Is Buying & Selling Facebook Friends and Twitter Followers a Waste of Time?

Posted by on Apr 24, 2011 | 21 Comments

Empire Avenue is a hot trendy new social media app that wants you to sell yourself and your social media soul. This “social stock market game” has you buying other people to connect with them for free. The idea is that instead of following or just being friends with other people, you buy shares to connect with people you are interested in, brands you love, or celebrities. Empire Ave actually launched last year, but has been busy the last few months revamping features to the point today’s users have an entirely new experience – and the concept is trying to go viral.

On Empire Avenue, you connect with your Facebook profile, followed by your LinkedIn, Twitter, Flickr, and YouTube accounts. Based on your activity and engagement with others, your profile is given a share price (or, what really amounts to a score.) People can then invest in you by giving you currency called Eaves. These people then own a virtual chunk of you, also called Eaves. As more people buy shares, your share price increases. Every day, you earn more Eaves based on your online activity – and people who own shares of you earn more too. Anyone can invest in any profile – whether you, or someone more famous – such as Justin Bieber.

empire avenue is a new social gameMonopoloy and Social Media. And that’s really what is at the heart of Empire Ave – game mechanics. While game mechanics that reward activity are already the next big thing (we saw several hot ideas at Launch earlier this year), we’ve already seen the rise, and starting to see the fall, of game mechanics in social media through apps like FourSquare. It was fun for a little while to “check in” for a badge, but at the end of the day (or really, at the end of last year) people realized there was nothing at the end of the road. A few check-in’s yielded a mayorship that earned you 10% of your daily mocha, but that was about it. Empire Ave utilizes a score in the form of fake money with more badges and the prize of “owning” your more famous Facebook friends and Followers – or buying those you wish to connect with. I cringe at yet another irrelevant “score”, and certainly don’t want to be “bought” by any friends or followers of mine (that’s just weird). If I want to make a connection with someone, there are more legitimate ways than offering money or bartering a social media “score” with them. That’s a little weird, too. Actually, it’s kind of asinine.

Empire Ave may yet succeed with those who just want to play the game – perhaps those who take social media a little less seriously. The problem is that Empire Ave is a a web-based app that layers on top of exisiting social media experiences. Social media engagement is already lowest during traditional 9-5, at-your-desk (or at school) hours. Unless Empire Ave kicks out an app, I can’t imagine people will have enough time to procrastinate enough to use the Web app at work, or have enough time at home to sit down and truly get into it without the addition of some farmland. I’m sure some 15 year old school girls would be a perfect market for the game – who wouldn’t want to try to buy Justin Bieber, afterall?

Is there really a point to buying and selling an interest in people? Is this the ultimate expression of your interest in someone or merely a stupid game? I think the app misses the point of using social media and even what game mechanics are evolving into (think more competition, less individual rewards). If you’ve tried Empire Ave out and think otherwise, though, leave a comment – I’m curious if anyone else is getting anything out of it.

  • http://www.whitehousevoice.com thoughtleader

    O. M. G. completely agree. What are they thinking? “missing the point” of social media is a mild criticism indeed.

  • Fodr Kreatr

    As if we didn’t think social networking could make the world any dumber, along comes this P.o.S. When will people realise real life is already a game and as Chris himself said ‘If you’re not paying for it you’re the product being sold’. What is this grotesque contraption but the pinnacle in lunacy of our day, that people are willing to dedicate their very lives to such vanity. If you spend your life long enough in a dream it will take hold as reality and reality will take hold as a dream. If this atrocity goes live, it could well send the world down the pan – not neccessarily a bad thing mind you…

  • Fodr Kreatr

    As if we didn’t think social networking could make the world any dumber, along comes this P.o.S. When will people realise real life is already a game and as Chris himself said ‘If you’re not paying for it you’re the product being sold’. What is this grotesque contraption but the pinnacle in lunacy of our day, that people are willing to dedicate their very lives to such vanity. If you spend your life long enough in a dream it will take hold as reality and reality will take hold as a dream. If this atrocity goes live, it could well send the world down the pan – not neccessarily a bad thing mind you…

  • http://www.anthonyguidetti.com Anthony Guidetti

    It’s my opinion that I want followers to like my content for them to follow me. I would rather have less followers who care about what I have to say than a million who don’t.

    • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

      That’s a good opinion. :)

      • http://www.anthonyguidetti.com Anthony Guidetti

        Even though it is pretty obvious to most, my cousin thinks it’s all about numbers. He looks at me crazy every time I tell him he should build up a real audience.

        • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

          You should really be looking at the number of lists a Twitter account is included within. That’s a far better metric than eleventy bajillion spammers.

    • http://www.evolve-pr.com Tom Ohle

      And that’s exactly our point on Empire Avenue :) . You can have a high share price by being engaged with a small number of followers; we’re trying to build a platform that will provide some SM metrics and new ways to engage for existing social media fanatics… but also to introduce the everyman (or everywoman) to social media. Lots of users have commented about how it’s encouraged them to go create a Twitter account (or actually use it), to finally start that blog they’ve wanted to make, etc.

      Sure, the buy/sell thing could be potentially off-putting, but the mechanics — at least this is our aim — encourage you to engage people across the social web. All about meeting new people who share your interests and establishing a “value” based relationship with them.

      • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

        Did you just spam?

        • http://www.evolve-pr.com Tom Ohle

          Did I? If I did, accept my apologies and confine my comment to the bottomless pits. Just trying to clarify the point of the site :) .

  • http://www.anthonyguidetti.com Anthony Guidetti

    It’s my opinion that I want followers to like my content for them to follow me. I would rather have less followers who care about what I have to say that a million who don’t.

    • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

      That’s a good opinion. :)

      • http://www.anthonyguidetti.com Anthony Guidetti

        Even though it is pretty obvious to most, my cousin thinks it’s all about numbers. He looks at me crazy every time I tell him he should build up a real audience.

        • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

          You should really be looking at the number of lists a Twitter account is included within. That’s a far better metric than eleventy bajillion spammers.

    • http://www.evolve-pr.com Tom Ohle

      And that’s exactly our point on Empire Avenue :) . You can have a high share price by being engaged with a small number of followers; we’re trying to build a platform that will provide some SM metrics and new ways to engage for existing social media fanatics… but also to introduce the everyman (or everywoman) to social media. Lots of users have commented about how it’s encouraged them to go create a Twitter account (or actually use it), to finally start that blog they’ve wanted to make, etc.

      Sure, the buy/sell thing could be potentially off-putting, but the mechanics — at least this is our aim — encourage you to engage people across the social web. All about meeting new people who share your interests and establishing a “value” based relationship with them.

      • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

        Did you just spam?

        • http://www.evolve-pr.com Tom Ohle

          Did I? If I did, accept my apologies and confine my comment to the bottomless pits. Just trying to clarify the point of the site :) .

  • Ozmodai

    It’s a game and it’s not even a very fun one. Being at the top of some sort of Internet pile doesn’t earn many bragging rights outside of that pile. The social aspects are faked just to raise the score.
    I’m about to go raise my score by spamming! Bye!

  • Ozmodai

    It’s a game and it’s not even a very fun one. Being at the top of some sort of Internet pile doesn’t earn many bragging rights outside of that pile. The social aspects are faked just to raise the score.
    I’m about to go raise my score by spamming! Bye!

  • http://www.WhatDidEricSay.com Eric Miltsch

    The “game” element is fun. The ultimate goal for the company behind it is obviously the “in-game” sales/upgrades available – buying more “eaves.”

    Spend real money to increase your portfolio value (so you buy shares in more people) – or – complete the free/paid “offers” such as buying a magazine subscription.

    It’s a clever affiliate model leveraging social gaming techniques; connections, awards, sharing, upgrades, time-based/expiration models, etc…it hits on several ego items.

    Problem is, the game element itself eventually wears thin. The formula behind a users stock price, as I understand it now, rewards you for your connections and consistent sharing- not quantity of sharing. So, unless an active user like Robert Scoble hangs up his SM sharing activites, his value could be infinite.

    Not sure what else is included to render a person’s value as overbought, or even oversold at the moment; and what about stock splits? Could Scoble become the social media share value equivalent to Berkshire Hathaway?

    I’ve seen a few nice examples of it being wisely for additional exposure. Besides the brands like Ford & Audi, Jay Baer is using it to help promote his book, w/Amber Nasland, The Now Revolutions by giving away one free copy each to those users who buy shares & tweet it…

  • http://www.WhatDidEricSay.com Eric Miltsch

    The “game” element is fun. The ultimate goal for the company behind it is obviously the “in-game” sales/upgrades available – buying more “eaves.”

    Spend real money to increase your portfolio value (so you buy shares in more people) – or – complete the free/paid “offers” such as buying a magazine subscription.

    It’s a clever affiliate model leveraging social gaming techniques; connections, awards, sharing, upgrades, time-based/expiration models, etc…it hits on several ego items.

    Problem is, the game element itself eventually wears thin. The formula behind a users stock price, as I understand it now, rewards you for your connections and consistent sharing- not quantity of sharing. So, unless an active user like Robert Scoble hangs up his SM sharing activites, his value could be infinite.

    Not sure what else is included to render a person’s value as overbought, or even oversold at the moment; and what about stock splits? Could Scoble become the social media share value equivalent to Berkshire Hathaway?

    I’ve seen a few nice examples of it being wisely for additional exposure. Besides the brands like Ford & Audi, Jay Baer is using it to help promote his book, w/Amber Nasland, The Now Revolutions by giving away one free copy each to those users who buy shares & tweet it…