Scientists Find New, Inexpensive Way To Predict Alzheimer's Disease

There should be an image here!Your brain’s capacity for information is a reliable predictor of Alzheimer’s disease and can be cheaply and easily tested, according to scientists.

“We have developed a low-cost behavioral assessment that can clue someone in to Alzheimer’s disease at its earliest stage,” said Michael Wenger, associate professor of psychology, Penn State. “By examining (information) processing capacity, we can detect changes in the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).”

MCI is a condition that affects language, memory, and related mental functions. It is distinct from the ordinary mental degradation associated with aging and is a likely precursor to the more serious Alzheimer’s disease. Both MCI and Alzheimer’s are linked to a steady decline in the volume of the hippocampus, the area of the brain responsible for long term memory and spatial reasoning.

MRIs — magnetic resonance imaging — are the most reliable and direct way to detect hippocampal atrophy and diagnose MCI. But for many, the procedure is unavailable or too expensive.

“MRIs can cost hundreds of dollars an hour,” Wenger said. “We created a much cheaper alternative, based on a memory test, that correlates with hippocampal degradation.” Wenger and his collaborators at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn., detail their findings in a recent issue of the Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

From a computer model of an atrophying hippocampus, the researchers determined how to estimate capacity with a statistical measure of how quickly tasks are completed. Applying this analysis to a memory test for people with MCI, the researchers were able to gauge their hippocampal capacity and compare it to the progression of their ailment.

“My collaborators at the Mayo Clinic backed up this study with MRIs for the MCI group,” Wenger said. “These capacity measures we developed showed a reliable relationship to the hippocampal volume measurements, so we know we are on the right track.”

The scientists began by modeling the hippocampus as a complex electrical circuit. Equations governing electric current and voltage mimicked the electrical firing of neurons within the circuit. The researchers switched off neurons in the simulation to model atrophy of the hippocampus.

With fewer cells available to process electrical signals, the model hippocampus slowed down, but its capacity for processing information decreased at an even faster rate. Capacity was the most sensitive measure of how the hippocampus was deteriorating, more than the average processing speed.

“We then applied this to the gold standard of the field — the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT),” Wenger said. “This is a test that can discriminate between normal age-related memory changes and changes caused by impairment.”

The researchers gave this test to five groups of participants: college students, healthy middle-aged adults, healthy elderly individuals, people with diagnosed cases of MCI, and a control group of age-matched individuals without MCI. The first three groups each had 100 members and the last two each had 50.

During the FCSRT, the researchers showed the participants descriptive words, such as “part of the body” and “artery” and asked the participants to choose the picture that fit these cues from a set of 24 images, in this case, a picture of a heart. The psychologists then asked the subjects to recall as many items as they could. For objects they failed to remember, the psychologists provided the category cues, providing more information and testing the limits of the subjects’ capacity.

The researchers analyzed the response times for the tasks and the number of items that were recalled, with and without additional cues. The MCI group showed the greatest sensitivity to added cues – the additional input either substantially helped or inhibited their performance. But like the computer model, estimates of capacity highlighted the greatest cognitive difference between the MCI group and the others.

This study’s approach to defining processing capacity is unusual. The scientists combined disparate principles of engineering and statistics, mathematically translating processing capacity into what is called the “hazard function.”

The hazard function is well known in engineering, but relatively new for fields like psychology. It gives the probability that a task that is not yet completed will be completed in the next interval of time.

By measuring how long it takes a participant to recall the objects during the FCSRT, the psychologists fit a model based on the hazard function to each participant and obtain a measure of his or her capacity for the memorization task.

The difference in hazard function measures between the MCI group and all other groups was statistically much more pronounced than the differences between all groups in the number of items they recalled. These hazard function differences also outweighed the contrasts between all groups in their response times. The hazard function model proved to be the most sensitive diagnostic for cognitive distinctions in the groups, making it a reliable indicator of capacity and a better signal of the underlying hippocampal atrophy than processing speed alone.

The researchers’ results are valid for every person, not just for the whole group. Since the modified FCSRT relies on personal reaction times, hazard analysis and performance, it can track the progression of MCI for anyone, anywhere there is access to a computer.

“These results are still preliminary, but very encouraging,” Wenger said. “We plan to study what this approach can tell us about mental impairments related to other conditions, like iron deficiencies, in the future.”

A’ndrea Elyse Messer @ Penn State

[Photo above by Jen / CC BY-ND 2.0]

[awsbullet:Alzheimer disease prevent]

Article Written by

  • Will Treece

    I’d agree, I think that tablets do have their uses and place in the market but its not enough of a draw to move me away from having a notebook or desktop.

  • Punkofbrutality1984

    i agree… a tablet wins if you are trying to read ebooks and the like…. otherwise if you want to play games you are better off on a laptop (i dont call them notebooks so they arent confused with netbooks, which lack the specs to play over 75% of games on the market) or a desktop computer… but its also good to use a tablet if you want to surf the web while standing (though i haven’t had a desire or need to do that)

  • snookz

    i love these tablets but they will never beat a good custom home build pc

  • Anonymous

    Although I cannot prove this, I have heard tales about people who bought computing devices for purposes that did not involve writing business reports. I know that’s hard to believe, but I am assured that it happens.

    Just the other day, I decided that it would be nice to sit out on the porch and read blogs. So like everyone else, I went out and bought a desk, an office chair, and a right proper desktop computer with Word and Excel, and installed them outside, on the porch.

    Until people can take tablets out onto the porch to read blogs, they will not represent a threat to real PCs.

  • SpyderBite

    For the casual user, the Tablet is a completely viable mobile solution. When I say “casual”, I am referring to those whose computer time is spent in email, social media, watching videos and listening to music.

    For everybody else, the Tablets currently available are really just toys or a convenient alternative to using our blackberries, droids, windows mobiles & iPhones. Lets face it. They’re really just bigger versions of our phones without.. well.. the phone. Most even have the same OS as our phones.

    In the future.. say 5 to 10 years from now, Tablets may become more of a mainstream device and begin phasing out the notebook computers much like the latter has done to the desktops in recent years. But, for now, developers should be concentrating on making the tablets more useful in the medical, legal and corporate environments. It is pretty pathetic that majority of hospitals still hang clipboards on the end of a hospital bed while the doctor on duty is playing Angry Birds on his iPad in his office.

    Anyways.. it is not time yet to think of Tablets as a Notebook replacement solution. For the time being, think of Tablet PC’s as a Netbook and Macbook Air replacement solution. :)

  • Hannah Jensen

    Tablets and PCs will coexist for some time but the shift to cloud computing and specialized services will reduce the need to use a “PC” for specific tasks. An example is one part of my job where I need to format and send commissions earning statements to many sales reps…while I need my PC for all of the excel calculations, I now can format and distribute through a “cloud app” where I don’t need any power, just a fast internet connection (app still in beta but it works ). I expect many more highly specialized, niche and simple apps to emerge which will reduce my need for my laptop. Don’t know when I could ever give it up, though.