Managed Wolf Populations Could Restore Ecosystems

Posted by on Feb 1, 2010 | 6 Comments

There should be an image here!Researchers writing in the February issue of BioScience propose reintroducing small, managed populations of wolves into national parks and other areas in order to restore damaged ecosystems. The populations would not be self-sustaining, and may consist of a single pack. But the BioScience authors suggest that even managed populations could bring ecological, educational, recreational, scientific, and economic benefits.

The authors, Daniel S. Licht, of the National Park Service, and four coauthors, note that research in recent years has shown the importance of wolves to ecosystems in which they naturally occur. For example, the presence of wolves usually leads to fewer ungulates, which in turn generally means more plant biomass and biodiversity. Wolves can also increase tourism.

Licht and his coauthors believe that wolves introduced for the purpose of ecosystem stewardship, rather than for the creation of self-sustaining wolf populations, could enhance public understanding and appreciation of the animals. Advances in real-time animal tracking made possible through global positioning system technology, as well as the use of contraception and surgery, could help in controlling the growth of introduced populations. This approach might mitigate concerns about depredation of livestock and game, attacks on pets, and human safety, Licht and colleagues maintain. Fences could also play a role.

Wolves were introduced to Coronation Island, Alaska, for ecosystem restoration in 1960, and they successfully controlled deer there before the wolf population grew and subsequently crashed. Licht and his coauthors suggest that with more intensive management this unfavorable outcome could have been avoided, and that desirable results could be expected at many sites in North America and elsewhere, provided there are sufficient prey.

Timothy M. Beardsley @ American Institute of Biological Sciences

[Photo above by Tambako / CC BY-ND 2.0]

[awsbullet:jack london novel]

  • Connor Bryant

    I could help manage wolf populations. [clicks shotgun]

  • http://profiles.google.com/techbaseuk tech-base UK

    i’m not too sure in this case. what would the subscription come with? if it was just the right to use the system then i think it is a bit insane.

    • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

      Right. That remains to be seen. I’d argue that we’re providing more value to Google by giving them our eyeballs…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ash-Caldwell/100000514988986 Ash Caldwell

    I really dislike subscriptions.

  • http://chris.pirillo.com/ Chris Pirillo

    I don’t know if I’d care to run anything but ChromeOS on these things. It’s sub-netbook, and I’d say that the costs just don’t “work” unless Internet access is free with the subscription.

  • http://twitter.com/GavinRoskamp Gavin Roskamp

    In response to the SD/USB ports, you can easily make them (mostly) functional. Just start it up, click in the address bar, type “about:flags” (without quotes), and click enable under “Advanced File System.” I have switched mine over to the developmental channel (Wrench>About Chrome OS>More Info>Channel), so I’m sure that I have a more recent version of this capability, but it *should* still work if you’re still on the beta channel.

    Anyway, after enabling it and rebooting, just pop in a USB drive or an SD card and it will come up with a window saying that it is scanning your device. After it’s done, just hit Ctrl+O to launch the content browser, then just click on your drive’s name. It’s not very advanced at all, but it works. For uploading things, just go to the website, click the upload button, and it should bring up a similar window. Just navigate to your drive’s name and you’ll have access to all your files.

    As for the dual-booting, do remember that this thing has a tiny HD, so dual-booting is kinda illogical. I too have thought of trying to put Windows or another Linux distro on it, but have stopped myself because of lack of time and because it just feels wrong, since you did agree to keep Chrome OS on it when you applied.