California Marijuana Ballot Initiative
- 2
- Add a Comment
Better sell all those NORML t-shirts now, while they have some value, other than as relics of a by-gone era. There is a ballot initiative coming up, possibly as early as November to legalize – not simply decriminalize marijuana.
Reefer madness, indeed.
from laist
There is an initiative in the works that could end up on the November ballot that allows for marijuana to be sold to anyone, and anywhere that already sells alcohol. Its being called The Inalienable Rights Enforcement Initiative. From the full text of the measure:
This initiative will amend the Constitution of California to defend and safeguard the inalienable rights of the People against infringement by governments and corporations, providing for the lawful growth, sale, and possession of marijuana. Marijuana will be taxed through a system of stamps and licenses–a $5 stamp will be required for the sale of an eighth ounce of marijuana and a $50 annual license will be required for the growth of one marijuana plant. To protect participants and encourage participation in the system, such licenses and stamps will be available anonymously in stores where marijuana is sold.
and
We also hold these truths to be self-evident-That, as an intoxicant, marijuana is far less harmful to the health and safety of the People than alcohol–That, as a smoking substance, marijuana is far less addictive or harmful to the health of the People than tobacco–That, even though alcohol is harmful to the health and safety of the People, the prohibition of alcohol from 1920 to 1933 only increased the harms associated with alcohol use: criminals seized control of the alcohol market, crime and violence increased greatly, and poverty, unemployment, and corruption flourished, while otherwise lawful alcohol drinkers were treated as “criminals” subject to detention, arrest, and incarceration, even though they had not harmed the rights of anyone–That, as with alcohol prohibition, the prohibition of marijuana has only increased the harms associated with the use of marijuana: criminals control a multi-billion dollar market, crime and violence have increased greatly, and poverty, unemployment, and corruption flourish, while otherwise law-abiding marijuana smokers are treated as “criminals” subject to detention, arrest, and incarceration, even though they have not harmed the rights of anyone-That the history of marijuana prohibition is a history of repeated injuries and infringements upon the inalienable rights, powers, and best interests of the People.
They need 694,354 signatures by September, 5, 2008. I think it’s totally do-able. Its been over a decade since Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, was passed with over 5 million votes in favor.
So 12 years later… are we more or less tolerant of recreational use of marijuana? For now, we’ll have to wait and see.
As someone who is truly a disinterested third party, I hope it passes by a wide margin. First, I am enough of a Libertarian to believe that people should be able to ‘pick their own poison’. Second, legalizing it makes the seedy underbelly of the system change – your dealer can start advertising, wearing a suit and tie, and drop the counterculture garbage. Third, once the state gets in on enough of this, perhaps our abused roadways, public structures, and other infrastructure can be brought back to the quality once enjoyed here in California. Fourth, and half joking, but half seriously, perhaps some of the idiots in Sacramento will lighten up, and stop thinking that total control is the concept of the week.
full article
-
Technorati Tags: marijuana - legalize it - NORML - pot - ballot initiative - California

2 Comments
leftystrat
July 1st, 2008
at 3:22pm
I don’t smoke, drink, or do drugs, but I firmly support your right to. I don’t care what you do, so long as you’re not driving.
I find it difficult to accept the govt claim that it has any rights at all over my body. or what goes into it.
the oracle
July 1st, 2008
at 10:19pm
I agree. I think the individual has the right to be stupid, as in the case of seatbelt non-use, or use of drugs. This is part of free society. Anti-drug laws should be in place only to protect those below the age of reason - once that is attained all restrictions should come off.