Call For Enforcement of Food Safety Guidelines

Posted by on Feb 19, 2008 | 11 Comments

The current beef recall is just another in a series of recalls that should make the consumer concerned about the safety of the foods that they are buying. Just this last October, 2007, Topps Meat Co. had a massive frozen hamburger recall after 25 people were sickened by the meat in eight states. In all this recall of meat that was on the market for human consumption resulted in 21.7 million lbs of ground beef being recalled. Just think how many people did or could have consumed this contaminated meat and how many may have been seriously sickened or died as a result of the meat industries focus on profit rather than on the good of the consumer.

The worst part of it all is that the product in the above recall was contaminated with e-coli. In e-colis worst form children are especially vulnerable to die in a slow and painful manner. This is especially frightening when one considers that this was enough meat to feed a McDonald’s regular hamburger to every adult in the United States and since children love the smaller hamburgers each of us was subjected to the possibility of losing someone we love when we purchased one for ourselves or our children. No wonder I have avoided ground beef as much as possible for the last several years.

Next one must wonder how long it took to notify the public of the supposed danger. According to the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, which oversees the industry, the meat in question was presented to the public in late June or July of 2007 and the E.coli began making people sick in August. However, it took an additional six weeks for the first recall to be issued. So, between the Federal Food and Drug Administration and the Dept of Agriculture, both of whom are charged with keeping our food supply safe, I must wonder if any of us is really safe.

Voices from all over the nation, including the Consumers Union are decrying the delay that began with a small recall only to be expanded by 600 times within a matter of days. One victim was Samantha Safranek, a fifteen year old, who nearly lost her life over eating one tainted burger. However, our fears cannot rest solely around tainted meats but appear to also encompass items like spinach and salad mixes. Could these outbreaks be intentional forms of terrorism? That is unlikely. It is more probable that the contamination is the result of poor standards and cost cutting measures being employed by food manufacturers throughout the U.S. and poor oversight by those agencies charged with protecting the consumer.

As if this recall wasn’t sufficient to wake up the food industry it is only four months later and we find ourselves facing yet another recall. This time from Chino-based Westland/ Hallmark meats based in Southern California. This recall is the largest ever to hit the United States and a scramble is on to try to make sure that none of the tainted meat hits children’s lunchboxes. However, it is thought that the majority of the 143 million lbs of beef targeted in this latest recall has most likely already been consumed.

What is causing this repeated contamination of our meat supply? It appears that animal rights activists have taken objection to the terrible animal abuse taking place at the slaughter houses. Yes, we all know that the animals must be sacrificed to provide food for the consumer but most of us thought that at least their deaths were humanely done. Apparently, this is not the case in this latest round of recalls where it appears that the animals were so sick that they could not even stand up. When that occurred the worked stabbed the animals in their eyes and used fork lifts and dragging chains to force the animals into the slaughter pens. Frightenly, the investigation further revealed that the company did not routinely contact a veterinarian when cattle became non-ambulatory, after passing inspection, violating health regulations resulting in all of the meat processed being deemed unfit for human consumption.

To fight back Americans need to call for testing of every lot of meat that is produced to ensure its safety for consumption, something which is not required today. Let’s band together to force the public entities entrusted with the safety of our food supply to comply with federal regulations and punish them severely for accepting graft and/or failing to do their job. I for one feel that the safety of my family should take precedence over the profits of the company producing the food supply.

[tags]Federal Food and Drug Administration, FDA, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beef recall, Topps Meat Company, Westland/Hallmark meats, animal abuse, slaughter houses, food safety, food supply, e-coli[/tags]

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=586041282 Andy Tickner

    Nice concept, but putting some privacy into the app would be far better; i.e. allow users to select specific folders, or only photo’s taken via the app.

  • Anonymous

    They’re trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. And trying to change my behavior instead of enhance it.

    - If I want friends to see my pictures, I post them to Facebook.

    - If I want the world (or my “elastic network”) to see my pictures, I post them to Twitter.

    I can’t think of a reason I would want random other people near me on the street or in a restaurant to see the picture I just took. The only possible answer – bragging rights. Like “hey, I just took the best angle of that home run that 5000 of you also took!” Um, who cares?

    I also don’t need any more deal sites or coupons. I’m already bored with Groupon and LivingSocial.

    And yeah, the ability to see all of my photos on my phone is simply a no-go.

    I hate to be so negative. I am though, because I see Color as a symptom of a greater problem – it appears our industry has not learned the lessons of the past and are doomed to repeat.

    • DMG

      You could have said the same thing about Facebook or Twitter when they first came out:

      -”If I want friends to see my pictures, I email them individually”

      -”If I want the world to see my pictures, I post them to my website”

      Facebook/Twitter didn’t solve a problem anyone was struggling with – they just gave easier, centralized, and more seamless ways to do things we could do already.

      Many people still do these things the old way. Many proposed “new ways” never take off. You might never use Color. 50 million people who are not you might. Nobody might. I’d say it’s too soon to tell.

      • Uesty

        The Facebook/Twitter examples you mention are things that people already did, but these services made easier. You can email your friends photos, but it’s quicker and easier to use Facebook. You can post photos to your website, but it’s quicker and easier to use Twitter.

        Color isn’t about making something you do already quicker and easier. It’s about getting people to do something they haven’t (AFAICT) wanted to do.

        Perhaps sending photos to strangers based on location is something people do want to do (I don’t, and I don’t know why anyone would, but OK, maybe it is) — but that has nothing at all to do with the success of Facebook or Twitter.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t think you get it.

    The only photos of mine that get shared with you are those taken when you were in the vicinity, which means you would have been able to see said “shenanigans” with your own eyes. And nothing forces me to always use Color when taking photos. I’d only use it exactly when I want to share photos with the people around me also sharing photos.

    • http://profiles.google.com/chris.l.holden Chris Holden

      In my testing that doesn’t seem to be accurate. Photos taken one one device far away from another device (with color, in their own group) are available as a group to join on the 2nd device once the two devices are brought into proximity.

    • Xmp

      It’s ALL your pictures on your phone, not only those you took now.

    • Uesty

      If there really are “shenanigans” going down, wouldn’t people save a copy (by taking a screenshot, if nothing else) and post it on Facebook/Twitter anyway? You can’t limit the spread of digital photos.

  • Xmp

    Seeing is one thing, and can be excited. Can pictures be downloaded, like in saved from other users phones?

  • http://twitter.com/doimpromptu doimpromptu

    The basic idea of color.com is cool – bringing people together in a spontaneous and fun way, based on a common experience (e.g. a local event) – just the execution is really, really poor. And from what Bill plans as an “enhancement”, things will get even worse.

    So, sorry to say, but the money for the color.com domain alone would have been enough as an investment to push this experiment out in the wild.

    There are other local social mobile apps like the stealth startup http://doimpromptu.com that take on a similar goal (“get together with friends and awesome others around you.”), but do a better job with less money: immediately after registration you’re starting with the full experience of checkins and events of your friends AND your friends of friends AND other event attendees – this never leaves you lonely and gives you enough interesting strangers to follow and expand your “real life social network”.

    Quite similar to color.com DoImpromptu learns over time with whom you’re usually hanging around, but also shows you people that visit the same events and locations as you do and that you’ve never been talking to before.

    And that’s where the user experience becomes really cool: seeing WHO is with you in the same location (not just a nameless pic), knowing WHERE and with WHOM else they usually go out, and where you can potentially MEET them again. That’s enough information to decide if you’re interested to get in touch with this person in “real life”.

    I’m looking forward to see who finally gets “local social mobile” right…

  • http://twitter.com/neilawatson Neil Watson

    I couldn’t agree more with you. Some of the scenarios I’ve read where Color “adds value” aren’t just creepy, they are plain wrong.

    If people start using Color (and therefore their phones) in restaurants then that ruins my experience. Have we reached a point yet where enough is enough in terms of gadget-augmented-life?

    Anyway, great article, I’ve just linked to you from my post on this very subject!