E-Mail:
Get our new Windows 7 eBook (PDF) for $7 with 70+ Tips. Download Now!

George Tenet Claims Bush Used 9/11 As An Excuse To Attack Iraq

  • No Related Post

George Tenet, former CIA chief, in his remarkable memoir, At the Center of the Storm, provides literally damning evidence about 9/11 and the Iraq War beginning with his description of a meeting with Condoleezza Rice, then national security adviser, two months before the 9/11 terrorist attacks. This meeting was called because of intelligence that Tenet received on July 10, 2001, about an al-Qaeda threat that he claims, “literally made his hair stand on end.”

According to At the Center of the Storm, Tenet with his counterterrorism deputy, Cofer Black, and a briefer known only as “Rich B” insisted on meeting with Rice and informed her at that time that “There would be a significant terrorist attack in the coming weeks or months,” with Black emphasizing that the attack would be “spectacular.” Black then added “This country needs to go on a war footing now and President Bush should give the CIA new covert action authorities to go after Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda organization.” After the meeting, Tenet’s contingent felt that they had finally gotten the full attention of the administration.

However, Tenet who met almost daily with President Bush to update him on threat reports was asked during a CBS “60 Minutes” television interview, with Scott Pelley, “Why he wasn’t telling the president, ‘Mr. President, this is terrifying; we need to respnd now’?” In response, Tenet replied because the “United States government doesn’t work that way, because the president is not the action officer; instead you present the action to the national security adviser and people who decide on policies they’re going to implement.” In effect, this meant that Tenet who had been CIA director since 1997 was hobbled by the traditional chain of command and was convinced that the CIA director’s “most important relationship with any administration official is generally with the national security adviser.” Nonetheless, Tenet successfully oversaw and executed the paramilitary assault to dislodge al-Qaeda from its Afghanistan sanctuary in the weeks and months after 9/11 using essentially the action he had proposed to Rice in the meeting of July 10, 2001.

Included in chapter 14, “They Want to Change History,” is Tenet’s compelling case that terrorism inside the United States is not over as he lays out al-Qaeda’s and other terrorist groups’ persistent efforts to obtain strategic weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear devices. Tenet then chillingly provides documentation supporting a claim that the Bush national security team was dysfunctional and that their appalling lack of communication was evident in their indecision over when to go to war actually stating, “One of the great mysteries to me is when Bush decided to go to war.”

Another example of this poor communication was seen on Aug. 26, 2002, 5-weeks before the National Intelligence Estimate revealed that “Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons,” when Vice President Cheney, tread on Tenet’s territory when he claimed in a speech before the Veterans of Foreign Wars that “Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction.”

The most interesting chapters are those describing Al Qaeda’s desire to build a nuclear weapon, the global response against Al Qaeda after 9/11 and the interlinking nuclear proliferation networks of Pakistan and Libya.

Tenet’s compelling narrative then turns to the war in Iraq providing dramatic insight into what occurred prior to the invasion including the president’s 2003 State of the Union address which claimed that Saddam Hussein had sought to purchase uranium from Africa and the CIA’s critical role in an administration predisposed to take the country to war. Tenet provides information about top administration officials’, saying that they were itching for a showdown with Saddam as shown by their defying of any respectable or honest piece of intelligence that proved contrary to their beliefs that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, while clinging onto flawed and downright unreliable sources, such as the infamous “Curveball.”

The book’s most important lesson is about our fractured intelligence services, which includes these points:

  1. The significance of maintaining a politically neutral central intelligence firm.
  2. Throwing billions more dollars at these agencies will not guarantee American security.
  3. The severity of unsupportable assertions and claims that wind up as fact by the policy makers whose ulterior motives are suspect deserve serious investigation. Finally,
  4. The grave results from said facts being used to support failed policy cannot be tolerated.

Nonetheless, Tenet’s book makes at least three major positive contributions: It…

  1. Relates the heroic story of how the CIA, just 16 days after 9/11, inserted its first teams into Afghanistan, and in less than 2.5 months with a limited number of Special Forces took back Afghanistan.
  2. Implicitly or explicitly corroborates about other key players - Bremmer, Feith, and Rice (who he portrays as incompetent and also as being a serial liar).
  3. Provides an entirely different perspective on his “Slam Dunk” response to the President that ultimately calls into question (again) the integrity of Bush’s assistants via their effort to blame Tenet for Bush invading Iraq.

Overall, Center of the Storm recounts George Tenet’s time as chief of the Central Intelligence Agency, revealing a look at the inner workings of the most important intelligence organization in the world during the most challenging times in recent history. Candid and gripping, Tenet illuminates the CIA’s painstaking attempts to prepare the country against new and deadly threats while offering explosive new information on the deliberations and strategies that culminated in the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Through it all, Tenet paints an unflinching self-portrait of a man caught between the warring forces of the Administration’s decision-making process, the reams of frightening intelligence pouring in from around the world, and his own conscience. Furthermore, this book provides is a fascinating and revealing glimpse into the secret world of intelligence, and the inner workings of the CIA.

[tags]War in Iraq, 9/11, George Tenet, nonfiction, historical, book, At the Center of the Storm: Central Intelligence Agency, CIA, Bush, Misguided intelligence, Saddam Hussein, al-Qaeda, terrorist attacks, Condoleezza Rice, Rumsfeld[/tags]

7 Comments

Tenet was very credible on The Daily Show. I think the good thing about the book is it puts to paper a record that generations from now people can look back and see what not to do.

After watching the interviews with him on The Daily Show, 60 Minutes, and Meet the Press, it is apparent that this is a man of some capability and the errors were further down the line.

As to why we went to war, I personally know an ‘insider’ who had been quietly saying almost from day 1 of the war that the whole war in Iraq was not just oil gluttony, but payback for the attempt on Bush 41’s life.

Dear Marc

I agree with your assessment. I think it is good to hear from people who were in power during this time that also agree with what we have all been thinking for years. Too bad Bush doesn’t realize that we see him for what he is - an evil warmonger. I will be so relieved when he is out of power but I fear that if the American people don’t learn about the candidates we could end up with someone just as bad or worse.

I plan to do as much studying as I can about the candidates and will keep the blog updated on what I find out.

Good to hear from you. Have a nice day. Jackie

I have no doubt that 9/11 was used as an excuse to go after Iraq. Reading statements from many of the civilian and military leaders involved at the time who have since retired only reinforces that belief.

Dear Mike

Thank you for visiting my site. I hope you will do so again. I plan to do more articles on Iraq as well as many on the candidates running for office and their stand on Iraq. Have a nice day. Jackie

I have just finished reading “America’s Secret War” by George Friedman.

This book is interesting in that it makes a case that al-Qaeda was, and is, primarily concerned with bringing down Middle Eastern governments that are (or were) supported (and heavily influence by) either America or Russia.

The attack of 9/11 was a demonstration by al-Qaeda that it could take on the US, and win. The attack was intended to make America look weak and impotent, thus undermining the support the US provides to governments in the region.

The subsequent attack on al-Quada in Afganistan and the war with Iraq is all about proving that America is a power to be reckoned with, and has nothing to do with WMDs - they just provided an excuse based on false intelligence supplied by Iran (a long-time enemy of Iraq).

It is going to be very interesting to see how the power shift in Congress plays out on the international scene. It could be a case of tails-you-win, heads-I-loose.

Dear Onoropu

I will read America’s Secret War to see what it says. I agree that war especially this war is a mind game and I think Bush and Usama should be made to fight it themselves instead of involving innocent men and women. Have a good day. Jackie

air charter travel…

In At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA, George Tenet…

What Do You Think?

 

Posted Recently

33 queries / 0.150 seconds.