Doesn’t This Bother Anyone?
- 2
- Add a Comment
State Department publication #7277 states that America’s military must become subservient to the United Nations, specifically in the area of gun control.
I wouldn’t call myself a constitutional scholar but I can’t find United Nations anywhere in there. Our contract is not with the United Nations.
—> Before you go calling me a Gun Nut, I don’t own one.
I am naturally suspicious of any sentence that has United Nations in it. There have been many attempts to give up some of our sovereignty to this bogus organization and there will be many more. No matter how good an idea it might seem, it isn’t. If we have problems, we need to address them within constitutionally-approved guidelines. Anything else is turning over power to an outside organization and we don’t want that, do we?
Obama has already talked about legislating that America give a certain percentage of income to poor nations, through the United Nations.
The answer is NO.
First of all, this should not be legislated. Second, in no way should it go through the United Nations.
PART TWO
WASHINGTON - “The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, Pentagon officials said.
Troops are not to be used against the population. President Stupid did his best to destroy Posse Comitatus and this appears to be another step in someone’s evil plan.
`…other domestic catastrophe’ my ass.
Suddenly all those patriot militia groups don’t look as crazy as you thought, do they?
2 Comments
Andrew
December 6th, 2008
at 5:43pm
I completely agree with you, our government is getting bigger by the day and everybody’s rights are becoming less important. The UN is an organization is an organization that has never worked. Since the UN was created, no wars have been won and no conflicts have come to a solution.
the oracle
December 6th, 2008
at 8:25pm
Well, I susally agree with you, but we diverge almost completely here.
The U.N. doesn’t work, but that is no reason to take our marbles and go home. It simply means that the U.N. must fulfill more of the work in its charter, and be MUCH more responsive to trouble in the world. It is precisely the fact that everyone else (from other countries) saw Bush 43 move unilaterally, without U.N. sanction, that we have some of the troubles we do now.
The U.N. needs to rethink the ‘Security Council’ as it has been a joke for a while now, and also needs to work from a point of unity, gained by logical moves agrred to by the members. Like the US Congress, it needs to have a way of cutting through the bogging down of action by some pinhead standing at the podium, doing his best to waste time.
It is certainly flawed, but without it things would be much worse.