E-Mail:

Many Common Medical Beliefs Are Untrue

  • No Related Post

Should we drink at least eight glasses of water a day? Does shaving hair cause it to grow back faster or coarser? Does reading in dim light ruin your eyesight?

These are just some of the common medical myths that are unproven or untrue, according to a study in this week’s Christmas issue of the British Medical Journal.

Researchers in the United States selected seven medical beliefs, espoused by both physicians and members of the general public, for critical review. They then searched for evidence to support or refute each of these claims.

The quality of evidence was taken into account and instances in which no evidence supported the claim were noted.

The results show that all of these medical beliefs range from unproven to untrue. For example, they found no evidence supporting the need to drink eight glasses of water a day. In fact, studies suggest that adequate fluid intake is often met by the consumption of juice, milk, and even caffeinated beverages. Clinical evidence also points to the dangers of drinking excessive amounts of water.

The belief that we only use ten percent of our brains is refuted by studies of patients with brain damage, which suggest that damage to almost any area of the brain has specific and lasting effects on mental, vegetative, and behavioural capabilities, say the authors. Brain imaging studies also show that no area of the brain is completely silent or inactive.

The belief that hair and fingernails continue to grow after death may be an optical illusion caused by retraction of the skin after death, they add. The actual growth of hair and nails requires a complex interplay of hormonal regulation not present after death.

Again, illusion may be to blame for the belief that shaving hair causes it to grow back faster, darker, and coarser, they say. The stubble resulting from shaving grows out without the finer taper seen at the ends of unshaven hair, giving the impression of thickness and coarseness.

Finally, expert opinion is that reading in dim light does not damage your eyes, and there is little evidence to support beliefs such as banning mobile phones from hospitals on the basis of electromagnetic interference.

Despite their popularity, all of these medical beliefs range from unproven to untrue, say the authors. They suggest that physicians should constantly evaluate the validity of their knowledge.

3 Comments

I’d like to add a bit of clarity to the cell phone/medical equipment issue.
First, why I feel qualified - I’m a Clinical Engineer; I deal with medical equipment in hospitals. Also, I started my career in military radio electronics, often dealing with interference. Finally, I’m a ham operator; understanding interference is needed for the licenses and good operation.

True, a complete ban is unnecessary. However, caution is advised in using cell phones everywhere in the hospital. A new cell phone has a strong enough signal to interfere with medical equipment from 6 feet away, the risk increases exponentially the closer you get - get within 3 feet and the risk is four times greater. I’ve researched all the material published; at know point does any of the articles that ared based on actual test suggest either a complete ban or unrestricted use.

Bottom line, avoid having your cell phone turned on within three feet of any critical medical equipment (ORs, ICUs are example areas). In the outpatient or waiting areas, or a few feet away from your loved one in the bed is OK.

I hope I don’t get brain damage; I would hate to have my vegetative capabilities diminished.

What about being cold will will “give” you a cold? Since it’s an infection, you get infected by being near someone who already has it, not being cold.

Note that being cold can lower your resistance to being infected, but it’s still a germ…

What Do You Think?

 
51 queries / 0.316 seconds.