Larger Head Size May Protect Against Alzheimer's Symptoms

Posted by on Jul 12, 2010 | 3 Comments

There should be an image here!New research shows that people with Alzheimer’s disease who have large heads have better memory and thinking skills than those with the disease who have smaller heads, even when they have the same amount of brain cell death due to the disease. The research is published in the July 13, 2010, issue of Neurology, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology.

“These results add weight to the theory of brain reserve, or the individual capacity to withstand changes in the brain,” said study author Robert Perneczky, MD, of the Technical University of Munich in Germany. “Our findings also underline the importance of optimal brain development early in life, since the brain reaches 93 percent of its final size at age six.”

Head size is one way to measure brain reserve and brain growth. Perneczky said that while brain growth is determined in part by genetics, it is also influenced by nutrition, infections and inflammations of the central nervous system, and brain injuries.

“Improving prenatal and early life conditions could significantly increase brain reserve, which could have an impact on the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease or the severity of symptoms of the disease,” he said.

For the study, 270 people with Alzheimer’s disease took tests of their memory and cognitive skills and had MRI scans of their brains to measure the amount of brain cell death. Head size was determined by the circumference measurement.

The study showed that larger head size was associated with a greater performance on memory and thinking tests, even when there was an equivalent degree of brain cell death. Specifically, for every one percent of brain cell death, an additional centimeter of head size was associated with a six percent greater performance on the memory tests.

Rachel Seroka @ American Academy of Neurology

[Photo above by raulua / CC BY-ND 2.0]

[awsbullet:alzheimer coping]

  • http://notagrouch.com Oscar Gonzalez

    I’m with you in that I like wired vs wireless. With the exception of my iMac, the keyboard and spiffy mouse that I have with it are awesome (just the regular apple ones) and even when I was near 3 or or more imacs in the vicinity with the same setup, it never gave me any problems. As for the batteries, I’m pretty happy with the rechargeable setup from Apple as well.

  • http://twitter.com/morecar89 Manuel Moreno

    If you use a shitty quality trackpad, then ok, it’s horrible after 30 seconds. With a good trackpad like Apple’s trackpads it’s actually the most confortable choice. And wired mice are not an option, even for gamers, wireless mice have improved sooo much. I don’t remember the frustration of pulling from the mouse cord and not being able to get more length. Also, most of the decent mice I have seen lately come with a charger and 2 batteries.

    About keyboards, the same, if you use a shitty quality product then OK. My wireless keyboards batteries can last for more than 2 years, and as a software developer i write a LOT. I never ever had that problem about the key getting stuck. The only con I find is the fact that they lack a USB hub. But I’d totally recommend buying a wireless KB to a friend, the cable free environment is just worth it.

  • http://twitter.com/zbob750 Zach Brown

    I can’t say I’ve ever had a problem with a wireless keyboard aside from batteries of course.
    The reason I use a wireless mouse/keyboard combo is because I use some of the newer logitech keyboard and mice with the tiny little unifying reciever. When my keyboard gets low on juice it just stops. I can honestly say I’ve never had a laggy key or anything.
    Although I have daisy-chained several keyboards before I mostly find that the same quality can be reached using a higher end wireless keyboard