Google Street View Continues To Raise Privacy Concerns

Google Street View, a Google Maps feature that lets users see images of streets and the surrounding areas, continues to generate controversy. Since its launch in May 2007, the feature has prompted questions about whether it constitutes an invasion of privacy, complaints about inappropriate images, and even a lawsuit.

Aaron and Christine Boring vs. Google

The lawsuit came from a Pittsburgh couple in April 2008. The couple lives on a private road. However, Google’s Street View team traveled down the road and continued taking images all the way up to the couple’s home. The images were then posted to Google Maps and included close-ups of the couple’s home, swimming pool, and outbuildings.

Google’s response? “Complete privacy does not exist in this world except in a desert, and anyone who is not a hermit must expect and endure the ordinary incidents of the community life of which he (or she) is a part (1).”

While Google’s assertion that its Street View imaging team is an “ordinary incident of community life” is far-fetched, Google does make some good points in its response. Namely, that the plaintiffs could have simply requested that Google remove the offending images from Street View via a form available on Google Maps. Instead, the couple filed suit and in doing so have made the matter public record and ensured that the images will be viewed by even more people.

Since the lawsuit, Google has removed the images in question, but the suit remains open.

The Borings’ Neighbors

On Goldenbrook Lane, a nearby street, some of the Borings’ neighbors also had an incident with the Street View team. In this incident, the Street View team drove up Goldenbrook Lane and into the driveway of the McKee residence. They continued to drive, snapping Street View images the whole way, up to the garages of the McKees (2). While it appears that the McKees didn’t resort to a lawsuit, Google has removed the images of the home that were taken from private property from Street View.

Street View in California

In California, the antics of the Street View drivers continued. Drivers reportedly went on over 100 private roads in Sonoma County according to an analysis done by PressDemocrat.com. In another instance, Street View drivers went past two no trespassing signs as they photographed the 1,200 foot private road leading up to Betty Webb’s house in Humboldt County. In another incident reported by PressDemocrat.com, Street View drivers ignored a no trespassing sign, passed through a gate, and drove through someone’s yard on a dirt road near Freestone.

Street View and U.S. Military Bases

In March 2008, the Pentagon requested that Google remove some images of military bases taken from public streets due to the potential threat those images posed to national security. “It actually shows where all the guards are. It shows how the barriers go up and down. It shows how to get in and out of buildings,” said General Gene Renuart, commander of U.S. Northern Command (3). According to Google spokesman Larry Yu, Google has honored the Pentagon’s requests (4). However, the Pentagon was still reviewing the many images of military facilities that were included in Street View (5).

Street View Goes Global

After the complaints in the U.S., other countries warned Google that Street View would have to be modified to comply with their stricter privacy laws. To this end, Google has improved facial recognition technology so that it can find faces in images and blur them so that they are unrecognizable. This technology has also been applied to license plates. The blurring feature has since been applied to U.S. Street View imagery in addition to images in other countries where Street View is now available.

Accountability

While Google has removed some of the aforementioned locations from Street View, the burden to monitor Google’s actions, be it Street View or other Google services, continues to fall on people like you and me. With regard to Street View, Google argues that “many people — visitors pulling in the driveway, neighbors turning around at the end of the road, deliverymen delivering packages — can all plainly see the exterior of the (Borings) home (6).” While these examples are likely accurate for the Borings and the population in general, they involve people that we know or strangers that we requested to come to our homes. Private residents didn’t request that Google visit these neighborhoods nor would residents reasonably expect that someone would be driving down their streets taking photographs of everything. In fact, I suspect that if you or I were to do the same thing, someone would call the police and we’d have some difficult questions to answer down at the station.

Potential Consequences

So, what could the consequences of Street View be? Well, while the feature has been used to aid police in a kidnapping investigation (7), I think the feature could be far more useful to criminals. For example, a criminal could use Street View to case a neighborhood — checking Street View for cars that are parked in garages or driveways so they could know when someone isn’t at home, scan the yards and windows for any signs indicating that homes have security systems, check the proximity of neighboring houses using Street View and Google’s satellite imagery, look for signs of pets that could pose problems for a thief, see if the homes have newspapers delivered (which might help the thief determine if the residents were on vacation) and, assuming the criminal found a good candidate, select a few potential access points (like open windows) for breaking into the home. If the Street View car happened to pass through your neighborhood on garbage day, the camera might even capture the box of that new HDTV you got. Scary, huh?

Protecting Your Privacy

So how can you protect yourself? First, check your address using Street View. To report a concern with Street View imagery, enter the address you desire and click “Search Maps.” Then, click “Street View” in the thought bubble that appears on the map. Once the “Street View” image appears, click “Report a Concern” in the bottom left corner of the Street View image and enter the details of your complaint.

Second, be mindful of how your information is used and act when you feel your privacy is being threatened. Google’s Street View can be a helpful tool, but it is meant to help Google sell ads and make money, not protect your privacy. You can write your local, state and federal representatives and even the local paper to voice your opinion.

Oh, and if you believe as Google does that “complete privacy does not exist,” then you should check out the house where Google CEO Eric Schmidt reportedly lives using satellite imagery from Google Maps. It looks like he has had some construction done in the past few years. A simple Google search of the address (366 Walsh Road, Atherton, CA) will tell you that Schmidt merged two adjacent lots in 2001 (8) to create the new lot and then added a new fence, retaining wall, and drainage in 2004 (9). Eric, that creepiness that you’re feeling is probably approaching the level of the people who had Street View vehicles in their driveways. So, while it is Google’s mission to “organize the world’s information and make it accessible and useful,” the company should thoroughly consider how that information can adversely impact the same people it is meant to help.

Sources

  1. Preliminary Statement.” Boring vs. Google, Allegheny County, PA
  2. TheSmokingGun.com “Google is in Your Driveway!”
  3. Reuters. “Google pulls some map images at Pentagon’s request.” Mar. 6, 2008.
  4. Ibid
  5. Ibid
  6. Preliminary Statement.” Boring vs. Google, Allegheny County, PA
  7. Telegraph.co.uk. “US police use Google Street View to find missing child.” Jan. 9, 2009
  8. Town of Atherton City Council Minutes, May 16, 2001.
  9. Palo Alto Online, September 24, 2001.

(C) Medium Blue 2009

About the Author

Brian Cooper is the Director of Online Public Relations at Medium Blue, where he promotes the company’s clients on the Internet. He has a bachelor’s degree in marketing and a MBA in management from Georgia State University where he graduated summa cum laude. His articles have been published on numerous Web sites, including The American Chronicle, IM Newswatch, IT Business Net, Search Engine Guide, SEO News, Site Pro News, and TechLINKS. Medium Blue Search Engine Marketing was named the number one organic search engine optimization company in the world by PromotionWorld in 2006 and 2007.

[rsslist:http://shop.tagjag.com/google+maps]

Article Written by

  • Eric L.

    The only true privacy that can be expected to some degree is what goes on inside ones home, and even that can and has been improvised by the US and Local Government.

    If your going to walk around your property naked, pick your nose, masturbate, or have sex outside your house, one must suspect that someone could be watching, from either the property line, over a fence, from flying over in a plane, or even from a Satellite.

    So if your going to be doing something that you feel you wouldn’t like the world to know about than you should do it behind closed doors/inside a dwelling of some sort.

    As Google pointed out if you find pics of your property that you don’t approve of, then all it takes is a form being filed out and they will gladly remove them.

    My opinion of doing any of the above outside on my property is… If you want to watch, go ahead…. If it offends you in some way, you have the right not to look and turn your head. If Google wants to take pictures and people want to watch…. All the power to them. I hope they enjoyed the show.

    —Eric

  • http://pocketpiglets.com Joe Smith

    Google’s street view an satellite view.
    Impression 1: Oh cool, you can see my pool and trampoline.
    Impression 2: I’m scared.

  • http://pwrscan.com Charles Yin

    I would suppose it would be good…maybe

  • http://www.tarkar.com Chirag Tarkar

    We are a firm based in India that provides web designing, web programming, Data entry, web

    hosting and domain names. That doesn’t matter what the website is, we have expert resources

    all of the following categories; Photoshop, Flash, HTML, PHP, dot Net, CSS, JavaScript, My SQL,

    Shopping Carts and more. If you are looking to have a website redesigned, maintained or

    designed from scratch, we can provide you. In this period of recession we can understand the

    budget of the clients and our rates are affordable in this recession period.
    +91 9726888111

  • Desktop_Ron

    I’m a firm believer in all the privacy I can maintain, but according to most law in the United States, at least, anything visible from a public street can be photographed without further permission required. There are two exceptions that I know of: one is a posted government site for security reasons. The other seems to have been violated sometimes by Google, as you must be on a public road or public land, like a public park. Private roads can not be used, whether posted or not.

    Regarding this “In fact, I suspect that if you or I were to do the same thing, someone would call the police and we’d have some difficult questions to answer down at the station.” A lot of police do not understand this, but you can do exactly as hypothesized and it will be entirely legal as long as you are on a public road.
    A few good starting points for discussion of these rights:
    http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm, http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-08-11-photography-rights_x.htm and http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2005/08/rights.html and an older, but very relavent thread http://www.photosig.com/go/forums/read?id=206320

  • Jonathan

    What do I think?

    I think Eric L. needs to learn the difference between “your” and “you’re” and that Chirag Tarkar shouldn’t be using this forum to spam.

    Beyond that, Google should not be trespassing on private property nor ignoring reasonable allowances people make for their privacy.

    To the nincompoop who stated: “Complete privacy does not exist in this world except in a desert, and anyone who is not a hermit must expect and endure the ordinary incidents of the community life of which he (or she) is a part.”, pull your head out of your backside and wake up to the fact that just because you can drive somewhere and take a picture does not mean you should.

    Common sense should tell you that if someone has a sign posted that indicates “no trespassing” or “private” that you and anyone who works for you should keep out. Your status as a world-class search provider does not grant you immunity from arrest and or the possibility of making the acquaintance of a shotgun.

    Privacy may not mean much to you, but to many people in the United States, it is still a much cherished part of their rights as an American citizen.

  • Smarty pants

    Well by the first amendment I can take a picture of anyone I feel like it, and there isn’t a think anyone can do about it. The twisted thing is it can go as far as someone putting a camera at the end of a staircase and take video or pictures of a female’s underside with out her permission and /or knowledge, but if its a miner that’s a different story. so the point being is that privacy is a myth.

    Another thing its not true that a criminal can use it to find out if your home of not because those photos are taken once and it would more likely be years before they do it again and the air photos are refreshed like every month or so (i don’t keep track) and that doesn’t have much detail. anyways any info he can see in the photo has changed by now besides its no different than walking or driving by and taking photographs to decide robbery.

  • R Kola

    Anyone worrying about the view from a public street and then feigning indignation while pretending to be a crusader for privacy, freedom and democracy needs to be asked what is their REAL motivation for writing such a one sided article.

    Does the “crusader” have business ties with or receive compensation benefits from Microsoft or any of Google’s competitors?