No Need For Children With Lazy Eye To Wear Patches All Day
- 4
- Add a Comment
- No Related Post
Children with amblyopia (commonly known as lazy eye) need only wear an eye patch for three to four hours a day for 12 weeks to improve vision, say researchers in a study published on bmj.com today.
Patching for all waking hours for up to several years, which is often recommended, is almost certainly excessive, they argue.
Amblyopia results from a disturbance to the vision pathways between the eyes and the brain, which is often associated with blurred vision or crossed eyes (strabismus).
Studies have shown that occlusion therapy (patching) can improve vision, but results suggest that “maximal” doses (12 hours a day) are no more beneficial than “substantial” doses (six hours a day). Despite this, many doctors still prescribe large doses, above six hours a day.
So researchers at City University in London and McGill University in Montreal funded by Fight for Sight, London, set out to determine the amount of occlusion treatment required in children with amblyopia to achieve the best outcome.
The study involved 97 children aged three to eight years with a confirmed diagnosis of amblyopia. All children had a full ophthalmic assessment and were instructed to wear glasses all the time for 18 weeks. On completion of this phase, 80 children who still met the study’s definition of amblyopia were then told to wear a patch for either six or 12 hours a day.
Two electrodes were attached to the under surface of each patch to monitor the amount of occlusion each child actually received. Visual function was recorded every two weeks.
There was no significant difference in visual acuity between the two groups. However, the mean dose rates (hours a day with a patch) actually achieved were also not significantly different (4.2 in the six hour group and 6.2 in the 12 hour group).
Visual improvement was similar for those children who received three to six hours a day or six to 12 hours a day, but significantly worse for children who received less than three hours a day.
Children under four years of age required significantly less occlusion (under three hours a day) than older children to correct their vision.
This analysis suggests that achieving an initial dose rate of three to four hours a day should be a clinical priority, say the authors. The response depends on age, however, so for children under four years this could be reduced. Patching beyond 12 weeks did not confer additional benefit.
Eye patching can cause considerable distress for both the child and family, they add, so doctors should try to minimise the amounts necessary for the best expected outcome.
[tags]eye patch, eyepatch, eye care, lazy eye[/tags]

4 Comments
Don Moore
September 15th, 2007
at 8:36am
I started to wear glasses in 2nd grade and was diagnosed with amblyopia. That was 40 years ago. The doctor gave me a patch to clip on over the left side of my eyeglasses, which looked ridiculous and I fully expected to be picked on (I already was to some extent), so I simply didn’t wear it. Either at school or at home. His instructions were to do it as much as possible - no specific number of hours per day.
Now, at 48, I have a wandering eye, which is noticeable by others, and extremely poor depth perception. I urge all parents to be patient with their kids if they hshould wear a patch, but don’t give in. Case in point: I cannot play baseball(or softball) because of my poor depth perception. My eyes cannot make the switch in distance quickly enough to either hit the ball or to be able to catch it as it comes toward me. And I can’t have a catch with my son because I can’t tell how far away he is, so my throws always fall short and he gets discouraged and wants to stop. And this didn’t develop right away - it was gradual. So if you don’t experience these probles right away that is no guarantee it won’t be a problem later on. I love baseball so it’s very hard on me to not be able to play any more. I tried playing first base on a softball team, and could see the throws to me until they were a couple feet away, and then my eyes couldn’t refocus fast enough so the ball ‘disappeared’.
All this is to say, this can be a serious problem - maybe not medically so much as psychologically, and it needs to be addressed while young. So persevere and wear the patch - avoid the regrets later on, when it’s too late to correct the problem.
Peter Teiman
September 20th, 2007
at 7:35pm
Peter Teiman here.
It is clearly anathema to believe that children wearing eye patches are strengthening the weaker eye.
Peter Teiman
http://www.freewebs.com/peterteiman/
Peter Teiman Franklin
February 27th, 2008
at 7:57pm
Peter Teiman Franklin here,
There still seems to be some debate as to whether eye patches may weaken the eyes in the same way as glasses.
Peter Teiman Franklin,
Sweden
Peter Teiman Franklin
February 27th, 2008
at 7:59pm
Peter Teiman Franklin here,
Certainly there does not appear to be much evidence that eye exercises strengthens eyes.
Peter Teiman Franklin,
Sweden