Now this is what I am talking about. While I respect the belief that embedded MS is somehow superior to what you might find with Linux, this guy is not sure how to present his point. Something is wrong here. If I was going to explain just what one option offers over another, you would think that I would be able to bullet point them without asking for advice from others?

I am doing a presentation on M/S embedded operating systems for the final stage of an interview. I have produced slides on M/S embedded in general, XP embedded and CE5.0. I am ok with these - ie what they offer and the main differences between the two (real time, X86 etc etc..), but the last slide is a ‘free slide’ it can be anything we want to talk about. I chose M/S Embedded vs Linux. The problem is, how can I best present the argument in favour of Microsoft in one slide? [Read the rest]