Why Widescreen LCDs Suck
- 15
- Add a Comment
Ever since I purchased my PowerBook (TiBook) back in 2002, I’ve really come to dislike widescreen displays on computers. I don’t get it. What world are most of you working in? Sure, for movies they’re great but for work? I’m not an accountant so I have no need to go right but rather down. Web pages, e-mail, documents, ftp, and the list goes on where there are items that go top to bottom more than left to right. Thus, with these widescreen LCDs, I’m losing screen real estate. So why the big hoopla for them?
I understand how they just fit right on laptops, but for desktops, unless you’re getting a 30 inch LCD that can handle high resolution, it just doesn’t make sense to get one. I find on many Web pages I scroll much more on my MacBook Pro (MBP) than I do on my PC with its 21 inch 4:3 LCD screen. Sure, I don’t have as much room on the right, but who cares, the MBP isn’t giving me much more that I can use it for something anyway. No, I’m happy with the 4:3 setup and some times dread my MBP for its lack of depth. Maybe a higher resolution would help.
Now I wouldn’t mind having a widescreen LCD much like what co-Mac developer Andy Hertzfield and Burrell Smith came up with when they left Apple in 1986 to create Radius. The Pivot monitor was a work of art. I remember the first time I used it I thought the rest of the world would follow. To my disappointment, it didn’t. But today you can pick up something in the same, excuse the pun, frame of thought such as the Philips 170W4P LCD Display. It’s a bit dated, but reviews show it to be a pretty good display and since you can turn it on its axis and get more depth when needed, it hits my mark just fine. But, sadly these type of monitors are not too easy to find and thus I’m back to my beginning rant of why widescreen monitors suck. Lack of depth.
Tags: lcd, widescreen, standard screen, pivot, hertzfield, radius, apple

15 Comments
Mickeleh
November 28th, 2006
at 5:11am
You want a pivot screen? Get a Zune. (oops. wrong forum.)
Danny
November 28th, 2006
at 6:21am
As an artist a widescreen on a computer monitor is a blessing… I keep all of my palettes on the right side of the screen and it allows me to view the (top half) of the page comfortably. Yes, vertical would be nice but by the time you add room for all those much needed palettes the page would be to small to read.
Jen
November 28th, 2006
at 8:52am
I have to disagree with you on this one. Widescreen monitors are great. As a web/media designer and developer, I find the wider screen is great for working in Photoshop (as well as Final Cut) and tiling browser windows (or Terminal shells, for that matter) for at a glance viewing. But I suppose it depends on what you find yourself doing most often — if all you do is surf the web and read email, that extra screen space isn’t very useful.
Dima
November 28th, 2006
at 10:31am
Slow news day, eh?
David
November 28th, 2006
at 11:46am
Sven,
You missed the mark, as many critical journalists seem to do. Frequently, when you focus on the weaknesses of people or things, you don’t bring enough journalism to the positive light. And, in my humble opinion, there are many in today’s new breed of monitors.
1. Innovation now and in the future. You know…innovation breeds innovation?
2. Room for palettes and docks (or system trays) and other GUI paraphenalia.
3. Many applications, such as spreadsheets, have yearned for a wider screen. I’m sure there are others. Graphic artists I work with have no complaints.
4. Displaying multiple windows, side by side.
5. Having space on the left or right of your open window to see desktop icons.
6. Being able to see the desktop so one can “OPTION + CLICK” on it to HIDE the foremost application. (One of my favorite shortcuts).
So, all in all, I believe I have pointed out more positives than even the negatives you had to share. Look at the bright side…your Mac Book Pro has some really excellent performance. And the Intel Duo processors promise more of that to come.
And remember, Manufacturers are building for the masses. If “pivoting” monitors was such a great idea, why wouldn’t everyone make them?
David Stark
Anchorage Alaska
Tom Farley
November 28th, 2006
at 12:17pm
Coming from my experience, widescreen monitors are nice for CAD work. I am an apprentice architect and they’re great for showing more of the building and because I can get more of my button menus on the screen.
Niklas
December 17th, 2006
at 4:02am
Not true! I just bought a DELL 24″ and it works perfectly the way it should: rotated 90 degrees. Great for working on photos, but even better for programming and displaying long webpages like this one. So widescreen, I still have to get back on that, but loooong screen is definately great! :-)
Trimm
December 19th, 2006
at 12:41pm
Go into any Best Buy and look for the Samsung 204T. It rotates! I do wish Radius were still around like it was in the old days, though. Last I heard, Radius was making software for PC’s. For example, web pages reflowing to a second monitor.
Niklas
February 26th, 2007
at 1:33am
My Dell 2407, the Dell 2007 and 3007 all have this 90 degrees tilting. It’s GREAT for coding and great for portrait photos (although the colours on the Dell leave something to be desired)
Brendan
April 8th, 2007
at 11:07am
Widescreen is a product of the limited display area in a cinema, it is a absolutely tragic joke that we now have TV’s and monitors that shape.
DS
May 4th, 2007
at 10:28pm
I agree 100%. This revolution of widescreen is horrible.
No matter what you use the computer for, the intranet has to be a very large part of computer usage and all web pages and documents work better on 4:3 format. Nothing looks more silly than reading 4 lines from a webpage with all that empty spave to the right. Then, you have to scroll up and down to read the other lines. If you realy need to watch DVD’s so badly, go sit on your couch and watch TV or buy a cheap portable DVD player, but please bring back a normal computer screen to the world!!!
Tommy Jefferson
October 13th, 2007
at 2:29pm
I agree Sven. Widescreen LCD’s suck.
I use my computer for reading on the internet. For that purpose, taller is better.
Text runs down the page like it does in books and magazines for a reason. It’s the most comfortable way to read.
I watch movies on TV.
Pierre Andersson
November 9th, 2007
at 1:09am
In OS X it’s really easy to turn any monitor 90 degrees. There is an option for “rotation” in the display settings. The right Vesa mount should solve the issue of actually rotating the display,
Tom Hankster
December 2nd, 2007
at 7:37am
Wide screens on laptop computers suck. They are a pain in the ass. What in the heck is the matter with computer manufacturers, are they on dope?
There is zero benefit to a wide screen laptop, except that they are cheaper to manufacture and computer makers now charge a bundle extra for a sxga or a uxga screen. GET STUFFED COMPUTER MAKERS!!!
jake
March 16th, 2008
at 1:59am
I agree widescreen suck for laptops.,,causes too much scrolling down.
for watching movies…good, but how often or how many hrs a day you watch movies on notebook!!
a similar size diagonal ws is smaller than a 4:3, so its cheaper to manufacturers.