E-Mail:
Author Avatar

New Attacks On Yahoo Show What is Wrong in America

Carl Icahn, the billionaire investor that, upon close scrutiny, makes one think of the major character Gordon Gekko in ‘Wall Street’, shows what is wrong with America, and rampant capitalism fueled only by greed.

Yes, I know how that sounds. No, I am no lover of communism, or even socialism, but unlike Gordon Gekko, I don’t happen to believe that ‘capitalism just works’. Anytime humans are a part of something, there is chance for disaster. That is what is beginning to happen here.

Why this corporate raider has decided to insinuate himself into the business of Yahoo is beyond me, but then that is part of the problem. It should be beyond him, too. People who are involved in things only for the money should probably get out.

from Betanews

In the opening move of a game he plays better than anyone alive, billionaire investor Carl Icahn has named a powerhouse team of investors and executives who would be ready and willing to lead Yahoo into a big future with Microsoft.

The dissident proxy slate of Yahoo directors proposed this morning by Icahn Capital chief Carl Icahn is comprised of frequent Icahn allies associates, along with extremely accomplished executives and investors. Icahn unveiled his team this morning in an open letter to Yahoo Chairman Roy Bostock.

“It is clear to me that the board of directors of Yahoo has acted irrationally and lost the faith of shareholders and Microsoft,” Icahn’s letter to Bostock begins. “It is quite obvious that Microsoft’s bid of $33 per share is a superior alternative to Yahoo’s prospects on a standalone basis. I am perplexed by the board’s actions. It is irresponsible to hide behind management’s more than overly optimistic financial forecasts. It is unconscionable that you have not allowed your shareholders to choose to accept an offer that represented a 72% premium over Yahoo’s closing price of $19.18 on the day before the initial Microsoft offer. I and many of your shareholders strongly believe that a combination between Yahoo and Microsoft would form a dynamic company and more importantly would be a force strong enough to compete with Google on the Internet.”

That last sentence again points out what is wrong with this mentality. The perpetrators of this type of capitalism see evil everywhere except where they should…in their own actions. The purpose of any company is to do more than rape the public for the benefit of the stockholders.

The problems that Yahoo has experienced show precisely why it is hard for some companies to go public, because when that happens, the vultures and idiots (perhaps one and the same) start circling.

Backing Icahn up in his plan to reshape the online landscape are some powerhouse names, including Nextel founder John Chapple (reportedly one of Microsoft’s choices for its own would-be proxy slate), legendary mutual fund manager Brian Posner, New Line Cinema Co-chairman and Co-CEO Robert Shaye, former Universal Studios chief Frank Biondi — one of Hollywood’s most respected former executives — and another billionaire investor-slash-household name, Dallas Mavericks and HDNet owner Mark Cuban.

Also on that list is Icahn himself, of course. It wasn’t stated who would necessarily be elected chairman of that board, though it’s a fair bet that Icahn would be the leading candidate.

Icahn’s goals obviously include big short-term gains. He wants to replace Yahoo’s existing board that was opposed to a Microsoft buyout at all costs, with a team more copacetic to the notion. But the fact that Icahn’s team represents not just Wall Street investors but seasoned managers in their own right points to the possibility of an unspoken long-term goal: a big hand in the oversight of a much bigger company.

In just the last few weeks, Icahn has become a major Yahoo investor and plans to become bigger one, according to his own letter. He purchased 59 million more shares and share-equivalents of Yahoo stock, and has signaled with the US Federal Trade Commission his intention to purchase more shares worth $2.5 billion. Outside estimates are that Icahn already owns 2.5% of Yahoo, and this purchase may bring his stake up to 4% — not huge, but certainly enough to give him a platform when he addresses shareholders on July 3.

Since a Microsoft merger is the stated, outright goal of this nomination, its success would make his Icahn Capital venture a principal investor in a newly combined Microsoft Corp. Certainly some of his proposed alternative Yahoo board — including, most likely, Chapple — would be open to the notion of being seated on Microsoft’s board in a post-merger scenario.

According to a filing last February with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Icahn Capital did not have a major stake in Microsoft, and did not hold one in Yahoo either at that time. Curiously, though, he does continue to own about a third of a billion in combined stocks in Time Warner, the parent company of AOL — which is one of the companies Yahoo was seen associating with, in order to fuel speculation about “strategic alternatives” that could thwart a Microsoft buyout.

Forcing a merger with Microsoft is merely a way for Icahn and his gang to insinuate themselves into Microsoft, so perhaps Darth Ballmer should get upset at this point. We, as viewers on the sidelines, should be at least a bit anxious, as this, for those that believe, could take Microsoft even further toward the dark side. A Microsoft - Yahoo merger by these people would yield a company that cares even less about quality of product, and only about shareholder value. It could be the start of the long, ugly collapse of Microsoft, after a few more iterations of crappy software, released on a shareholder timetable, with no care for the quality of the product.

and

“While it is my understanding that you do not intend to enter into any transaction that would impede a Microsoft-Yahoo merger,” Carl Icahn wrote Roy Bostock this morning, with his usual sense of perfect word choice. “I am concerned that in several recent press releases you stated that you intend to pursue certain ’strategic alternatives.’ I therefore hope and trust that if there is any question that these ’strategic alternatives’ might in any way impede a future Microsoft merger you will at the very least allow shareholders to opine on them before embarking on such a transaction.”

The other “strategic alternative” involves a combination or partnership with Google. Icahn wants none of that — and incidentally, he is not a major Google shareholder.

Yahoo’s current board of directors includes the managing director of Softbank Capital and former Ziff-Davis publishing executive Eric Hippeau, Activision Chairman and CEO Robert Kotick, Northwest Airlines Chairman Emeritus Gary Wilson, and Arthur Kern, the chairman of American Media which publishes the National Enquirer. Yahoo did not have a public comment on Icahn’s move this morning.

This bozo is only concerned with merging Yahoo with Microsoft. It is not because he has any grasp of the situation in ‘cyberville’. It is not for the betterment of either of these companies. It is purely for the increase in his portfolio, and the rest of the world be damned.

Need I say more?

-

Quote of the day:
The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern. - Lord Acton

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,

Tags: , , , , , , ,

4 Comments

Hear hear!

I wholeheartedly agree, but - alas - the “American Mindset” (yet another horrific combination of terms) is bent on following two things: 1. “The Winner”; and, 2. “The Underdog”.
Sadly, most Americans are more involved and concerned with the illusion of appearing to have, … or be, the things perceived (by voluminous advertising) as “popular” or “sucessful”. They lost sight - and consciencousness - of quality at least 2 - 3 generations ago. A silly, but reliable example: In the 1930’s and 1940’s people would flock to dances and enjoy the styles of Glenn Miller and others. Why? Because the music was good to dance to and they enjoyed attending and participating. When “Elvis, the pelvis”, The Beatles, Alice Cooper, and others came along, people flocked to the “concerts” as well. Why? To feel a part of the great “popularity”; to scream, to carry on like inmates of a cacophonous asylum given to insane bedlam. They surrendered their indivuality, their honor, their existance to the “group”. It became the fashion to lay down one’s being for another - totally disrespective of the loss suffered, or of the lack of “return” in exchange for such a sacrifice.
We are now in a “nation” born, bred, and “nurtured(?)” of those who gave all for nothing. Is it any wonder that soulless corporations can control the progeny with little more than propaganda?
You seem to approach this article from a position of “Values”. Many readers may also share this environment, but far too many will not be aware of the article, your concern, or the events taking place. Why? Because they are waiting for the next encampment for the latest i-release. These people have so many gadgets - most of which they can never hope to use to the fullest - just because they are attracted to the “rush”.

I see people with little-to-no education; with few abilities to interact socially - people who can’t/won’t speak correctly, who shun good English and grammar - “texting” all over the place. They have nothing to say, what do they know that’s worth sharing? Nothing, but they do have the latest technology/gadget, so they “text”. People who buy a car because, “Boy, I’ll sure get noticed now!”, yet they are completely unaware that others see them in the same car and make the same empty statement(s).

Now back to the subject at hand. Only those who 1. know quality, 2. require quality to produce something with their time/efforts, 3. demand quality in the tools used - will be offended by what is going on. There’s very little money in those miniscule numbers. The money is in the vast crowds of the ignorant; the money is no longer following the best product; the money is following the game.

We have at least three generations lost to the “gaming” world; people with no thought or grasp of actual reality. They can lose their lives until the machine locks them out. Consequences are minimal and self-renewing. The frightful combination of hordes of people surrendered to “trends”, combined with the total lack of (more at: repudiation) true reality, … preferring “Virtual Reality”, leaves us with a nation lost to quality and reality. For them - and for their “gods”, those to whom you referred by name above - the only reality is the one they, or someone equally unconcerned - create for themselves. They set up their scenerios, they publish them as fact, they cause them to be accepted by fiat, and then they play the game according to their fiat rules.

Modern society is a fabrication, not real. People are drifting around worlds which never existed. They are totally oblivious to a world around them which is not controlled. They are totally unconcerned that they have no life of their own, that money-hungry - power-crazed monsters have robbed them of real life and real meaning. A sunset - unless it is a screen-saver - goes totally unnoticed.

Where can you begin to reason with these lifeless forms? How can you teach them a value, or quality? Money? What’s that? What can Bill Gates, or any other maniacally “wealthy” god purchase of any real, lasting quality? They don’t - obviously - understand the term because they are isolated and insulated from it as much as their followers! It all goes back to the age-old statement (before political correctness), “The Blind Leading the Blind”.

So a guy “increases his portfolio” what does that mean? What does it represent? How many portfolios saved people in 1929? That’s the best example of how these people rise and fall: it’s all on paper; it’s all a hoax until the bubble bursts, … and then it’s all over. The fact that millions starve as a result is completely lost on them. It always will be.

Certain parts of “The Bible” compare people to many things; things like sheep - the dumbest animals known. Other comparisons are made: “All flesh is as grass, …” Some people - by this analogy - are weeds; they grow in abundance, they reproduce prodigiously, they choke out everything else by their mere numbers. Others are like flowers - concerned only with their beauty, youth, and appearance; they are dead before they expire because of this focus. Then there are the productive, hard-working ones. They are misled by the pretty and choked by the weeds, but they keep on doing their job(s) because that’s their existance.

Weeds cannot understand workers; flowers cannot understand much other than personal appearance. It is up to the productive to understand all. You do.

Thanks.

Media-Ted, thanks for 1) the praise, 2) the insight, 3) your willingness to share -

Come back any time and with a few more readers like you who are willing to share ideas this will be a much better place (and world)

[…] will be interesting to see where this goes, because as I have noted before, if he installs certain people on the board, and gets Yahoo and Microsoft together, it is a small […]

What Do You Think?

 


Anti-Spam Image

Want to Start a Blog Here for Free?

Are you an expert in one subject or another? If your goal is to help others and dispense hard-earned information back to the community, stake a claim on your very own Lockergnome blog today! You can write about anything - no matter the topic. Sign-up to start blogging!