E-Mail:
Author Avatar

Articulation of an Often Belabored Point

Today, I ran into a clearly explained set of reasons why I don’t, and probably never will, use Vista as my operating system. For the same reasons that people can still use Windows 98SE, Windows XP will be available for usage by many for a very long time.

Anyway, in words better chosen than I could do (because I usually get too enraged when I try) here are those reasons from another - I quote rather than use a link because many would not take the time to follow the link, and because I can zero in on what is most important.

So…

The software available from JSWare is generally supported on all versions of Windows, from Windows 95 to Windows XP. With Windows Vista things are changing.

 

Vista access restriction problems:

   To use Windows Vista you need to be aware of the extreme access restrictions. By default on Vista, you are assumed to be a corporate employee who has no right to access the files on your PC outside of the “Documents” folder. If you try to access files, Vista will block you. If you try to access the Windows Registry Vista will block you. Worse, Vista will not inform you that your access is blocked. It will pretend that it is not blocking you. In effect, Vista restricts you to a sort of child’s playpen and only lets you play with copies of the files that you want to access. That situation can result in a great deal of confusion and will result in problems with software. For example, some WEB-ED Editor settings changes may not take. You may be unable to find saved files. You may be able to open a file but be unable to save changes to that file. Etc. In order to use JSWare software without problems you will need to “give yourself permission” to fully access your PC, by disabling “User Account Control” (UAC - the “playpen”), running as “Administrator” (without restricted permission), and giving yourself full access to the program folder, as well as any other folders that you may want to open files from or save them to.

   In the case of JSWare free software and components, no Vista support is offered and no Vista support is planned. In fact, much of the JSWare freeware has been specifically designed not to run on Windows Vista at all, in order to avoid unnecessary confusion for people using Windows Vista, and also to avoid unnecessary support queries at JSWare.

   Read on if you would like a more thorough explanation of JSWare support for Windows Vista and why it is changing.

The Windows Operating System - Platform vs Service
The role of an operating system:

   The basic function of an operating system - such as Windows, Linux, or MacOS - is to provide an interface between a computer and its software. The computer provides raw computational functionality. The operating system interfaces between that functionality and the software, allowing useful software to make the computer itself useful. In programming terms, Windows has traditionally been referred to as a platform because of its role as a hardware interface. Windows is the platform that supports software.

Changes in the marketplace:

   Over the past decade, most of the software commonly used on PCs has matured, as have operating systems. Products like Windows, office suites, browsers, email, graphic studios, etc. have not changed radically since the mid-90s. At one time software companies made large profits by periodically releasing new versions of their software with new functions. But for several years now, most people have not needed much in the way of new functions.

   In the face of reduced software sales, a popular idea now current among software companies is “software as a service”, also known as “SaaS”. The strategy behind SaaS is to sell software usage rather than software programs. In other words, “service” software is rented, leased, or charged for on a per-use basis, so that software companies do not have to depend on future sales of new product. (Note that SaaS is not an idea for improving software. It is an idea for improving profits.)

   Imagine if the auto makers, faced with plummeting sales, decided to stop selling cars and open taxi businesses. And imagine further that one auto maker, with over 90% of the market - and monopoly control - decided to also stop the sale of replacement parts so that their customers would be virtually forced to switch over to the new taxi service. Obviously that would not be a good scenario for most car owners. But that is essentially what Microsoft is doing with their “software as a service” strategy. And Windows Vista is a big step in that direction - a step away from the the idea of Windows as a platform.
   Actually, Microsoft is now talking about “software and service”. In other words, they hope to charge you for Windows and charge you for using software on Windows.

   For a thought-provoking description of just how much Microsoft has already changed the definition of their software, see John Dvorak’s story about the day that Microsoft’s Vista spyware system malfunctioned, causing thousands of computers to be disabled while their owners were accused of software theft.

 

A warning about Windows Vista:
   If you do not own a full version CD for an earlier version of Windows then you may be forced to either use Vista or leave Windows behind altogether the next time that you buy a PC. At JSWare we consider Windows Vista to be bloated, overpriced, restrictive, DRM-infested spyware. We do not recommend using Windows Vista. We do not consider it a worthy product. And we do not intend to support Windows Vista per se, or to write software for it.

Bloated and overpriced: If you look at the newspaper flyers for national, US electronics stores, you’ll see that the base price for a cheap PC has gone from a bit over $300 to somewhere in the range of $600-$700. It will cost you about an extra $300 to buy the hardware necessary to support Vista’s frivolous, and entirely superfluous, 3-D techno-kitsch.

Restrictions and spyware: To get a sense of just how much Windows is changing, and how little of that change is likely to be of benefit to Microsoft’s customers, you might find it interesting to read the Windows Vista license (EULA).

   Among the ominous details you will find in the Vista license are the following:

• Even a full version CD of Vista is licensed only for use on one PC. If you need to upgrade hardware, or want to install on a different PC instead, you will have to get permission by applying for a new Product Activation. (sections 1b, 2a) Even that option is restricted in some upgrade scenarios. (section 15b)

• According to Microsoft, it is “illegal” for two people to use a PC running Vista at the same time! (section 2b)

• Windows Vista will periodically contact Microsoft and send information about your Windows installation. You have no choice in this matter. If, during one of these clandestine communications, there is any problem confirming that your copy of Windows is not stolen, your PC will be crippled to the point of being virtually unusable until such time as you prove to Microsoft that you paid for their software.(section 5a-c) (See link above to the John Dvorak article.)

• Under default settings, Windows may remove installed software at Microsoft’s discretion, without asking you. (section 6)

• Under default settings, Windows Update will make changes to the operating system, without asking you. (section 7a)

• Windows Media Player, a spyware product, cannot be removed from Windows Vista under normal conditions. In addition to DRM functions, WMP will also make contact with Microsoft for the purposes of finding commercial music sellers for you to buy from, and to download and install newer versions of itself. You have no choice in this matter if you use WMP. (section 7a)

• “You may not work around any technical limitations in the software”. (section 8) In other words, Windows is now a service and you may only use it as Microsoft wants you to use it.

   Note that under US copyright law you have a right to use purchased material as you see fit and you have a right to make copies for your own use. If you buy a book or a music CD, for example, you can legally do anything with those except distribute copies to other people. It is perfectly legal to use your old Windows operating system on your new PC, and to copy it to your notebook PC, under fair-use laws. But Microsoft has made that virtually impossible through their Product Activation scheme. And now they claim that you do not even have a right to use the product as you see fit.

   In addition to the unusual rules set forth in the Vista license, Vista also institutes extensive security changes that may interfere with software running properly and will likely result in a constant barrage of frivolous security warnings.

   It is due mainly to the quasi-legal restrictions and the spyware functionality that we recommend against using Windows Vista. It is due mainly to the new compatibility problems that most JSWare software is not supported on Windows Vista. The compatibility issues in Windows Vista involve both hardware and software problems. But the biggest problem is restriction of user rights. The average person using Vista under default settings will be disallowed from accessing most of the files on their computer! It is difficult for most software to run properly under those conditions.

   In fact, even if you turn off all user restrictions on Windows Vista, you will still be blocked from the system folder. In other words, with Windows Vista you are not allowed to alter any files that are part of the actual operating system. On the face of it that may seem reasonable to many people. After all, most people do not want to rebuild their computer operating system. But this restriction means that you bought a product and are blocked from using that product as you see fit. While you may not want to alter or replace operating system files, you might want to install software that does so. Or you might want your tech. support person to be able to do so. With Windows Vista you are blocked. You have no more control over the actual operating system than you do over your cable TV box.

   It’s an ironic situation, in a way: For years, conspiracy theorists have speculated over whether Microsoft might have installed a secret “back door” into Windows. Were they spying on customers? Were they giving access to governments? Now Microsoft has installed an enormous locked front door, and you don’t get a key. Not only can Microsoft access your computer remotely. They can control and access parts of your system that you can’t. Yet few people are complaining.

 

Windows XP and Vista: A Product That Lies by Design
   As is outlined in the sections above, Microsoft is gradually trying to switch from selling software to selling services. Unfortunately, Microsoft is also trying to force their software customers to become their service customers. This started with Windows XP: The Windows XP system is designed to lie to you in order to control your actions. Even if you run Window XP “as administrator”, with full rights, Windows will still hide Registry keys; it will still pretend to let you delete files even though you will be blocked from doing so; it will go through the motions of removing force-installed software like Windows Media Player, but the software is not actually removed.

   In Windows Vista the situation gets worse. You will be blocked from accessing most of your own computer by default and Vista will pummel you with nag messages if you attempt to “give yourself permission” to control your own PC. In many cases downloading files or running software may simply not work: No explanation… no options… no messages… nothing.

   These security measures are not really aimed at protecting you from bad software or online attacks. If that were the case, Windows XP and Vista would naturally provide clear explanations and clear option settings, so that you could use security options as desired. But in most cases, Windows XP and Vista do not even tell you that you are being restricted. And in many cases where settings can be adjusted, those settings are “secret” - unpublished and only known to a few.

   The changes in XP and Vista are actually aimed at protecting your PC from you, rather than vice versa. Microsoft is attempting to gradually herd their customers toward acceptance of a services device, through restrictions and endless nag messages. The idea is that eventually you will use Windows mainly for things that pay Microsoft: Movie and music rentals, software rentals, etc.

   If you think the explanations here are far-fetched, or that they consitute “Microsoft bashing”, you might consider reading some of the articles linked below. Also, consider the fact that Microsoft announced, in May, 2007, the purchase of AQuantive for $6 billion. AQuantive is an online advertising company. It includes “AvenueA”, an ad-hosting operation similar to Doubleclick. So the world’s biggest software company, the company that provides over 90 percent of PC operating systems worldwide, is moving into the advertising business. Oddly, the mass media reporters and columnists generally do not seem to find that fact alarming. Then again, the mass media receives a great deal of advertising money from Microsoft. At the very least there is a notable conflict of interest here, in that Microsoft, the company with monopoly control over the computing medium itself, is now moving to control, and profit from, the content of that medium.

 

JSWare support for Windows Vista

   In brief, our view is that Windows Vista is an unsuitable and unusable product for its purpose. Rather than wasting everyone’s time with support requests that can’t be helped, we decided that it makes more sense to simply block Vista support altogether. With most of the free JSWare programs and components, if you try to use them on Vista you will see a message saying that Windows Vista is not supported and the software will then either stop responding or will close itself.

A bit long, perhaps, but said clearly and without the anger I would tend to inject.

What do you think of the author’s line of reasoning?

Tags: , , ,

2 Comments

I’m sorry but I have to respond to this. I have to say first of all that I have Vista at home, I’ve also recommended to my parents that they upgrade to Vista, which both of them have done, and I purchased a Vista HP machine for my mother-in-law a year ago. I like Vista, I have spent 0 hours in the past 6 months helping anyone figure out why their machine doesn’t boot or restoring internet connections that mysteriously drop. If Vista is so awful and user restrictions are bad, and I have my life back, then what is the definition of good?

A few excerpts from the article:

“Worse, Vista will not inform you that your access is blocked”
That’s not my experience, I get notified all the time, and honestly it is kind of annoying but I guess if my mother in law can do it then anybody can. :)

“JSWare freeware has been specifically designed not to run on Windows Vista at all, in order to avoid unnecessary confusion for people using Windows Vista, and also to avoid unnecessary support queries at JSWare.”
I’m not familiar with JSWare, but yes by not supporting Vista then it will be unnecessary for Vista customers to call in. Very solid logic!

“Note that SaaS is not an idea for improving software. It is an idea for improving profits.”
That’s not entirely true, actually. The theory behind SaaS is that updates can be rolled out incrementally rather than in 1 big release per year or 1 release every other year, which requires a large investment to get on the latest release. Think WoW vs Diablo and which do you think has more new content 1 year after release?

“Microsoft is now talking about ’software and service’. In other words, they hope to charge you for Windows and charge you for using software on Windows.”
I’m not sure why this is relevant? Are we talking about Vista? In what sense is Vista SaaS? Like I said I have 4 copies of Vista in my familiy and none of us are paying monthly or yearly fees, the licensing works just like XP in that regard. Microsoft is trying to develop a SaaS version of Office (Live Office), so yes it is thinking about how to avoid upgrade hassles and large patch rollouts, all of which sounds great to me.

“you may be forced to either use Vista or leave Windows behind altogether the next time that you buy a PC”
Hmmm … doesn’t sound like anyone at JSWare would be sad to leave Windows behind … see last point.

“At JSWare we consider Windows Vista to be bloated, overpriced, restrictive, DRM-infested spyware. We do not recommend using Windows Vista. We do not consider it a worthy product. And we do not intend to support Windows Vista per se, or to write software for it.”
I’m not surprised at this point that we’re devolving into passonate nonsense, but what I will say is that spyware is defined as software that installs itself without a users knowledge and is extremely difficult to detect or remove. I think Vista users know that Vista is loaded on their machines, it’s pretty easy to detect. Uninstall is also pretty straightforward, please feel free to pick another OS. Maybe you want XP? Oh … wait … no keep reading we haven’t gotten there yet.

“If you look at the newspaper flyers for national, US electronics stores, youll see that the base price for a cheap PC has gone from a bit over $300 to somewhere in the range of $600-$700. It will cost you about an extra $300 to buy the hardware necessary to support Vistas frivolous, and entirely superfluous, 3-D techno-kitsch.”
Yep absolutely, buying the latest hardware costs $$$. Do you remember when XP came out and everyone was complaining about hardware costs then? Now that 2 GB RAM is dirt cheap the next threshhold we want to reach with Vista is 4 GB. So no surprise it takes hardware manufacturers time to reduce production costs.

“And now they claim that you do not even have a right to use the product as you see fit.”
That’s right. You cannot buy a copy of Vista, pirate and distribute it to your friends. I’m sorry were you under the impression that that was legal? Let’s talk about books. Were you under the impression that you could make PDFs of books and distribute those freely? In what sense were you hoping to use Vista that the license prevents you from doing?

“It is due mainly to the quasi-legal restrictions and the spyware functionality that we recommend against using Windows Vista. ”
Ah … the quasi-legal restrictions that are probably the most legally-tested EULAs in the industry? Oh, wait, the spyware functionality again … that would be … ah … ? What was that?

“The average person using Vista under default settings will be disallowed from accessing most of the files on their computer! It is difficult for most software to run properly under those conditions.”
Sounds great for my home PC and both sets of parents. No complaints here, they can do what they need to do and I can set up my login with better rights because I know how. And I’m ok with that. So are they.

“But this restriction means that you bought a product and are blocked from using that product as you see fit … With Windows Vista you are blocked. You have no more control over the actual operating system than you do over your cable TV box.”
Again in what way are you hoping use Vista? Were you hoping to become a reseller or a distributor of some sort? Personally, I hate it when the cable companies put those weird screws on their cable boxes, it makes breaking them open so difficult … darn you Comcast!!

“This started with Windows XP: The Windows XP system is designed to lie to you in order to control your actions. Even if you run Window XP as administrator, with full rights, Windows will still hide Registry keys; it will still pretend to let you delete files even though you will be blocked from doing so; it will go through the motions of removing force-installed software like Windows Media Player, but the software is not actually removed.”
As Gandalf the Grey was elevated to White, brining him closer to understanding the nature of the universe, so now I understand the author at JSWare. This is not about Vista. This is about Microsoft. Oh boy, I wish I had known that earlier.

“And in many cases where settings can be adjusted, those settings are ’secret’ - unpublished and only known to a few.”
And all secrets shall be henseforth edited from the evil Google search engine, and therefore we shall deny future generations the benefits of our wisdom and experience.

“The changes in XP and Vista are actually aimed at protecting your PC from you, rather than vice versa.”
I think there’s something wrong here … I’m sorry was I supposed to be protecting my PC?

“The idea is that eventually you will use Windows mainly for things that pay Microsoft: Movie and music rentals, software rentals, etc.”
Wow, I really had no idea Microsoft was getting into the movie and music business, are you an insider or something?

“In brief, our view is that Windows Vista is an unsuitable and unusable product for its purpose. Rather than wasting everyones time with support requests that cant be helped, we decided that it makes more sense to simply block Vista support altogether. With most of the free JSWare programs and components, if you try to use them on Vista you will see a message saying that Windows Vista is not supported and the software will then either stop responding or will close itself.”
Duh. Look if you guys write shareware you probably don’t have the bandwidth to learn Vista. That’s ok guys but I’ve spent ~30 minutes in total reading the diatribe and feeling impelled to respond. I don’t blame you for not keeping up, I’m sure you write great stuff. But don’t blame Vista ok? Or at least install and use Vista and then write something up? I’d actually recommend dropping Microsoft support entirely since it’s obvious to me at least that you think their business practices are unfair; you’re entitled to that opinion and I encourage you to act accordingly.

MadJeff, I’m glad you like Vista - it takes all kinds to make a world.

As to your comments about SaaS - it is indeed ALL ABOUT money. Do you really think that if we licensed XP or Vista or 7 or whatever else from MS that we’d be getting updates more frequently? I don’t. I know I’d expect it, but seriously MS is just not up to the task. Case in point - It has been over 4 months since the big problems with Windows Home Server were exposed, and there are still no fixes. The last word I saw was a possible set of fixes by June. That will be a cycle of over 6 months for a MAJOR FLAW, built from Win2003 server, not from the ground up. Clearly the innovators at MS are gone (if there ever were any - MS typically BUYS someone elses code and then offers it up for public consumption.)

Thanks for the time taken to comment, I don’t agree with much of what you say, but thanks for expressing it, and come back anytime.

What Do You Think?

 


Anti-Spam Image

Want to Start a Blog Here for Free?

Are you an expert in one subject or another? If your goal is to help others and dispense hard-earned information back to the community, stake a claim on your very own Lockergnome blog today! You can write about anything - no matter the topic. Sign-up to start blogging!

63 queries / 0.350 seconds.