After an online journey to National Review Online this morning, and later looking at competing articles on MSNBC and AOL, I noticed a curious thing. A blog seems to have the power to sway thought without any reference to facts.
For those espousing something not popular this may be a real boon, but how difficult is it, in this age of the Internet, to check facts? (As I typed this last sentence, the program I’m using shows me now that the word Internet should be capitalized — it’s respectable now, you know.)
It remains strange how writings, diverse in their premise, may continue to reference facts, which, in courtroom parlance, are not in evidence. Sometimes the facts are not given, but instead are alluded to, so they need not be backed by reference. This is how so much unsubstantiated nonsense gets into the public conscience.
I was reading an article in NRO [here] where the author concerns himself with the work of Rachel Carson, a pioneer in the ecology movement. In his eight paragraph article, he gives citations that judge her work as irresponsible, as he attributes many deaths from malaria to her pushing for the discontinuation of the widespread use of DDT as an insecticide. No reference is made as to why other pesticides have not been used, just the inference that without DDT, millions of people would otherwise be alive. This is an instance where incomplete facts are used to sway the reader, because complete facts would neither be so simple, nor as persuasive.
In yet another article on NRO [here] a different author cites the fact that no refineries have been built in the United States since 1976, again hoping that the reader will leap to the conclusion that the ‘left-wing, tree-hugging, Al Gore-lovin’ liberals have caused this problem. After a quick lookup on Google, it becomes apparent in cited facts [here], footnoted at the bottom of the article, that the Liberal factions in this country have had little to do with the lack of refinery building permits. This was not the desired result of the ‘fact’ in the NRO article.
As long as half truths, and assumptions made with incomplete evidence are allowed to stand, unchallenged, the vast numbers that make up the ‘unwashed masses’ will continue to bounce back and forth between the ranting of the two factions, all the while believing that both must be ‘crazy’ and no action need be taken.
Tags: national review online, msnbc, aol, portal, rachel carson, ecology movement, ddt, pesticides, google
