QWERTY Vs. Dvorak Vs. Maltron

Posted by on Aug 31, 2011 | 6 Comments

With or without knowing it, most of us (native users of the English language, anyway) use a keyboard layout known popularly as QWERTY; if your keyboard’s top row of letters begins with anything but Q, W, E, R, T, and Y, then you probably use an alternative keyboard layout like Dvorak or Maltron.

The QWERTY keyboard layout came about in the late 19th century as the most sensible response to the technology of the day for which it was designed: the typewriter. To eliminate the clashing of typebars that would sometimes result from typing frequently paired letters too soon in succession, such pairings were separated. As technology improved, though, and these mechanical difficulties were left by the wayside, QWERTY stuck around like an old, familiar friend — or enemy, as some would claim.

QWERTY Vs. Dvorak Vs. MaltronWhile many swear by the greater efficiency of movement of Dvorak and Maltron keyboard layouts because the most commonly used keys have been placed in more convenient places (without the technical problems such layouts would have caused in the earliest days of typewriters), QWERTY perseveres for the same reason that many obscure languages continue: people are comfortable with what they first learn. Trying to switch to a completely new experience is like rewiring the brain — it’s not usually a comfortable process, and the learning curve is steep. (This is probably also why Esperanto never really caught on, except as a novelty language and a vehicle for ’60s horror movie Incubus starring a pre-Kirk William Shatner.) Experienced typists, like experienced pianists, don’t usually need to look where their fingers are going to coax an expected result from their machine of choice.

So what do you think about keyboard layouts? Are you satisfied with the QWERTY setup and plan to use it until they pry your keyboard from your cold, decaffeinated fingers, or do you forge ahead with brain rewiring for the sake of efficiency and use an alternative like Dvorak or Maltron? In this video, LockerGnome’s Chris Pirillo and Brandon Wirtz talk a little bit about these three main keyboard layouts and agree that “Maltron” is a damned cool name for human beings and sentient robots, alike.

  • Anonymous

    Many ignorant people describe Esperanto as “failed” – other ignorant people say that if human beings were meant to fly, God would have given them wings.

    Esperanto is neither artificial nor a failure however. As the British Government now employs Esperanto translators it has ceased to be a hobby.

    During a short period of 124 years Esperanto is now in the top 100 languages, out of 6,800 worldwide. It is the 22nd most used language in Wikipedia, ahead of Danish and Arabic. It is a language choice of Google, Skype, Firefox, Ubuntu and Facebook.

    Native Esperanto speakers, (people who have used the language from birth), include World Chess Champion Susan Polger, Ulrich Brandenberg the new German Ambassador to and Nobel Laureate Daniel Bovet. Financier George Soros learnt Esperanto as a child.

    Esperanto is a living language – see http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8837438938991452670

    The new online course http://www.lernu.net has 125 000 hits per day and Esperanto Wikipedia enjoys 400 000 hits per day. That can’t be bad :)

  • http://twitter.com/AviatorStudios Brian Perkins

    Dvorak’s are HARD

    • http://zagorath.wordpress.com Zagorath

      Not too hard. It took me 2 months to get to equal speed to my previous QWERTY speed, and one month after that to reach my current average of 150% of my QWERTY speed.

      • Anonymous

        I tried to switch to DVORAK already once, but was too frustrated with my own typing speed after a month and switched back to qwerty. Now I decided to try the switch again. It is nice to hear that it has actually improved your WPM so much. :)

        • http://zagorath.wordpress.com Zagorath

          Good luck, let me know how it goes :)

  • http://zagorath.wordpress.com Zagorath

    When I made the switch, I printed out a picture of the Dvorak layout, and stuck it under my monitor. This meant that I had to look at that rather than the keys themselves, meaning I was able to learn to touch type much better. Had I had a physical Dvorak keyboard, or got stickers, I couldn’t have learnt nearly as well in the long-run, because I would have just re-learnt to hunt and peck.

    I switched to Dvorak around two years ago, and I’ve never looked back. I went from an average speed of 60 to an average speed of 90, my maximum went from 106wpm to over 130.

    That said, Dvorak has the significant disadvantage that it isn’t optimised for other languages as much as English. QWERTY has only minor varients to the French AZERTY, the German Kezboard, etc., making it relatively easy for one to switch between them.