Abortion Vaccine Dyslexia Patch Half Brain Biometrics
- 3
- Add a Comment
- No Related Post
Bans ‘do not cut abortion rate’
You mean like prohibition? Really?
German army gets special swine flu vaccine without controversial additives given to general public
You can’t have it but they can.
Children can ‘imagine away’ pain
So can adults. The mind is a very powerful weapon.
Researchers Say Chinese Dyslexia More Complex
And they tell me not to stereotype?
Senate panel backs healthcare reform
Get ready… And remember - KY isn’t covered.
Microsoft releases biggest patch on record
Big holes require big patches.
There’s No Way to Enforce a Texting While Driving Ban
Not that this would stop them from enacting one…
Americans Are Getting Used to Perpetual War
Because Americans are perpetually stupid
Goldman Sachs set to announce record $23billion bonus pot
See - they were too big to fail!
Despite denials, Feds knew of Merrill bonuses
You mean they lied to us?
“We simply disagree that he has done nothing,”
Nobel defends Obama decision…
Born with half a brain, woman living full life
Went on to become Speaker of the House.
Obama approved 13,000 more troops to Afghanistan unannounced
Order more body bags and start impeachment procedures.
THERE’S NO SUCH THINGS AS BIG BROTHER department
Handgun Ammo Purchases in California: Driver’s License, Thumbprint and Sales Records for Police
FBI Doing Facial Recognition Scans on DMV Photo Records
FBI Building “Multi-Modal Biometrics” Database
Waco Siege “Enforcer” To Rule Over Global Police Force
Important One-Liners
Richard Belzer calls out the Federal Reserve on HBO
‘Wild Things’ Author Maurice Sendak To Concerned Parents: Go To Hell!
Flu Vaccinations: It’s a Jab or Your Job
3 Comments
Buffet
October 14th, 2009
at 12:37pm
I learn SO MUCH here! By the way, did my e-mail concerning Disinformation come through?
Buffalo
October 16th, 2009
at 12:01am
The Nobel Foundation has a political agenda. It’s about avoiding warfare and promoting peace. They use the peace prize to focus world attention on individuals who have either achieved success in promoting peace or on individuals who are in a position to promote peace. Anybody that is looking for something else other than the promotion of their political agenda is naive.
Usually, the people, who are bothered by the people selected for the peace prize, are unhappy because they have a different political agenda than the person chosen. Otherwise, most people have only casual interest in who won the Nobel Peace Prize.
It’s a Swedish thing. If they feel like giving out prizes for peace, they give it out to who they want to. It’s not like the rest of the world gets a vote. All of the people saying how debased the Nobel Peace Prize is because of this year,s selection probably can’t name the last two winners and will change their minds when it is given out to another Mother Theresa. I bet most of them can’t tell you the first name of the man who funded the prize and whose name is borne by the prize.
The criteria is: To the person who “shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” As soon as the phrase “shall have done the most” was included in the description, the award became controversial.
The people who believe that it was awarded for some other reason (and there are a host of them: bribe for US favor, race, etc.) need to do something other than study their own navels.
leftystrat
October 16th, 2009
at 7:53am
I’d never argue with their right to award a prize to whomever they wanted to, as a private entity. However, temporal displacement doesn’t count. “Shall have done…”
“We disagree that he has done nothing.”
Nice.