockergnome&quot;&gt;Download your free trial today&lt;/a&gt;. Or, try their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.solarwinds.com/products/freetools/&quot;&gt;totally free tools&lt;/a&gt;! And, through 2/29, save 20% when you purchase &lt;a href=&quot;http://store.solarwinds.com/s.nl/sc.16/.f&quot;&gt;ipMonitor 9.0&lt;/a&gt;.
  </description>
  <author>chris@lockergnome.com (Chris Pirillo)</author>
  <category>Partner</category>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <link>http://support.solarwinds.com/updates/New-Customer.cfm?ProdID=568&amp;campaign=ipmon_DL_lockergnome&amp;CMP=BAC-ipmonDL_lockergnome</link>
  <guid>http://support.solarwinds.com/updates/New-Customer.cfm?ProdID=568&amp;campaign=ipmon_DL_lockergnome&amp;CMP=BAC-ipmonDL_lockergnome</guid>
  </item>
  
  <item>
  <title>Get Your Own Web Site</title>
  <description>Starting at just $3.99/month, web hosting from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/default.asp?isc=cp2&quot;&gt;GoDaddy&lt;/a&gt; includes 99.9% uptime, 24/7 support and free access to GoDaddy Hosting Connection, THE place to install over 30 FREE applications sure to help you get the most from your hosting plan and Web site. Enter &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/default.asp?isc=cp2&quot;&gt;code CP2&lt;/a&gt; at checkout, and save an additional 10% on any order.
  &lt;p&gt;Plus, as a friend of Chris Pirillo, enter code &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/default.asp?isc=chris7&quot;&gt;CHRIS7&lt;/a&gt;, that's C-H-R-I-S and the number 7, when you check out, and save an additional 10% on any order. Get your piece of the internet at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/default.asp?isc=chris7&quot;&gt;GoDaddy.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
  </description>
  <author>chris@lockergnome.com (Chris Pirillo)</author>
  <category>Partner</category>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <link>http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/default.asp?isc=cp1</link>
  <guid>http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/default.asp?isc=cp1</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
  <title>VMware and Parallels for Virtual Machines</title>
  <description>
  It doesn't matter if you're running on Windows or Mac OS X - every power user needs either &lt;a href=&quot;http://send.onenetworkdirect.net/z/13766/rn_a32755/&quot;&gt;Parallels&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://send.onenetworkdirect.net/z/17081/rn_a32755/&quot;&gt;VMware&lt;/a&gt; (or both). There's never been an easier way to test software without destroying your primary operating system's stability. Think of how many times you wish you could press a 'reverse' button on your computer. Plus, there's no easier way to try new Linux distributions - see what all the fuss is about. Run Windows in OS X, run Linux in Windows, but the best way to do either is with &lt;a href=&quot;http://send.onenetworkdirect.net/z/17081/rn_a32755/&quot;&gt;VMware&lt;/a&gt; and/or &lt;a href=&quot;http://send.onenetworkdirect.net/z/13766/rn_a32755/&quot;&gt;Parallels&lt;/a&gt;.
  </description>
  <author>chris@lockergnome.com (Chris Pirillo)</author>
  <category>Partner</category>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <link>http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/19/parallels-or-vmware/</link>
  <guid>http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/19/parallels-or-vmware/</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
  <title>Coupons for Online Shopping</title>
  <description>&lt;p style=&quot;color: red&quot;&gt;This feed is fueled by Lockergnome &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lockergnome.com/buy/&quot;&gt;Online Shopping and Coupon Codes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
 Before you shop next time, see if we have &lt;a href=&quot;http://coupons.lockergnome.com/&quot;&gt;a coupon&lt;/a&gt; first.
&lt;/p&gt;
  </description> 
  <author>chris@lockergnome.com (Chris Pirillo)</author> 
  <category>Partner</category> 
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:56:13 GMT</pubDate>
  <link>http://coupons.lockergnome.com/</link> 
  <guid>http://coupons.lockergnome.com/</guid>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
