WiMAX: The Darling of CES
- 2
- Add a Comment
Almost every site that has been reporting on the Consumer Electronics Show has had an article on the continuing saga of WiMAX. It is a technology that shows promise, but really has never had its worst case scenarios exposed to the light of day. My personal opinion is because Sprint is the major force behind the project, and like the rollout of its PCS phone network, much ado was made of all the benefits without allowing proper time to be spent on the drawbacks of the system - and the many places that were not covered, the WiMAX rollout should be a very careful undertaking.
Sprint has a bad reputation for over promising and under delivering, so it might be best if they picked up a couple of partners, not just to shoulder the enormous cost load, but also to bring some sanity to the picture.
The idea of WiMAX is great, and the rollout should be slow, steady, and solid - none of these words usually apply to any Sprint endeavor.
The decision makers at Sprint should move cautiously, making sure that each area on the map has high quality, complete, and non-problematic service before progressing to the next area. Customer experience will sell or destroy the system. Positive experiences will cause a clamor for the services, but will also assure those waiting that the waiting time is worthwhile. Negative experiences will remove the desire for most, if not all, and the efforts will be for naught.
Let’s hope that in the last 10 years the executives at Sprint have learned a few lessons about service.
-
[tags] Sprint, WiMAX, rollout, service areas, quality of service, PCS [/tags]

2 Comments
Chris
January 13th, 2008
at 12:27pm
I am not really sure why you are saying Sprint is the company that is really pushing for the WiMAX conversion. Clearwire has had WiMAX running in Portland OR for over a year in testing. Sprint might be scatter shot in its testing for this deployment, but please realize that other company’s are probably going to release to the public first, and yes they HAVE been testing the new technology.
Now having said that, to be honest, there are going to be bugs no matter who gets to market first. From how you wrote this article, it looks like you glossed over the fact that no matter how hard you check and test things, some stuff is going to be overlooked.
the oracle
January 14th, 2008
at 2:53am
Chris, it was my understanding that Clearwire was doing any and all testing in conjunction with Sprint. The articles (at least 2 spelled it out that way) stated that Sprint and Clearwire were in a joint venture, and the last one I read about it stated that Clearwire was pulling out, leaving Sprint to go it alone.
That being said, I DON’T believe that flaws are a necessary evil - not to the customer - that is why a good company will completely ’science out’ the problems before signing customer number 1.