Is Big Media Fudging On The Piracy Numbers? Could Be Says The GAO

Posted by on Apr 13, 2010 | 7 Comments

This may come as a shock to all of us but the government thinks that the people who provide the piracy numbers for big media, may be fudging a little or lot, depending on ones point of view. You see the government [General Accounting Office] seems to think that the numbers being provided may be inflated. How much are the numbers being inflated? No one really knows. But according to one article it states that:

“Three widely cited U.S. government estimates of economic losses resulting from counterfeiting cannot be substantiated due to the absence of underlying studies,” the GAO said. “Each method (of measuring) has limitations, and most experts observed that it is difficult, if not impossible, to quantify the economy-wide impacts.”

Though there is a general consensus that piracy can cause a drag on the economy and a loss of revenue, there are some folks who were interviewed who provided a positive effect of copying copyrighted materials.

“Some experts we interviewed and literature we reviewed identified potential positive economic effects of counterfeiting and piracy,” The GAO wrote. “Some consumers may knowingly purchase a counterfeit or pirated product because it is less expensive than the genuine good or because the genuine good is unavailable, and they may experience positive effects from such purchases.”

“Consumers may use pirated goods to ‘sample’ music, movies, software, or electronic games before purchasing legitimate copies,” the GAO continued. “(This) may lead to increased sales of legitimate goods.

As I originally stated, even the feds seem confused. What is also disturbing is that the report had no recommendations on how to stop piracy.  Seems kind of strange to me. Oh, I forgot, it is the government I am talking about. LOL

Conclusions: piracy is good and bad, all at the same time. Piracy is only sampling of music, movies or electronic games, before one decides to buy it. It is a crazy world we live in.

Pirates 1 Media 0

Comments welcome.

Source

  • Pingback: My Social Media for April 13th « ☺ | LockerGnome.net Lifestream

  • Pingback: How do You Fall Asleep? ~ Chris Pirillo

  • Dagoth Pie

    I will happily pay for anything that I download that turns out to be worth it, most music I download I’ll either buy and rip, or delete. Of course sometimes, you can’t buy copies of it so I have to make do with poor quality mp3s.

    Then there’s movies, which I do have to say not a lot of good ones have been released lately, some like Avatar had awesome special effects, but a really cliche storyline, reminded me of Pocahontas.

    As for games, same as for movies, the only game I was looking forward to was sims 3, which I downloaded seeing as it hadn’t been released to stores locally, and boy was I glad I tried it first, if a Linux version were released I’d buy it, but definately not worth the effort to reboot into windows imo.

    Maybe big companies will get the idea, that people will actually buy things worth it, I love Dragonforce and own all their albums (not technically, I just own rights to listen to them, I believe the CDs aren’t technically mine.). I’m planning on buying a PS3 specifically to play heavy rain, I tried it and loved it’s unique gameplay so it’s worth buying. Probably not, they’ll continue to declare themselves and their products as perfect.

  • http://twitter.com/NorCalExplorer NorCal Explorer

    Ok, I am cancelling my aol email account. This is proof AOL has gone to the dark side.

  • Allan Shand

    Do I hear a flash boycott?

  • Allan Shand

    Do I hear a flash boycott?

  • http://twitter.com/EnvoyOfTheEnd Ian Bunting

    It is certainly someting Adobe, and those utilising the technology should be more open about and should make more transparant.
    Afterall how many people would think of looking at flash when trying to remove tracking or other potentially identifying information.