divide and conquer
- 1
- Add a Comment
There is only one political party.
Yes, that’s right. One party. I know this won’t make sense to some of you. I’m going to go ahead, probably because I like the pain.
The American Public has undergone some form of electoral cultural brainwashing. For some strange reason, people believe there are two political parties. They will spend the rest of their lives attempting to prove their point and the justness of their cause. They will not stop to listen to the people from the `other side,’ who are also trying to prove their point and the justness of their cause.
Oooh, the republicans this… and the democrats that… do you want more of the same… tax and spend.. liberals.. christo-fascists.. neocons.. left wing.. religious right.. tree hugger..
You are delusional.
You have consumed the Kool-Aid and now believe fervently. It is so much a fact that you never stop to question it. It just IS. R vs D.
This is what we call divide and conquer. The populace is kept so busy arguing McCain vs Obama that they miss the bigger picture. This is precisely the reason for divide and conquer. If you add in lipstick and sprinkle in a little muslim, it’s even better.
There is only one party. It’s the party of GREED. We live in a kleptocracy, to quote Dr. Steven Greer. There’s not a lot of practical difference between one wing of the greed party and the other, yet all we hear are heated debates about which wing did this and will do that. Divide and conquer.
One party candidate has publicly stated that Bush didn’t send enough troops to Iraq. Another candidate has a lot of Change that will eventually have to be paid for - somehow. Neither wing of Greed is looking out for You. Both will take your money, perhaps in different ways, but they’ll take your money and that of your descendants for generations. At the same time they’ll take your rights.
But you’ll still argue that there’s a difference between wings of the party. Divide and conquer.
One wing behaved so badly that the other wing got voted into Congress en masse, on the promise they’d clean up. Once in, all that silly rhetoric about cleaning up conveniently disappeared. There isn’t two cents worth of difference between the two wings of the Greed party.
School, news, and culture won’t teach you about a slew of third parties (which I refer to as second parties). Nah, only crazies vote for third party candidates. Well, let’s face it, folks…. there isn’t a good candidate on either wing of the Greed party. You have a duty to yourself and your country to choose a different party.
Even if I disagree with your choice of third party candidate, I respect you for using your brain and making your vote count. Stop the farce now. Let’s put an end to the molestation of our constitution. Use your ballot to affect peaceful change. Even with a few `faulty voting machines’, the message would be heard across the country.
It’s wonderful to see more action with third parties. I see a lot more than I expected. This tells me that way more people are awake and paying attention. And that they’re very unhappy with the kleptocracy.
Of course the unbelievers will hit you with all the cliches, like you’re wasting your vote. They couldn’t be more wrong. A vote for the kleptocracy, for Greed, is a waste of a vote. If you’re going to vote for third parties, you’ll get Change. None of them are perfect but they’re a heck of a lot better than the current regime(s).
Hell, even a plank of wood could do a better job (that was not an Al Gore reference).

One Comment
Kevin Bailey
September 15th, 2008
at 1:08pm
I will be with you “wasting” my vote on one, not sure which one yet, of the “third” parties out there. I like you see little difference in the “two” parties in power now. I want change and I don’t want Obama. I want a Republic that lets the states and individuals be responsible for what we are as a nation but I don’t want McCain.
Where to go, which to choose? As you suggest anyone of them would be a better choice then the “leading” candidates.