Revelations From An Unwashed Brain
Lockergnome
Home

Archive for November, 2007

Lost Without a Connection

Well, this last week has been a glimpse at what life was like in the eighties - without an internet connection.

The kind folks at Verizon decided to shut off the DSL connection to my house for reasons that have yet to be established. The strange thing about the shut off is that it takes but one minute to sever the connection, but much, much longer to to restore it. It’s as if we need an act of Congress to get a connection restored.

Of course, once the loss of connection is reported a complete run down of the list of stupid things that might happen to cause loss of connection must be gone through with the Indian named ‘Joe’ who tries to relay why changing the phone cord end for end, when we both know it is a straight through cable, is necessary. This would not be so bad if you could hear more than every third syllable he is speaking, and the the thickness of his accent could be filtered by the satellite distortion - so much for digital connectivity being superior…

A long and amazing story for another time….

 

Happy Thanksgiving everyone.

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Microsoft Family Pack Licenses

Well, it isn’t really called that. However, that is the effect, and it seems to be a better deal than the Apple version.

As I was looking over an entry by Ed Bott, at ZDNet, concerning Vista activation, number of times, phone or internet, etc., I saw this –

For nearly a year, Microsoft has refused to release technical details of the changes it made to its Product Activation technology in Windows Vista. The company was more than willing to speak in broad terms about the program and how it works, but it kept the details confidential, classifying them as trade secrets.

Until last week, that is. A newly released Technical Market Bulletin entitled Product Activation for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 unexpectedly appeared on Microsoft’s Download Center last week. Curiously, the document was dated September 2007, but the Date Published field indicates that it was kicking around internally for more than a month before being officially released.

The document is similar in many respects to the Technical Market Bulletin: Microsoft Product Activation for Windows XP (Word .doc format), released in August 2001, before the launch of Windows XP, and updated in 2002 after Microsoft made some activation changes in XP Service Pack 1.

Historically, the underlying principle of Product Activation has been simple: You can reinstall Windows on the original hardware as many times as you like and activate it automatically over the Internet. You need to reactivate over the phone if the hardware is substantially changed. That’s been the hard-and-fast rule for more than six years.

With that history in mind, I was surprised (to put it mildly) when I read this sentence on the next-to-last page of the Vista activation bulletin:

Reinstallation of Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008 on the same or similar hardware and a subsequent reactivation can be accomplished five times.

If that’s true, it’s a major change in policy for Microsoft. I went back through all my notes and records looking for any indication that this policy has been announced previously and found nothing. So I contacted Microsoft to get an explanation and got an impressively rapid response from Alex Kochis, Senior Product Manager in the Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) group. His blunt response: “There has been no meaningful policy change. We need to correct that paper.”

The new activation document, it turns out, is missing some crucial details. A more complete description of the actual activation policy is found at the bottom of Microsoft’s Windows Vista Activation FAQ:

How many times can I activate Windows Vista?

Windows can be activated any number of times, but your re-activation experience will vary based on the way you acquired Windows.

If you acquired Windows Vista via retail purchase (boxed product), you may activate via the Internet the first five times. Subsequent activations are allowed but must be completed via telephone.

If you acquire Windows Vista pre-installed on a computer, re-installation would not require additional activation steps unless significant hardware changes were made.

And even that description, Kochis explains, is potentially misleading. The policy allowing five automatic activations over the Internet has been in place for the past year, but it’s subject to change at any time. The real goal, it turns out, is to block hackers who try to spoof parts of the hardware ID so that multiple systems can appear identical when they check in with Microsoft’s activation servers. In that scenario, the server logs for a single product ID might show hundreds or even thousands of activation requests, leading to a requirement that the system be activated over the phone. In that scenario, a customer service representative can confirm that the activation request is legitimate.

For systems sold from large manufacturers (Dell, HP, Sony, and the like), activation is accomplished using a separate check called OEM Activation 2.0. If you reinstall Windows using the original media, activation should never be required unless the motherboard is replaced with one from a different manufacturer. The limit of five reactivations should only apply to retail copies, and then it will likely affect only hard core enthusiasts who repeatedly reinstall and attempt to reactivate retail copies.

 

Okay, now that you’ve slogged your way through that, here is the good news for your effort –

If you fall into the latter category, here are three pieces of advice to avoid being bitten by activation hassles:

1. Take advantage of the initial 30-day grace period before activating. Delay activation until you’re satisfied that all hardware and software are working as you intended.

2. Use an image backup program like Vista’s Complete PC Backup (found in the Business and Ultimate editions) or a third-party alternative like Acronis True Image. After installing Windows and all current updates (including drivers), complete activation and then use the backup program to create a snapshot of the drive. If you ever need to reinstall, you can do so easily with that image, which won’t require reactivation if it’s restored to the original hardware.

3. If you’re such a fanatic that you install Windows more than five times a year, get a TechNet Plus subscription. For $299, you get a one-year subscription that includes perpetual licenses for every version of Windows Vista (including Ultimate), Windows XP Professional, Microsoft Office, and a slew of server software and tools. The licenses aren’t valid for business use, but you can install and use each product on up to 10 separate machines for evaluation purposes, and the licenses don’t expire even if you choose not to renew your subscription after the first year.

Now that you’ve picked yourself back up from the floor…

This appears to be a totally legitimate way to put Windows (of any recent type) on 10 machines around your house. And no more reactivation hassles if you like to tinker - like me. $30 per machine… better grab this fast, before the lawyers tell Darth Ballmer about the mistake.

-

Share this post :

Tags: , , , ,

AT&T Takes Steps to Join the Filtered Crowd

www.fishseo.com_blog_wp-content_uploads_2007_03_att-logo-marker-bg Your World, through Our Lenses!

AT&T has made another move away from net neutrality today, by investing in a little known company called Vobile.

Vobile’s main product is something it calls VideoDNA. The product produces a ‘watermark’ for every frame of video content, and is said to be very durable, surviving all manner of transformations.

The problem is not so bad because of the filtering of copyrighted content - no one seriously thinks a claim can be made to allow piracy - but the filtering technology just needs a little tweak here and there to eliminate the type of content AT&T decides is ‘bad for us to receive’.

Since AT&T owns much of the Internet backbone, a few well placed filters could really mess things up for many who depend on P2P applications to transfer legitimate content.

(Since this is a major way of distributing open source software, and specifically Linux distributions, it is not such a far stretch of the imagination to think Microsoft may just have a small hand in this.)

-

Share this post :

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Open Document Foundation Dissolves

image could the evil Darth Ballmer be at work here?

The Open Document Foundation has disappeared (has been disappeared?), with no sign of the pages that were hosted by Google. There were warnings of this last month, but this is very strange.

There is, in the dust a new ‘device’ called the Compound Document Format, which appears to be rising from the ashes.

full story here

-

Share this post :

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

John, You’ve Got It Right Again!

Every now and then, something in the tech news escapes me. I read the regular magazines and tech journals voraciously, but sometimes life intervenes.

I went back through the writings on Lockergnome and see no one has referred to this or commented, so I will, because it is so on point.

John C. Dvorak has been writing for PC Magazine for at least as many years as I’ve cared about computers, so he is one of those who really can attest to seeing it all.

In a recent article he spoke of the Vista Death Watch, and why it is happening. Once again he sums up things well, with no vitriol, but no sugar and spice either.

 image

Microsoft has extended the life of Windows XP because Vista has simply not shown any life in the market. We have to begin to ask ourselves if we are really looking at Windows Me/2007, destined to be a disdained flop. By all estimates the number of Vista installations hovers around the number of Macs in use.

How did this happen? And what’s going to happen next? Does Microsoft have a Plan B? A number of possibilities come to mind, and these things must be considered by the company itself.

So what went wrong with Vista in the first place? Let’s start off with the elephant in the room. The product was overpriced from the outset. Why was it so expensive? What was special about it? All the cool and promised features of the original vision of Longhorn were gutted simply because it was beyond Microsoft’s capability to implement those features.

This failure to deliver what was promised—even after several delays in the product’s release, by the way—did nothing to excite anyone. It made the company look bad. It directly resulted in a no-confidence vote that was manifested in a lackluster reception and low sales. Microsoft should have scrapped the project two years ago and instead patched XP until it could deliver something hot.

To make things worse, there are too many versions. Exactly what is the point of that? Don’t we all just want Vista Ultimate? The other versions seem like a way to maybe save money for some users who cannot afford to get the real thing. You can be certain this version glut results only in complaints about what each variation is missing.

Microsoft’s initial approach to marketing this turkey was obviously going to be to put it on just new machines, which would eventually saturate the market, but the PC manufacturers squawked and demanded the continuation of XP sales. Though there is some chatter about how Linux could use this lull in the Microsoft juggernaut to make some real headway onto the desktop, this is unlikely to happen. But Microsoft, with all its paranoid thinking, might have believed it to be possible. So XP is still with us and will be until deep into next year.

I should mention here that much of this mess, I strongly believe, is due to Microsoft’s recent obsession with Google and online search. Now Microsoft wants to be in the advertising business because Google is in the advertising business. Meanwhile, it can’t do its real job.

After that, he gives his suggestions on what could, and should be done. I’m not sure anyone at Microsoft will agree, nor any person with less invested in seeing things done completely correctly, but the ideas are a start…

the ideas for change at Microsoft (Vista)

-

Share this post :

Tags: , , , ,

Dell & Sun Smoke Peace Pipe - Dell to Offer Solaris 10

At Oracle OpenWorld in San Francisco, today Dell and Sun announced a multi-year agreement to have Dell distribute Sun’s Solaris 10 operating system.

This is outstanding news for both companies, as well as their customers. Solaris is a true Unix, for those who care, and the deal with Dell means a wide network to get Sun into its own light.

This is also one of those win-win-win propositions, because I’m sure Mr. Ballmer is having to be sedated right about now, as more Unix and Linux choices means fewer Windows licenses.

Both Solaris and Open Solaris will be offered on Dell servers, and full support will be available for both from Dell.

Dell joins IBM in its offering of Solaris on servers, and H-P also gives users the choice on some of its current line-up.

Solaris enjoys wide acceptance and usability, with its support for Intel, AMD, and SPARC processors.

-

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this post :

Tags: , , , , , ,

XM - Sirius Merger Draws Nearer

The XM shareholders have overwhelmingly approved the decision to merge with Sirius, making for one, and only one satellite music network.

Apparently the eyes on Wall Street lit up as well, as the stock price of XM surged with the news.

www.ultimate-sounds.com_sirius-logo

 

 

 

 

www.xmfan.com_files_xm_112 

Is this what’s known as ’screwing the pooch’?

Both entities are spewing much drivel about the benefits to the consumer space with this blending of the satellite broadcast vendors. The benefits are apparently so easily seen, that no one bothers to enumerate said benefits.

The FCC and the Justice Dept have been accordingly swayed (bought?) to favor the merger, so it seems to be a foregone conclusion.

My question is “When was the last time lack of competition helped free enterprise in any way?”

-

Tags: , , , , , ,

‘Antiquated PC’ Sells Out

While many were quick to criticize the very inexpensive Everex PC sold at WalMart as a dinosaur in the land of tomorrow, it seems that Joe and Jane Average Citizen have voted with their pocketbooks and made the little PC that could a sell out.

The units will continue to be made, so don’t fret.

image WalMart didn’t bet against the popularity of this little gem, and you are the benefactor!

The very strange thing about this is that so many were quick to dismiss the unit as not being able to effectively run Vista, while those same people were speaking of the eventual rise of the completely utilitarian PC. Were they caught not looking both ways at the corner?

The motherboard that is the heart of the system is not CPU upgradeable, but has room for up to 2GB of DDR2 memory, and has 2 PCI slots for expansion. It also has a floppy interface, 2 ATA 133 interfaces, and 2 SATA interfaces (ATA7). The southbridge is an 8237R, so compatibility should not be a problem for many peripherals - which is one criticism I saw leveled at the system when it was first spoken about.

Another thing that WalMart gets, and apparently the pundits don’t give buyers credit for, it that this PC is GREEN, with maximum CPU draw of 20W. This is very good for those who wish to keep the PC on all the time - you don’t have to feel bad about liking that convenience.

The motherboard should see a life unlike its mini-ITX brethren, as it is not exorbitantly priced. This has, in my opinion, been the straw that breaks the camel’s back for many wanting a really small PC.

I will not be surprised to see this in a DTX case used as a firewall, firewall router, file server, or print server.

For those not minding the larger Everex case, the system will be great for small children, as a bedroom system, or for a PC for older adults wanting a use-it-and-not-worry system. Those with an eye on specs will realize that this will run Windows Home Server just fine thank you - a memory upgrade, which is extremely cheap right now, and a couple of terabyte SATA drives, and you’re all set for the long term.

Cheers to WalMart, for knowing the mind of the larger public, and cheers to VIA, for knowing that megawatt CPUs are not needed for every task.

-

Tags: , , , ,

Virtual News in a Virtual World?

image Second Life seems to be bringing all sorts of things into the fold. For all those who don’t have enough reality to keep them busy, they can now go to Second Life and get some fake news under the brand of CNN.

image Along with the fake news, CNN wishes to sprinkle in some user generated content, as it is asking for pictures from camera phones, computers, and just about any other digital source.

image

from CNN

When Second Life residents observe an in-world event they deem newsworthy, they can take snapshots, shoot video, or write a report about the event and submit to CNN.

Submissions selected by CNN I-Report producers will go back into Second Life for residents to view throughout the virtual world. SL I-Reports may also be viewed and discussed in the real world at CNN.com’s SL I-Report Blog.

CNN’s in-world I-Report hub includes a news desk where CNN producers will hold weekly editorial discussions, and an amphitheater for larger in-world events, such as training sessions and appearances by CNN anchors and correspondents.

 

And they wonder why the county is going to hell in a bucket…

(I can hear the strains of the Grateful Dead now!)

-

Tags: , , ,

Litigation, the New Pastime

So many things technical are being litigated these days, it is hard to keep up. As I’ve stated before, it seems that the primary reason for all the legal activity is the lack of money all these multi-million dollar corporations are bringing in, so the plan is to take some from a few multi-billion dollar corporations.

Now Google, a corporation that has a few extra millions, is the target of both Jarg Corporation, and Northeastern University. It seems that Northeastern holds a patent that it licensed to Jarg Corporation, and these entities have decided that Google is now infringing on said patent.

The suit, from a Boston law firm that wants to remain anonymous, claims that the principals from Jarg became aware of the infringement 2.5 years ago, but did nothing until now.

This begs the question “What triggered the lawsuit at this time and place?”. Could it possibly be the announcement of Google’s latest worth, and the per share stock price? Also, how did these people become aware of the infringement - were they privy to inside information?

Stranger and stranger…

-

Tags: , , ,

1 2 3 ... 999999