Microsoft - ‘Have It Our Way, We Insist’
- 6
- Add a Comment
It seems that the new year over at ZDNet has brought a change. There are quite a few entries today taking Microsoft to task for one thing or another.
Jason Perlow certainly doesn’t like the form that Windows 7 is taking, with its change from Vista, and other changes from longstanding Windows behavior.
I find it difficult to believe that Windows 7 was created to be easier to use than Vista — if anything, they’ve introduced a number of UI changes that make the system much harder to navigate, particularly if you’ve never used Vista and are going direct to Windows 7 from Windows XP, which is the path that many users will experience.
Wow! Doesn’t sound good to me. This is someone who has the beta code on their machine, not a third hand story from a self-professed expert down the street. Also, as many have said in column after column, if Microsoft is to release this product sometime during 2009, there is not enough time to make any major changes to the base code.
The Start Menu in Windows 7 will be an area of much consternation for veteran Windows XP users. Overall, the Windows 7 Start Menu is not a major change from the Vista SP1 Start Menu, so existing Vista users will not have much to complain about. However, Microsoft has now completely removed the ability to have a “Classic” Start Menu, which will anger many veteran Windows users that have been using the system that way since at least 1999 when Windows 2000 was released, and some of us since Windows 95.
As one of the many who don’t like this change that was made in XP, and who continue to use the original start menu behavior, established when Mick Jagger extolled us to ‘Start Me Up!’, this will be hard to take.
To make matters even worse, the “Run” option is no longer directly accessible from the Start Menu as a default behavior, you have to get to it via a Search. Once you get to Run via Search, you can click on it to execute any commands you like, such as the CMD.EXE prompt, and you can drag it onto the Desktop, but you can’t drag it onto the new Taskbar, like you can do with any add-on program, such as Firefox. You can turn the Run command on after the fact in the Start Menu options, but that in and of itself is extremely annoying, it’s as if Microsoft has gone out of its way to make power users lives more difficult. (EDIT: The lack of a Run appearing by default appears to be a hold-over from Vista — in other words, MS still isn’t learning from its mistakes.)
As the article continues, Mr. Perlow states that someone else there clued him in on the use of the Windows key, but for many, it will be a shock. Some of us (like me) use keyboards that have no Windows key (Northgate Omnikey), and are not willing to change. This too can be worked around, as MS has made about 3 ways to do anything in Windows. The point is, the way that the majority of people do things is being changed, apparently on a whim from Microsoft.
As a general theme, Microsoft seems to have made changes for the sake of change, which was the case with Vista and is even more apparent with Windows 7, once you start digging into the OS dialogs and UI in depth.
This is part of the problem I have seen with Microsoft for a while. Change for the sake of change to me indicates lack of direction, and a tacit admission that the designers know that people were not happy with Vista, so they have been given the task to change things, but have no clue about what needs changing.
I also find the Windows 7 Control Panel to be less intuitive than XP’s — they’ve tried to simplify things, but in doing so, actually made it more frustrating, because you now need one additional mouse click to see all the Control Panel options — of which there are now approximately double than which existed in XP. Clearly, they could have done a better job at consolidating functions, or at the very least, provided a better UI for navigating such a long list of stuff, such as a tree drill-down view that is used in the Computer Management control in the Microsoft Management Console.
This type of change will be tolerated, as most of the users are sheep, but it will not be liked by many. It just might encourage passive-aggressive behavior, where instead of complaining to Microsoft, the user base, with many more things to be upset about in 7, simply ‘switches, rather than fights’.
Can you say Linux, boys and girls? I knew you could!
-
![]() |
I take my wife everywhere, but she keeps finding her way back.Henny Youngman |



6 Comments
Amy Blumenfield
January 2nd, 2009
at 1:19pm
I was upset about Run being missing until I learned that I could run (or navigate) to anything via the Search bar at the bottom of the Start screen. It does everything that Run did + more. I really miss it now when I switch to an older box still running XP.
Phil
January 2nd, 2009
at 6:26pm
Well i had the 7000 build (i have removed it now) and i generally like the new start menu. While i did not tried this out but i believe the shortcut key win-r will still launchs the ‘run’ application. Windows 7 has search and XP is lacking in this making it much easier for average users to locate things. For example i could just search for partition and it will located the area in the control panel that i would need. I also disagree that they just making just random changes for no reason. The changes make it easier for most users who are not tech geeks to use to computer more effectively
the oracle
January 2nd, 2009
at 7:14pm
Amy and Phil, thanks for the comments.
Phil, you seem to like it (Vista, that is) but I would ask you to ask yourself ‘Why is it that non-technical people CONSISTENTLY choose OS X as easier to use than any Microsoft product?
Should the company not be aiming for increased usability, if it is going to change the interface?
Also, not sure why you would search for ‘partition’ in control panel. are you speaking of the disk partitioning utility? If so, Linux has Vista beat hands down, with G Part Ed - it is the EASIEST, FASTEST, and MOST LOGICAL partitioning program I’ve ever used. As a matter of fact, when XP or Vista screws the pooch (they both do, and if you’ve never experienced it, you’re very lucky) using an Ubuntu Live Disk, booting with it, and using the disk utilities available with Linux is an easy way to get things back to where they should be. Microsoft should write such useful stuff. It is possible to repair things with Linux utilities that are beyond the capabilities of what’s in XP or Vista.
Jason Perlow
January 2nd, 2009
at 7:24pm
Ye gods! Somebody got it!
leftystrat
January 2nd, 2009
at 8:26pm
I was flipped out enough when I had to use Vista those two times. This sounds worse, if that’s possible.
I’d sooner teach 250 people to use linux. Actually I wouldn’t have to. If they can use XP, they can use linux. Not so for Vista or Seven.
Hey, let’s hide stuff randomly, ok? Let’s take useful stuff and really put it in some dark corner.
It’s ok, it’s much prettier this way.
AMD Talk » Microsoft - ‘Have It Our Way, We Insist’ ~ Revelations From An …
January 2nd, 2009
at 10:31pm
[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptHowever, Microsoft has now completely removed the ability to have a “Classic” Start Menu, which will anger many veteran Windows users that have been using the system that way since at least 1999 when Windows 2000 was released, … [...]