Gates - Obama More ‘Analytical’ Than Bush?
- 3
- Add a Comment
Defense Secretary Robert Gates is the only hold over from the George W. Bush administration, now serving President Obama. So on the TV program Meet The Press, was anyone really surprised when Gates said that Obama was more ‘analytical’ than Bush? He also stated that Obama actually listens to everyone in the room. WOW! How shocking!
Tell us something that the majority of America didn’t know already. Tell us the real reason that Obama beat the pants off of McCain in the election. Could it be that America saw McCain as nothing more than a Bush pawn? A patsy who would carry out the same old failed policies that Bush followed? A know it all that wouldn’t even listen to his own people and chose Palin as a running mate?
The new voice for the Republican party is Rush Limbaugh. Great choice! This man wants Obama and his policies to fail. Hello. If Obama fails, our country fails.
Robert Gates should be saluted for his honesty and candor.
Comments welcome.
3 Comments
the oracle
March 2nd, 2009
at 6:25pm
Hi, Jackie.
I was wondering, as I watched the same interview, if Gates is leaving before the end of the first term due to differences of opinion or mere fatigue from the job.
BTW, did you see Gates on Charlie Rose? I am watching that much more than things on network television, as especially on MTP, David Gregory simply doesn’t ask the questions I want answers to.
President Obama has certainly tried to make this administration more bipartisan than any I’ve seen in my lifetime. He has put out the hand, the other side isn’t cooperating.
Zachary
March 3rd, 2009
at 11:35am
Has anyone here read obama’s book? He admits in his book that bipartisanship means one party being the other party’s bit$*. He admits this himself. If people wanted bipartisanship, then you should ask every member of congress who the most bipartisan senator is… John McCain. My opinion is I didn’t like either candidate but if people truly wanted bipartisanship they’d have voted mccain.
the oracle
March 4th, 2009
at 11:21am
@Zachary - could you give the actual citation please?