Can Bacteria Make You Smarter?

Posted by on May 26, 2010 | 7 Comments

There should be an image here!Exposure to specific bacteria in the environment, already believed to have antidepressant qualities, could increase learning behavior according to research presented today at the 110th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology in San Diego.

“Mycobacterium vaccae is a natural soil bacterium which people likely ingest or breath in when they spend time in nature,” says Dorothy Matthews of The Sage Colleges in Troy, New York, who conducted the research with her colleague Susan Jenks.

Previous research studies on M. vaccae showed that heat-killed bacteria injected into mice stimulated growth of some neurons in the brain that resulted in increased levels of serotonin and decreased anxiety.

“Since serotonin plays a role in learning we wondered if live M. vaccae could improve learning in mice,” says Matthews.

Matthews and Jenks fed live bacteria to mice and assessed their ability to navigate a maze compared to control mice that were not fed the bacteria.

“We found that mice that were fed live M. vaccae navigated the maze twice as fast and with less demonstrated anxiety behaviors as control mice,” says Matthews.

In a second experiment the bacteria were removed from the diet of the experimental mice and they were retested. While the mice ran the maze slower than they did when they were ingesting the bacteria, on average they were still faster than the controls.

A final test was given to the mice after three weeks’ rest. While the experimental mice continued to navigate the maze faster than the controls, the results were no longer statistically significant, suggesting the effect is temporary.

“This research suggests that M. vaccae may play a role in anxiety and learning in mammals,” says Matthews. “It is interesting to speculate that creating learning environments in schools that include time in the outdoors where M. vaccae is present may decrease anxiety and improve the ability to learn new tasks.”

Garth Hogan @ American Society for Microbiology

[Photo above by Umberto Salvagnin / CC BY-ND 2.0]

[awsbullet:Good Germs Bad Germs]

  • Pingback: Is Comcast Extreme? ~ Chris Pirillo

  • http://www.justenrobertson.com Justen

    Interesting. Nature rewards us for living in it, in a sense. : )

  • http://livingleft.wordpress.com Diane McCarthy

    Let’s bake up some mudpies and tell mom she should have let us play in the dirt after all.

  • Pingback: Can Bacteria Make you Smarter–Or I need to get out in the garden more! « Living on the Left Means I'm in the Right Side of My Mind

  • Jacob Bubble1

    I think it is about price rather than performance. There are many comparable i.Pad products that sell terribly but I think if they were significantly cheaper, they would sell better (Nook color). I think people are willing to sacrifice some quality if they get it cheap.

  • Anonymous

    For some people it’s about the brand, but how did Apple’s brand get so hot? Because they’ve been making high quality products for years and the brand has a good reputation. You can’t just slap a pretty logo on something and get it to sell.

    The iPhone took off selling well because other cell phones were awful. Just look at consumer surveys from the several years before it came out. Everyone hated their cell phone. Now that iPhone has shown that quality products will grab market share despite a high price, others are trying to copy that win. So far, only Android is succeeding at that, though the jury is still out on where that will settle. The new Windows Phone OS may have a chance, too, if it’s not too late. Nokia and Ericsson are on life-support.

    The HP Touchpad and most of the other tablets are being priced wrongly. The consumers don’t care how much it took to make it, they care about how much they can do with it compared to the other things. If it doesn’t do as much as an iPad, then it has to have a lower price. Period. If that means selling at a loss for a year or two just to get some market penetration, then that’s a risk to take. HP was too afraid to take that risk on the chance that they’d get volume discounts from parts suppliers later. Whether that was the right decision may never be known.

  • http://twitter.com/HarryMonmouth Harry Monmouth

    HPs mistake wasn’t to pull the touchpad.  It was to release the touchpad in the first place.  WebOS has such huge potential but trying to introduce a device onto a market against a quality product like the iPad the only way they could do it would be either to create something of comparable quality, which they failed to do, or at a reasonable price, which they failed to do.