Natural Gas Supplies Could Be Augmented With Methane Hydrate

Posted by on Feb 3, 2010 | 7 Comments

There should be an image here!The Naturally occurring methane hydrate may represent an enormous source of methane, the main component of natural gas, and could ultimately augment conventional natural gas supplies, says a new congressionally mandated report from the National Research Council. Although a number of challenges require attention before commercial production can be realized, no technical challenges have been identified as insurmountable. Moreover, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Methane Hydrate Research and Development Program has made considerable progress in the past five years toward understanding and developing methane hydrate as a possible energy resource.

“DOE’s program and programs in the national and international research community provide increasing confidence from a technical standpoint that some commercial production of methane from methane hydrate could be achieved in the United States before 2025,” said Charles Paull, chair of the committee that wrote the report, and senior scientist, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in California. “With global energy demand projected to increase, unconventional resources such as methane hydrate become important to consider as part of the future U.S. energy portfolio and could help provide more energy security for the United States.”

Methane hydrate, a solid composed of methane and water, occurs in abundance on the world’s continental margins and in permafrost regions, such as in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska’s North Slope. Although the total global volume of methane in methane hydrate is still debated, estimates yield figures that are significant compared with the global supplies of conventional natural gas. The existence of such a large and untapped energy resource has provided a strong global incentive to determine how methane might be produced from methane hydrate safely, economically, and in an environmentally sensible way.

Some of the remaining challenges to production identified by the committee include developing the technology necessary to produce methane from methane hydrate and understanding methane hydrate’s potential to behave as a geohazard. For example, industry practice is to avoid methane-hydrate bearing areas during drilling for conventional oil and gas resources for safety reasons. However, avoidance will not be possible if methane hydrate is the production target. In addition, the committee recommended research and development areas for DOE’s program, such as designing production tests, appraising and mitigating environmental issues related to production, and determining with greater accuracy the methane hydrate resources on the Alaska North Slope and in marine reservoirs.

Jennifer Walsh @ National Academy of Sciences

[Photo above by der_bobbel / CC BY-ND 2.0]

[awsbullet:natural gas energy]

  • http://twitter.com/Russehh Russell

    I think quality is also affected greatly by light.. The more light, the better the photo. Especially when it comes to iPhones and other devices.

    • http://kevinrubin.blogspot.com Kevin Rubin

      A fancier camera, like an SLR will give you more options for low light photography so you can get good photos at night… But that’s something most camera phones I’ve seen won’t do, so they up the ISO and give grainy pictures, or too long an exposure so they’re shaky…

  • Anthony Perlas

    Phone cameras a good for if you nothing else to take pictures with. The biggest factor is the lens. A bigger lens would generally take better pictures. If look at lens of phone camera, there are none. All you see is an aperture the size of a hole punctured by safety pin.

    To me, the most appealing features for a point and shoot would be water resistance. Who don’t want to take pictures when swimming. There’s no reason not to get one that is not water resistant if you get one or another one. Everything other point and shoot would be just seemingly disposable.

    An even better quality camera are DSLR. Entry level models are somewhat affordable. This takes taking picture to a whole new level. The pictures are much clearer and more customizable.

  • Rossladehoff

    dude my blackberry curve sucks when it comes to resolution. So my digi is always with me but my contract is up the end of this month and i have been glancing at the iphone and the DROID x. picture resolution is amazing. The new phone will most likely replace the complexity of transferring pics from my camera to my phone. Sorry bro

  • http://www.youonpictures.com Anonymous

    Id still use a digital camera… I have a pretty good digital camera, I don’t care if it doesn’t have perfect quality. Digital cameras are so much nicer…

  • http://kevinrubin.blogspot.com Kevin Rubin

    While I occasionally get some good photos with my iPhone 4, pretty much all in daylight, it’s no substitute for my regular digital camera. I take my digital SLR everywhere, and the key thing I like about the SLR is having options for interchangeable lenses and a lot more control over settings, which the camera phone can’t touch.

    I agree with starting with a point & shoot, though. At my last company, which was big enough to have a photo club, a lot of members never took part in shoots because they felt their cameras weren’t fancy enough to compete with those of us using SLRs. I kept telling them, “don’t worry about it, you can still take good photos, especially in daylight.”

    One of things I liked to stress to people shy about their gear was that the absolute number one part of taking good photos is pointing the camera in the right direction, which is easily possible with the point & shoot (number two being taking the lens cap off…)

    I’m thinking of getting a point & shoot myself now. I’ve been in NYC for about six months, with my digital SLR and iPhone. People all over hand me their cameras to take their pictures in front of landmarks and tall buildings and things, and that’s kind of fun. But I don’t have the nerve to hand my expensive camera and lenses to someone else to take my photo, so there’s almost no photographic evidence that I’ve been in New York…

  • http://pointandshootcamerasinfo.com/ Claire

    “Yes, we most certainly do need to stick with using real cameras for quality photos and leave the smart phones/tablets for those looking to goof around.”
    => I totally agree with you