Network World Takes A Balanced View

Love it? Hate it? Not yet sure?

I have not visited the Network World pages for some time, instead relying on the print copy to glean information. This morning I popped over to see an article that I had not seen, speaking about something I haven’t seen addressed in other magazines, whether the print or ‘net variety.

The article addresses the really big problem that Microsoft has with adoption of Windows 7; will the happy, and numerous, XP users want to switch?

The Windows 7 pitch, to date, takes direct aim at Vista’s reputation as a bloated resource hog. As developers and members of the general public begin to tinker with the Windows 7 public beta, Microsoft is framing it as a lean and lithe OS, with the flexibility to run on all types of computers, from netbooks to high-end gaming laptops.

OK, so far. This sounds right. It is leaner, at least in memory load, on disk, not so much (but most don’t care about this, disk space is cheap, and only the most crusty will complain about it)

The new and streamlined user interface features of Windows 7 are well-documented at this point. A cleaned-up taskbar, the sleek Aero Peek GUI, mouse-hover Jump Lists and multi-touch capability have generated interest from users whose Windows desktops have been cluttered for too long.

I certainly know about this, but I’ve never had more than 9 icons on my desktop at one time. I teach people this. It goes back to Win 9x and the 3 64K heaps (if you don’t understand, ask someone who fought with Windows until NT – but for most, it was Windows 2000).

Microsoft hopes that the release of Windows 7 will solve problems ranging from desktop clutter to what Vista did to Microsoft’s public reputation. But the toughest challenge may be to win over the group of people that arguably represent the software giant’s biggest obstacle to success: Windows XP users.

Windows XP is a great product. When looking forward, since the promises of Gates and Company were broken – one by one – during the development of Vista, most wanted Vista, as shipped, and now, after a second disappointment, Windows 7, to simply be a Windows XP with the last few warts removed.

Quicker, easier, more organized. Those were the buzzwords about Windows 7 features that Parri Munsell, Microsoft’s Director of Consumer Product Management for Windows, used repeatedly in a recent interview from CES (Consumer Electronics Show) in Las Vegas.

In some ways, yes, but to remove the drill-down, easily changed, hierarchical menus of Windows 95 through XP is sheer madness.

“Our goal was to make the UI in Windows 7 much easier to navigate. We’ll let the beta speak for itself but we have a high degree of optimism in it,” Munsell says.

This seems well received by the younger set, or those who don’t use their machines to get real work done daily, with deadlines. Those who have those restraints, and long time users, hate the removal of the primary way to bring order to a computer with many program packages installed.

As for fastest growing segment of the PC market, netbooks, Munsell says that Microsoft has made it a priority to run Windows 7 on small form-factor notebooks.

I can see this, and since Microsoft has never been afraid of multiple SKUs before, why not have this revision, without the standard menus, as Windows 7 for Netbooks,  or Windows 7 On the Go. (Anything but the Lite designation,; that would be a kiss of death.)

“Windows 7 has been optimized and engineered to work with anything: from the smallest netbook to the most loaded laptop or desktop,” he says.

Not without the standard menu it isn’t! The thing about this is, I haven’t heard one reason why this was removed. I can only assume it is some capricious effort on Microsoft’s part. In any case, it is making many users want to wait for the next Windows version, and the return of working to please the customer base, at Microsoft. Also, by Microsoft’s own decree, they have time – support continues through 2014.

A lot is expected of Windows 7, but can it do what at times has seemed impossible-win back the trust of XP users who have shunned Vista?

The software giant has stated outright that Windows 7 will not make significant architectural changes from Vista and will run most if not all the applications that run on Vista.

Yet just 21 percent of Windows users currently run Vista, according to Web metrics company Net Applications. Most Windows users (65 percent) still run XP; they like it and they are wary of the compatibility issues that have plagued Vista.

To almost every person I speak with, the problems are boiled down to the seeming need of Microsoft to change what works well, for no apparent reasons, and with no explanations, or apologies.

It’s All About the Third-Party Apps
Want to compare network applications products? View our IT Product Guides now.

That wariness is not without cause, analysts say. Even though Microsoft is trying to use Windows 7 to move XP customers forward, it’s still a Vista-like operating system and will have the same compatibility problems that are part of any OS upgrade, says Al Gillen, Research Vice President, System Software at IDC .

“If you don’t run Vista today, Windows 7 will not be a silver bullet,” he says. Ultimately, Gillen adds, it’s not the operating system that matters as much as having updated third-party applications.

“Whether they are upgrading to Vista or Windows 7, XP users have to make sure third-party applications are compatible,” he says.

Microsoft has warned users of the dangers of skipping versions of Windows entirely and has been trying to wean users off Windows XP through downgrade fees. Its success has been limited however as the Vista stigma lingers.

Microsoft’s Munsell urges XP users to evaluate which third-party applications are important and make sure there is vendor support.

“It is important to avoid a situation where your critical application is no longer supported on Windows XP while not yet supported on Windows 7,” Munsell says.

Transition to Windows 7 Easier?

Not so far. Once again, Microsoft, and specifically Steve Ballmer, cannot be taken at their word. Large amounts of copy have been used to explain that the driver model, and therefore applications, would stay the same as Vista. As I have already proven with video drivers, it just is not true. Also, other small changes are rendering other peripherals useless with Windows 7. So I ask, ‘Why pretend to be compatible at all? Why not just break everything, and be honest, giving us (possibly) a better operating system?’

Though the transition from XP to Windows 7 will be complex, it should be simpler as compared to the early days of Vista, says Michael Cherry, lead analyst with market researcher Directions on Microsoft.

When Windows Vista first shipped, Cherry says, people were not prepared for the application and hardware compatibility problems that came with an OS so different from XP.

“At this point there should be compatible versions of most applications and, when necessary, virtualization can be used to facilitate the upgrade,” Cherry says.

“This is not to say that XP apps and drivers will work on Windows 7, but that there are now compatible replacements available, which should make the transition manageable.”

If Microsoft wants to move customers forward with Windows 7, it must help XP users bridge the gap as much as possible, Cherry adds.

“Microsoft needs to help XP users determine if their hardware is up to running Windows 7, and which device drivers for their hardware and programs need updating,” Cherry says. “It then needs to help people find the updated drivers and software.”

Yes, this will be easier for those who wish to switch. Those who do switch will have been toughened by the problems they have had to navigate with Vista.

The really odd thing is, I thought we were supposed to be working towards greater ease of use. Am I wrong?

-

The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction has to make sense.Tom Clancy