Is Chocolate Milk A 'Natural' For Post-Exercise Recovery?

Posted by on Jun 3, 2010 | 15 Comments

There should be an image here!One of the best post-exercise recovery drinks could already be in your refrigerator, according to new research presented at the American College of Sports Medicine conference this week. In a series of four studies, researchers found that chocolate milk offered a recovery advantage to help repair and rebuild muscles, compared to specially designed carbohydrate sports drinks.

Experts agree that the two-hour window after exercise is an important, yet often neglected, part of a fitness routine. After strenuous exercise, this post-workout recovery period is critical for active people at all fitness levels — to help make the most of a workout and stay in top shape for the next workout.

The new research suggests that drinking fat free chocolate milk after exercise can help the body retain, replenish and rebuild muscle to help your body recover. Drinking lowfat chocolate milk after a strenuous workout could even help prep muscles to perform better in a subsequent bout of exercise. Specifically, the researchers found a chocolate milk advantage for:

  • Building Muscle — Post-exercise muscle biopsies in eight moderately trained male runners showed that after drinking 16 ounces of fat free chocolate milk, the runners had enhanced skeletal muscle protein synthesis — a sign that muscles were better able to repair and rebuild — compared to when they drank a carbohydrate only sports beverage with the same amount of calories. The researchers suggest that “athletes can consider fat-free chocolate milk as an economic nutritional alternative to other sports nutrition beverages to support post-endurance exercise skeletal muscle repair.”
  • Replenishing Muscle “Fuel” — Replacing muscle fuel (glycogen) after exercise is essential to an athlete’s future performance and muscle recovery. Researchers found that drinking 16 ounces of fat free chocolate milk with its mix of carbohydrates and protein (compared to a carbohydrate-only sports drink with the same amount of calories) led to greater concentration of glycogen in muscles at 30 and 60 minutes post exercise.
  • Maintaining Lean Muscle — Athletes risk muscle breakdown following exercise when the body’s demands are at their peak. Researchers found that drinking fat free chocolate milk after exercise helped decrease markers of muscle breakdown compared to drinking a carbohydrate sports drink.
  • Subsequent Exercise Performance — Ten trained men and women cyclists rode for an hour and a half, followed by 10 minutes of intervals. They rested for four hours and were provided with one of three drinks immediately and two hours into recovery: lowfat chocolate milk, a carbohydrate drink with the same amount of calories or a control drink. When the cyclists then performed a subsequent 40 kilometer ride, their trial time was significantly shorter after drinking the chocolate milk compared to the carbohydrate drink and the control drink.

Why Chocolate Milk?

Chocolate milk’s combination of carbohydrates and high-quality protein first made researchers take notice of a potential exercise benefit. The combination of carbs and protein already in chocolate milk matched the ratio found to be most beneficial for recovery. In fact, studies suggest that chocolate milk has the right mix of carbs and protein to help refuel exhausted muscles, and the protein in milk helps build lean muscle. This new research adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting milk can be just as effective as some commercial sports drinks in helping athletes refuel and recover.

Milk also provides fluids for rehydration and electrolytes, including potassium, calcium and magnesium lost in sweat, that both recreational exercisers and elite athletes need to replace after strenuous activity. Plus, chocolate milk is naturally nutrient-rich with the advantage of additional nutrients not found in most traditional sports drinks. Penny-for-penny, no other post-exercise drink contains the full range of vitamins and minerals found in chocolate milk.

Gloria Delgadillo @ Weber Shandwick Worldwide

[Photo above by Roadsidepictures / CC BY-ND 2.0]

[awsbullet:organic chocolate Milk]

  • Tony

    I first heard about this almost five years ago on Paul Harvey’s “News and Comment”, so it’s not new to me.

  • Mark

    YOU GOTTA BE KIDDIN’!…CHOCOLATE MILK IS LOADED
    WITH HFCS (HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP),,,NOT THE
    KIND OF STUFF YOU WANT TO INGEST. SWEET POISON!

  • http://twitter.com/matbeeDOTcom Mathieu Gosbee

    Nonsense. Having an opportunity to have -any- OS, I wouldn’t choose Android. Choosing WP7 was my best idea. Fantastic OS with a much better experience than any iphone or android. Doesn’t compare to WebOS — however it is among the top.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Floyd/1358554781 Stephen Floyd

    A lot of people said the same of xbox when it was first released, now look at it. And with Microsoft now  unifying thier products into one experience, I think it’s safe to say WP7 will take off in a big way. It just needs to break that first barrier. No one knows the name Windows Phone yet. Once word starts to spread, it’ll take off like a wild fire.

  • http://twitter.com/Mariox45 Beecher

    Yes, I think wp7 is doomed
    Because first off you can’t write c/c++ apps, or even objective c and you have to use there propierity language making it hard to port programs to it, second off the requirments are too high, and then last of all it’s locked down (and I know ios is locked down a lot too but it has a good amount of apps that can save it from being unpopular), and plus microsoft is known for not locking down there software

  • http://twitter.com/Kittyburgers Kitty Burgers

    This is a terrible post. What does it mean?  Why doesn’t the Windows Phone 7 “compare favourably to Apple and Google”?  You don’t explain. Highly opinionated and lacking in anything one would need to form some sort of comparison between the three different phone operating systems.

    “Consumers cannot be fooled into spending their money on an inferior product.” … seriously?

  • Mike Gill

    Doesn’t one of Microsofts old management directors run Nokia (the largest cellphone maker on the planet) now? didn’t he get rid of Nokia’s software in favor of running Win7 software? aren’t there rumblings about Nokia being bought out by Microsoft? If the last part was to happen with would Microsoft be positioned?

  • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

    What do I think?

    Hmmm .. let’s see, how about more facts and less opinion? Seriously Chris, is this the people you’re hiring? Wow.

    • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

      If you disagree with his opinion, feel free to share your own. Or… talk smack.

      • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

        It’s not that I disagree with his opinion, I mean, everyone is entitled to their opinion after all. It’s the fact that there’s nothing to back up what he said. By reading the title, I was expecting some stats or breaking news or whatnot, specially when considering where this article comes from.

        • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

          What stats were you looking for?

          • http://josedmorales.net Josè Daniel

            I was not looking for stats, I said I was expecting some information like statistics that would help me understand why “Microsoft Won’t Be Able to Buy Success for its Windows Phone 7″. Sure sales are beyond epic fail, Ballmer knows that and I know that, but (E.G.), weren’t Xbox initial sales that bad as well? (Not trying to change the subject but to make a point)

  • Robert Daggett

    At launch, Java was the only officially supported programming language for building distributable third-party Android software.Android Native Development Kit (Android NDK) which will allow developers to build Android software components with C and C++.In addition to delivering support for native code, Google is also extending Android to support popular dynamic scripting languages. Earlier this month, Google launched the Android Scripting Environment (ASE) which allows third-party developers to build simple Android applications with perl, JRuby, Python, LUA and BeanShell. For having idea and usage ofASE, refer this Example link.Scala is also supported. For having examples of Scala, refer these Example link-1 , Example link-2 , Example link-3 .Just now i have referred one Article Here in which i found some useful information as follows:
    programming language is Java but bridges from other languages exist (C# .net – Mono, etc).can run script languages like LUA, Perl, Python, BeanShell, etc. I have read 2nd article at Google Releases ‘Simple’ Android Programming Language . For example of this, refer this .Just now (2 Aug 2010) i have read an article which describes regarding “Frink Programming language and Calculating Tool for Android”, refer this links Link-1 , Link-2On 4-Aug-2010, i have found Regarding RenderScript. Basically, It is said to be a C-like language for high performance graphics programming, which helps you easily write efficient Visual effects and animations in your Android Applications. Its not released yet as it isn’t finished.

  • http://developingux.com Caleb Jenkins

    Hi Robert – I can totally own that my comment might have come across with the wrong tone, and for that I do apologize.

    I do not believe my point was weather or not Android could do other languages (I believe I said that neither iOS or Android prefer c++) I was trying to make the point that with open source and cross platform options like Mono, .NET is probably the most multi-platform option for doing native phone development.

    A far cry from the “propriety language” in Beecher’s comment. And yes.. there is even a C# compiler that runs on the android phone. https://market.android.com/details?id=com.gregshackles.csharptogo

    Cheers – and thanks for keeping me honest. :-)

  • Anonymous

    I did like the fact that the  windows phone adverts revolved around the theme of not wanting to use your phone and its true most people don’t want to use windows phone. On a related point I dont think many people will use bing even just for search and there certainly not using it for maps, Have you seen the map? its soo ugly! Good article; but i think you could have stressed the main differences between them a lot more.