E-Mail:

Windows XP Not Perfect

In a time when many are being very vocal about the shortcomings of Windows Vista, it seems strange to many to admit that Windows XP is not yet perfect.

It isn’t.

As this is being written, the computer where the composition is taking place is running strong after nine days of up time. During the nine day span 77 GB of data has been downloaded, articles for three different blogs have been written, over 3000 e-mails have been received and either read or rejected, and 12 DVDs have been burned.

During much of the day, processes are taking place that require no user intervention, so there are small gaps in the work for playing games. This machine is really not suited for first person shooters of today, as the video card is an FX5500 with only 256 MB of memory. The games played are card games, puzzles, and the like.

I became aware of a problem I had not seen, in years, yesterday. I tried to bring up a Checkers game, which I have had since the days of Windows 98. It was one of the freebies from PC Magazine [remember those?] and it plays fine, so I’ve kept it. When I tried to use the game, I got a message about the Win 16 subsystem not having enough resources! Talk about ‘deja vu all over again’! At the time I tried this, there was over a GB of the 2GB memory available on the machine.

Of course, I know the problem.

The memory does not get released completely by the Checkers application, so after a while, the stack space is not available to start a program. Thank goodness for the better programming practices of Windows XP, as now I’m only mildly annoyed. Instead of being frustrated, and losing data when forced to reboot by errors, or saving work and rebooting - that way only losing time, I can continue unimpeded, until the time I feel I really have to play that game.

In a time of so much carping about Windows Vista, it is nice to know that for most things Windows XP gets it right, and that perhaps the frustration noted above is only one of a few problems with this operating system.

I can only imagine what might take place if we were making a transition from Windows 98, or Me, directly to Vista. How much hair would be getting pulled out of the average user’s head?

On the other hand, perhaps the opposite would be true for many. Vista might be less exasperating [for those who could fully exploit their peripherals] than having to know you’re going to be rebooting a few times per day with 98 or Me.

With all that we tend to revile Microsoft for, it is worth noting that Windows XP is the best we have gotten from them since the days of DOS 5.0.

[tags] Microsoft, Windows, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Win 16 subsystem, MS DOS 5, operating system [/tags]

2 Comments

…and we all love saying “This is as good as it gets!” don’t we? “Patooie and maybe Fie on XP and don’t even think of that other one, um, the “newer-better-yeah-right” one, much less mention it. I’m upgrading my Win2K alright…
To Linux. Oh, I’ll keep some sort of Windows box for as long as I can legally do so without giving “Big Bother” (you know, “MicroWhozit”) any more money but I’ll be keeping in mind that “Big Bother is Watching” and behave accordingly.

That is the thing MS will be finding out this time…XP is good enough for most people, unlike Vista, it offered much better use of more advanced hardware, yet did not break the bank when making the transition. This time, more people will stay with XP, well past the last day of MS support. All it takes is the download of all the stuff online, and then you have your own method of support.

This is one place where IBM got it right, and MS does not seem to get it. newer OS/2 fixpacks were available for years after IBM stopped selling the OS, and the fixpacks can still be found online at IBM.com today. MS removes the files for older stuff, again forcing people to abandon what works.

Just think how many of the problems with XP could be fixed by MS in five more years…but any real development for XP stopped right after SP2. This is also shown by the fact that many things from XP can be made to work with XP, but MS purposely makes it difficult. [ A prime example is Windows Defender...it works with 2000 if you know how to get it installed. If you look inside the setup file there is a line which looks at the version of Windows, and if the answer doesn't come back >5, it won't install]

What Do You Think?

 

Want to Start a Blog Here for Free?

Are you an expert in one subject or another? If your goal is to help others and dispense hard-earned information back to the community, stake a claim on your very own Lockergnome blog today! You can write about anything - no matter the topic. Sign-up to start blogging!

75 queries / 1.159 seconds.