E-Mail:

The Logical Extension of ‘I’m A PC’ & Other Things Lame

First, let me be the first to say that people are entitled to their own opinions, no matter how inane or illogical they might be.

That said, I am writing this about the mother of all inane articles, written by a guest on ZDNet. The person that wrote the article is Todd Hooper, who appears to be a developer of software, and is writing in a column devoted to security.

The article starts out with his proud admission that he is, in fact, a PC – you know, the idiot who uses the PC in the Apple commercials. Does anyone in their right mind really want to be compared with this dolt? The guy in the commercial looks, and acts, as though the act of tying his shoes in the morning is a tax on his abilities. The author then speaks glowingly of his use of Vista on a Sony VAIO notebook. He states that BitLocker is the best thing for security he has ever seen, and he, being concerned about security on a daily basis, simply loves it. The preceding statement is his entire case for the assertion that Vista is so much more secure than Windows XP. Well, perhaps he has never heard of PGP, or any of a number of other privacy utilities, that accomplish the same thing, but don’t do it at the lowest level, the OS, where, if something goes wrong, there is little chance of recovering anything.

He then begins extolling the other benefits of Vista. Cited are speed, network access protection, and the newest iteration of the one part of Windows most frequently replaced by something else, Explorer. Surely the man is joking. No, it seems he is serious. Nearly every one of my customers longs for the days of XTree Gold or Norton Commander to work with files, and is always looking for something to make that task easier and more natural.  The only ones who don’t have this need are the same ones who use the My Computer icon to access files, and who have huge hard drives, with no partitions – you know, the uninformed, and happily proud to remain that way.

I’m not a platform bigot - once upon a time I worked for Apple, my previous company Trillium Lane Labs was Macintosh based and I’ve used Unix and Linux for most of my career. But at the end of the day Mac OS X just doesn’t work for me as a laptop OS. The combination of Vista plus great Office 2007 applications (especially OneNote) is unbeatable, and I like having my own choice of hardware rather than being tied to Apple’s hardware roadmap.

No, perhaps he is not, but he certainly seems shortsighted. It seems that if you are really concerned about security, you would either invest in some 3rd party utilities, such as antiviral and firewall applications, or, better, use some form of secured Linux, such as Fedora. It’s what the people who are really interested in security do, after all.

At the end of the article, he talks about no OS being perfect. (yes, the one area in the article I can truly agree with!) But then he speaks of how Windows 7 will allow users to get the experience that Microsoft envisioned with Vista. What? This certainly sounds as though he might have had some problems he is unwilling to disclose.

He finishes the article once again speaking of how secure Vista is. He must not have read any of the unbiased reviews, that said the differences between the security of Vista SP1 versus Windows XP Service Pack 3 are minimal.

The author seems to be one of those who either don’t do anything to uncover the flaws of Vista in their daily work, or are satisfied with low performance in the name of security. He doesn’t seem to be annoyed by the constant intrusions of User Account Control. That, by itself, makes me wonder what this man does with his machine. Either he has the patience of Job, or he never does anything out of the ordinary. Can this really be true? Of course, the man also mentions in more than one place that he thinks Office 2007 is great also. This, far different than the experiences of people I have spoken with, shows that this is someone who is widely divergent from the average person. In my travels, I have yet to have a single person speak kindly of Office 2007, and many have said they begrudgingly got used to it out of some necessity, or because there was no choice in the matter.

I really don’t like to speak of conspiracies, but this seems like one of those cases where some form of inducement has elicited the resounding praise of something judged by most as tepid at best.

-

Life is hard. After all, it kills you.Katharine Hepburn

9 Comments

I’m not sure you and I read the same articles (I followed your link).

An example, I only found one area that the author gave approval for Office 2007, calling out OneNote. While I agree with the OneNote comment, I wish someone would smack MS around a bit with the terrible performance of Outlook 2007 connected to Exchange.

With that said, long live Xobni!

Well I’ll speak kindly of Office 2007. If you come from the older Office 2xxx versions Office 2007 takes some time to get use to the new paradigm for doing things.

However, I originally came from the Framemaker paradigm and found the Office 2000-2003 methods clumsy for setting attributes of a paragraph and most of the other objects in Word.

At least in Word 2007 there is a shift to thinking about attributes of the object (example: font, point size, line spacing, color, bullet points) instead of thinking each action that you need to apply (example: first set the point size, then set the font, then set the bullet style, then set the indent, then set color, then set the line spacing …)

IMHO the Word 2007 model is a step in the right direction.

BTW to be fair Vista really is annoying, stupid and just a pain in the …. to use compared to Windows XP.

jason, ok, I guess it can be called once, I wasn’t looking directly at the article when I wrote this, but recalling after reading it a few hours prior. Still, it seems forced, and no one I have come in contact with is so happy as this guy about the use of these products.

Thanks for the comment.

zenium, you are right about it, and yet, it seems I’m going to give Vista another try, as I will be building a machine with more than 3GB of memory, with the needs of family to use a Windows product, and no copy of XP64 available to me - so I will be getting Vista 64, and trying to put my mark on the installation. Stay tuned for the fireworks.

Office 2007 takes some time to get use to the new paradigm for doing things.

zenium, that is one of my biggest gripes with MS. They feel free to completely rework the UI every few years. WHY?? Why subject your customers to the pain of having to relearn everything, just because you have a large crew of developers who delight in tossing out the old and bringing in the new (and difficult-to-use)?

Why? Because they can.

Well, back to my Ubuntu desktop. Gotta get some REAL work done ;-)

A comment on one item you mentioned: Those pining for XTree Gold should look into ZTree. It’s a windows-aware, long-filename-loving, version of XTree. It’s been written from the ground up by a very talented individual, and has the approval of the creator of XTree.
It has an active forum, and the author is very responsive to ideas etc from users.
http://www.ztree.com should get you started.

D Bullock, unless it has recently changed, it is a mere shadow of what XTree was. Fr’instance, you could (can?) not do a tagging of certain files in disparate directories, then do a (S)howAll command, and see the files, without the directory names, together, to enable a group move copy, rename or whatever.

It also bothers me that the original key strokes (following WordStar command conventions) was dropped in favor of some other idea.

Yes, I have avoided purchasing/using Vi$ta for myself. Times have changed; I now recommend it for many who lack proper understanding of the dangers of going online. I have watched in horror as people who are seemingly intelligent have computers totally unusable because they do not wish to struggle with the need to know and operate their machinery in a safe and proper manner.
For them Vista does not just seem; it is the only choice to keep them safe and happy.
I have, therefore, embraced Vista for most of my friends/collegues/clients, and could actually consider it for a few of my newer applications. It’s just easier to protect others with Vista than trying to train/retrain them to use Apple or …X. (If they could be trained, after all, … they wouldn’t have the problems with XP, would they?)

Media-Ted, the problem I see with this is that when the user who has been started off with Vista wants to ‘take off the training wheels’ it requires an operating system change to get it done. (As I say this I am contemplating the use of Vista 64 because of memory needs, and the inability to get my hands on a copy of XP64)

What Do You Think?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

67 queries / 0.389 seconds.