Why Microsoft Should Explain What’s In Service Pack 3
- 6
- Add a Comment
This morning when I went to my mail (e-mail, that is) I found the newest copy of Windows Secrets. The very first thing that jumped off the page was how Windows XP Service Pack 3 is causing all manner of problems with antivirus and antimalware programs.
Now this is one time when I don’t think Microsoft is fully responsible, as the purveyor of any product that works on an operating system should be aware of changes in that operating system, and have all the potential problems worked out before the release of the updates to that operating system. This is not a matter of some complex interaction between hardware and drivers - it is simply the scanning of files that are part of the operating system as they sit on the drive and are loaded into memory.
On the other hand, Microsoft needs to ‘fess up’ about the changes in Service pack 3, as the things changed were to be very small compared to SP2, and the majority of changes were to have been delivered by Windows Update to most machines that have kept up with the Terrible Tuesday update cycle.
from Windows Secrets Newsletter Issue 154
Installing Windows XP Service Pack 3 can cause your anti-malware programs to report the presence of Trojans and keyloggers that aren’t there.
The false positives have blocked important system files in some cases, and in others they have misled users into reinstalling XP.SP3 causes some malware scanners to cry “wolf”
Comments on a PC Tools forum confirm customer reports that the company’s Spyware Doctor program generates a false positive on systems with Windows XP SP3.
Similarly, at least one site claims that Symantec’s Norton Internet Security software identifies a common system file as a keylogger.
ReviewSaurus reports that XP SP3 causes Norton Internet Security to identify ctfmon.exe as a keylogger (a kind of malware that records your keystrokes to capture passwords and other important data).
In reality, the ctfmon.exe file in your Windows\System32 folder is a Microsoft system file that enables alternative input methods such as speech, tablet, or on-screen keyboard.
A spokesperson for Symantec was not immediately available for comment.
In the case of Spyware Doctor, the popular antispyware tool from PC Tools detects Trojan-Spy.Pophot.WX in RunDLL32.exe even if the system is uninfected. RunDLL32.exe is a system file that Windows uses to run code in dynamic link library (DLL) files.
The scan may also implicate other related system files, according to a report on the blog A Healthy Fear of Botulism.
By default, Spyware Doctor prevents any files it identifies as infected from running. If an important system file such as RunDLL32.exe is flagged incorrectly, the result can be disastrous for your PC. For example, users may be blocked from opening Windows Control Panel or using System Restore, among other operations.
One user who contacted us noted that blocking RunDLL32.exe created “an endless loop of scanning to remove the file, rebooting, finding the file again.”
“I’ve lost more than two days trying to fix something that was never broken,” he adds. “As far as mistakes go, this is pretty major.”
Other Spyware Doctor customers just gave up: “I had the same problem today,” reported Dave (screen name doz3r). “I got tired of fighting with it and just reinstalled the OS.”
For its part, PC Tools claims that a patch is in the works. “We are implementing a fix immediately,” wrote Super Moderator Anthony Chen on the PC Tools forum.
As of Wednesday evening, PC Tools has yet to make a fix available through the company’s Smart Update feature.
Until there’s a fix, there’s a workaround
In the case of the Norton Internet Security, ReviewSaurus advises users to ignore the false warning about ctfmon.exe.
Until a fix is available from PC Tools, Chen advises customers to add RunDLL32.exe to the global action list manually. The workaround consists of the following steps:
Step 1. In the Spyware Doctor window, click the Settings button on the left.
Step 2. Click Global Action List to the right of that.
Step 3. At the bottom of the window, click Add.
Step 4. In the New Rule dialog box, choose “File on disk” from the “Select data type” drop-down list.
Step 5. To the right of the text box below, click the … button to browse for a file. Locate and select RunDLL32.exe in the Windows\System32 folder.
Step 6. Make sure “Always allow” is selected in the drop-down list at the bottom and click the Add button.
Other XP SP3 compatibility problems may yet loom
Really. “We had no idea”, said Henny Penny.
This is not the first problem created by Microsoft’s latest (and last) service pack for Windows XP. Earlier this month, some HP PCs with an AMD processor experienced endless reboots after SP3 was installed.
These and other issues are documented by Windows Secrets columnist Susan Bradley’s Patch Watch column in the paid section of this week’s newsletter, as well as in her May 15 column. Bradley also provides advice on preparing for SP3 in the paid section of the May 1 issue.
If you are concerned about the effect the collection of patches that comprise XP SP3 will have on your PCs, wait a while before downloading and installing the service pack.
Check the support sites of the vendors of your most important products for news of compatibility issues with SP3. As the problems experienced by users of these anti-malware programs show, a collection of patches as large as SP3 may require some patches of its own.
Users should not have to play ‘Who Do You Trust’ this way, but until more people switch to another operating system, that is going to be the way it is - Microsoft just can’t seem to ‘come clean’ up front about changes, and apparently the security firms have been lulled into a false sense of calm by the lack of a really large, looming problem, like Sasser.
-
Quote of the day:
No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up. - Lily Tomlin
Technorati Tags: Microsoft - Service Pack 3 - antispyware - antimalware - antivirus - compatibility problems possible - Vista update scheduler
Tags: microsoft, service pack 3, antispyware, antimalware, antivirus, compatibility problems possible, vista update scheduler

6 Comments
Doug
May 22nd, 2008
at 3:39pm
The biggest issue that I am having with Windows XP Service Pack 3 (both a new slipstreamed installed and an updated install of an already used Window XP Service Pack 2 install) is related to networked drives. When I have a networked drive, and drag-and-drop and file from that volume to my local disk, I experience a Internet Explorer dialog box that asks whether I want to copy and paste out of into this zone. I checked Internet Options, specially the security tab and nothing seems to fix the problem.
Ron Schenone
May 22nd, 2008
at 5:05pm
Microsoft uses the KFC approach. No one needs to know the secret ingredients. :-)
the oracle
May 22nd, 2008
at 6:43pm
Doug, I learned my lesson a while back, with problems I had on a series of Dells and a set of patches, So now I wait - but only when it’s Microsoft. I realize that sounds very bad, but it is true. I truly used to be such a fan, and now I’ve been burned once too many times. I now will always err on the side of caution. (I also believe that if Gates was not such an incredible salesman - credit where due - that OS/2 would be where XP is, and IBM would be the one everyone was gunning for. At the same time, OS/2 would be, in the IBM tradition, at Service Pack 38, with fixes for all the new things that came along, and solid as a tank.)
Since you don’t have the problem of continuous reboots you should consider your blessings, and on the one not slipstreamed, just remove SP3.
the oracle
May 22nd, 2008
at 6:47pm
Ron, except when the secret ingredients are making people sick the FDA would be getting into it.
Perhaps there should have been a retraction of SP3, and a bold statement of ‘we will serve no Service Pack until it’s time!’, then some fresh eyes on the code and thorough testing.
Sergei
May 23rd, 2008
at 1:19pm
All of this Vista/SP3 stuff is just making me want to swich to OS X. It seems you don’t know who to trust or what to expect. Microsoft is struggling heavily, they need put all there energy into making sure there OSs are fully functional.
SS
July 16th, 2008
at 9:27am
I am not very computer savvy. I am learning all the time. I learned one thing a long time ago. Beware of Microsoft products that have not been in use for very long. When I downloaded Service Pack 3, I saw that Microsoft suggested a system back-up prior to installation, and that was enough of a red flag for me. Later, I took a look at the EULA (which I normally do not examine closely) and I don’t really see the point of having it. Maybe it’s just me, but then I googled the update plus the word “explain”, and found this site. Just as I suspected, there are problems with the update, and at the same time, I don’t see much benefit to having it anyway. The bottom line is this: Thanks for you tech-savvy types for keeping an eye on things for the rest of us.
Note: Even the most ill-informed of us are beginning to realize that it is unwise to just swallow something offered by Microsoft if you’ve got everything working well already!