Why I Switched from Rhapsody to Spotify

I have been a huge fan of Rhapsody for quite a while. As a music fan and long-time believer in the idea that music drives an increase in productivity, the integration of at least one of the several big music services into my home office was natural.

Pandora One offers a pretty great service that provides a great unpredictable stream of music that can introduce you to new artists, and keep you entertained throughout the day. The one thing that service lacks is the ability for you to listen to a specific artist, album, or song when you really want to.

So, Rhapsody became my favorite music service and has been for about a year now. It allows me the ability to enjoy music in abundance with music from a wide range of artists including some of my favorite obscure Industrial tracks that I have a very hard time finding anywhere else. Boole’s Blow Up the World being one of them.

Still, Rhapsody is not without its drawbacks. Until recently, I thought that it really was the “best” music service for me. Thanks to a few members of the Gnomies community, I soon found out that Spotify offers quite a few nifty features that Rhapsody doesn’t.

Here are some reasons I made the switch from Rhapsody to Spotify.

Social Integration

This feature is certainly not the best for everyone, and I even turn the social sharing bits of Spotify off from time to time. After all, do I really want everyone on my Facebook friends list to know how many times I listen to cheesy 90s music?

That said, I have enjoyed the panel on the right side of the Windows app that lets me know what my friends are listening to. I’ve discovered some pretty great tracks thanks to this feature, and some great conversations between myself and Robert Glen Fogarty (our editor here at LockerGnome) have resulted that wouldn’t have taken place if it wasn’t for Spotify’s social integration.

Turning your personal sharing on or off is as easy as toggling a few commands in the preferences menu. You can even share your musical tastes on Last.FM, which could cause a few Last.FM holdouts to consider converting.


Rhapsody has playlists, and that’s not exactly a killer feature here, but hear me out. One of the primary reasons I switched to Spotify was a particular playlist Robert shared for St. Patrick’s Day called Paddy, Not Patty!

The playlist itself I absolutely love, and Spotify has a built-in feature that makes it easy to copy a URL and share it with friends, family, and coworkers so they too can experience what you’re experiencing. You could create a new playlist, and share it on the Web through MyPlaylistIsBetterThanYours.com or some other site that allows you to share your musical discoveries with the world, and find something new you never would have known about, otherwise.

It’s not so much that Spotify does something here that Rhapsody doesn’t, but the real advantage (for me) is in how it does it. Execution is everything in software, and Spotify nailed it with this one.

Rhapsody is Limiting

You can only install Rhapsody on a certain number of devices, else you’ll be paying extra to add additional devices to your account. This makes sharing the Rhapsody service with my wife more expensive than keeping it to myself. In a household where more than one person uses a smartphone, this isn’t ideal in the least.

I’m also surprised that Rhapsody hasn’t created any native applications for OS X, giving Windows the only advantage of this option. While it does allow you to listen to music directly from the site (an advantage over Spotify in this instance) I’m personally still a fan of native programs. Perhaps it’s a sign of my age, but I feel better knowing that it runs as a separate application from my browser.

Further to that, I noticed that Spotify allows me to use my multimedia keyboard controls to play, pause, and switch tracks. Rhapsody, even with the native app, doesn’t. If there is one killer feature apart from social integration, this is it. Why would you use a media player that doesn’t take advantage of the buttons on your keyboard specifically designed for this purpose? C’mon Rhapsody!

Offline Playback

Spotify has one feature that I’ve come to greatly appreciate, especially when I have to deal with a data cap from my service provider. Offline playback allows me to store the music locally in order to play it back, even when an Internet connection isn’t readily available. If there are specific tracks you listen to frequently, this could be considered a great feature for you, especially when your connection is pretty iffy.

To be fair, Rhapsody has this feature for the iPhone client, but that doesn’t do a lot of good for folks like me that prefer to listen from the desktop.

iTunes Integration

I love that I can plug my iPod in or open my iTunes library from within Spotify. This allows me to experience all of my music, even the stuff I’ve downloaded through various other sources out there, in a single program. I really don’t need to open iTunes at all, and I know there are a few of your reading this that would count that in the WIN column.

Spotify will even sync with my iPhone or Android device via Wi-Fi. I mean c’mon, really?!


Spotify has some pretty useful apps available to it. Radio (which is often pointed out as a weakness of Spotify based on earlier versions of the service), top lists, Last.FM, and a number of other apps can change the way you discover music through Spotify.

One of my morning routines is checking the Top Lists app to catch up on the latest and greatest music out there. I’ve discovered a few artists using this feature I probably would never have heard about, otherwise.

Music is About the Experience

Music is supposed to be an experience, and any musician out there will probably agree that their audience’s experience should be as seamless and natural as possible. Being able to right-click and copy a URL that goes directly to a specific song within Spotify to share with a friend via an IM client is about as natural as sharing music can get.

I just love checking my inbox (on Spotify) and seeing music that my friends have sent me. Being able to share and receive recommendations in such a fluid and natural way makes the experience of music richer and more enjoyable.

With Spotify’s free service, and other music services such as Pandora doing the same, I wonder why people even pirate music anymore. It’s freely available at your fingertips, and there’s probably a service out there that fits your needs almost exactly. For me, I may have found my match with Spotify.

How do you listen to music? Do you purchase music online, subscribe to a specific service, or do you still buy CDs?

Article Written by

Ryan Matthew Pierson has worked as a broadcaster, writer, and producer for media outlets ranging from local radio stations to internationally syndicated programs. His experience includes every aspect of media production. He has over a decade of experience in terrestrial radio, Internet multimedia, and commercial video production.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Randy-Kirk/1222560951 Randy Kirk

    give audiogalaxy a try, its free and it works great

  • Brad Tomlinson

    I use Pandora on my Android smartphone.

  • ‘Tis Moi

    I was a first-responder when Pandora began- had lots of playlists. It was about the same time as the then, CD-swapping, La-La started up…Perfect timing- I found new music through Pandora & swapped away old CD’s for the new artists I found…bliss!  Then, life happened  and I found myself on the other side of the planet. No more access for me, outside the US, to Pandora (& La-La is gone now, too). So, now I count on music reviews, my kids, & other people to pique my interest in new stuff. 8tracks.com is also on occasionally, as is Lushfm.com (my AVR has ethernet input so I can listen to ‘net radio). It may be time to check out Spotify & Audiogalaxy (as a reader here has suggested). Thanks for the article!

  • Bryan Miner

    I made the switch to Spotify from Rhapsody about two weeks after the service was available in the U.S. I use the native iOS and OS X apps and have it on my PC (rarely use it). For me it was first the money, $14 for Rhapsody with one mobile device, $9 for Spotify with 3 mobiles. I love the local file ability. 

    • https://plus.google.com/112301869379652563135/posts Matt Ryan


    • LemonEssence

      Actually 14.99 a month gets you 3 devices on Rhapsody. I’ve had it for YEARS!

  • John

    I still buy CD’s, records and cassettes. I’ve downloaded mp3’s, and do trade airchecks via MP3,  CD and cassette. I prefer uncompressed audio and believe there is a difference. I’ll listen to web streams also, but prefer anolog wide-band AM Stereo and FM Stereo. Satelite radio (though I have it) sounds like crap.


      FM radio died in 1983!

  • Alex Smith

    I’ve used spotify in the UK for over a year now, and I’m loving it. Only problem is that some bands/labels/publishers have boycotted the service as the business model doesn’t appear to bring in enough money for them…so I still have to buy albums off iTunes in those cases.


      99 cents just to download 1 track, times all the tracks you would want to download? ITunes=Ripoff..And The Beatles catalogue is on there…. SACRELIGOUS!!

  • nigahiiii

    The 60s,70s,80s and 90s<3 THIS guy has everything!! take a look, maybe subscribe;)

  • nigahiii

    The 60s,70s,80s and 90s<3 This guy has everything in his list!;)) it's insanely smoooth. take a look, maybe subscribe;)

    • nigahiii

      The 60s,70s,80s and 90s<3

  • JohnR

    I just don’t understand the idea of having to pay a monthly fee to listen to songs you like. If you’re going to listen to a song many times, why not just buy it? In the long run, you’ll save money. Or if you typically only listen to most songs once or a few times, you might be happy with just a free Pandora account.

  • Aaron Greenhill

    I think it pays well for itself… I get the best of both worlds.

    New music – yes. Favorites, saved away – yes. Playlists available in all places (cloud-based) -yes. Freely roam around for new artists, new albums, etc – yes.

    Works for me.

  • Matt

    Actually, Rhapsody has always had the concept of offline playback from the desktop client. You can even have it integrate with Windows Media Player, or any other ‘Plays-For-Sure’ compatible player. Just right-click on any song in your current playlist and select ‘Download’. It downloads a WMA file to your desktop that you can use for offline playback.


    No telephone support, like Rhapsody has; for “customer support” for billing, streaming issues .HORRIBLE..Spotify!!


    One huge drawback with Rhapsody..Not compatible with Windows 7, 64 bit system.

    • Paul

      It’s compatible with my Windows 7 64 bit system…

  • Destek

    Rhapsody’s latest software no longer lets you play music from your own library in any playlist – unless they have that song in THEIR library. This is absolutely stupid as I have a huge library of songs Rhapsody will NEVER have in their library (many of which, by the way, I purchased through MusicMatch and Yahoo music – antecedents of Rhapsody). Their web site says I can submit a request for them to add a song and they will “consider” it. That is laughable. This, whether they intended it or not, is a strategic move the music industry must be behind. It moves us all farther from the ability to own copies of music tracks/albums we have purchased under a model that’s been around for a century. All music tracks you have purchased are becoming deprecated and we are being transitioned to a model where you can only access music on-line, and only music that is the most popular. That may be ok for the kiddies now – but as we age we will find the music we love simply evaporating from the surface of the planet. Where are my Richard Harris, Jimmy Webb and Limelighter songs, my Irene Ryan Broadway tunes…
    While this may come off as a curmudgeonly screel – consider the consequences of this model that will quickly relegate even today’s music to exist only on aging backup LTO backup tapes and eventually scrapped for lack of physical storage space. Only profitable music will be accessible – music defined by the tastes of a generation twixt the ages of 12 and 20 who will lament their loss of musical cultural identity as the next generation begins to define what they may access.