E-Mail:

five minutes in the life of a blogger / [speaking pig-english]

There is a tremendous disconnect between what I type and what people read.  I’ve only recently started to realize this.  I always blamed it on the Frank Zappa-ism, “People are stupid”, but it turns out there are many finer points to the equation.

By no means am I stating that people aren’t stupid - heaven forbid. I know some people who make me thankful that breathing is covered by the autonomous nervous system.  If they had to remember to breathe, they’d be long dead.

I am told I write decently, have a good vocabulary, and speak clearly (or so said my second grade teacher anyway).  It’s just that when I write something or send emails, the answer I get has absolutely nothing to do with the question I asked.  Let’s take a simulated real-life situation….

blogger: Ha ha… Hillary Clinton sews socks that smell!  She won’t touch Bill with his own ten foot pole.

No, really, I’m just kidding.  I have no idea what Hillary does in her spare time.

commenter: how DARE you say that about Hillary.

commenter #2 :  You know, it’s possible that Bill was partially responsible.  You shouldn’t say such things.

——————————–

I’m not blaming anybody or calling them illiterate.  I’m just really curious about why people don’t seem to read what I typed.  If I omitted the second line, I’d say they possibly had a point.  But it’s right there.  Or at least I see it right there.

Here’s another recent conversation:

me: I’d like that guitar in blue.

salesman: Ok.

me: The problem is that when I try to order the deluxe version, it doesn’t come in blue.

salesman: Hmmm.  Yes, the cheap version comes in blue.

me: Yes, it was advertised as coming in blue.  Why can’t I get the deluxe version in blue?

salesman: Only the cheap version comes in blue.

This is starting to feel like a bad Spinal Tap outtake.  But it gets better (or worse, depending…)

me: It’s the same guitar.

salesman: Only the cheap version comes in blue.

and so on….

————————————–

If I send out a work email like so:

We’re shutting down the file server at 5:00 for maintenance.

I will receive one or more of the following responses:

  • Will there be email?
  • Will I be able to access my files after 5:00?
  • Can I make a phone call now?

And, precisely at 5:03:

  • HEY - WHY CAN’T I GET TO MY EXCEL FILES?
  • WHAT email?

————————————–

You grammar experts will notice that I have a subject (We’re), an object (the file server) , a nasal descriptive (for maintenance) and the third person fricative (at 5:00).  The sentence structure leaves very little room for guessing — unless you are the one reading it.

If you have any guesses as to what’s going wrong, please leave me a comment.

Meanwhile, I have to go.  I’m giving a lecture series on brain surgery and I want to make sure I’ve typed out all my notes correctly.

5 Comments

I object to that last bit– you shouldn’t imply that brain surgeons can’t type correctly. You know it could be that the IT guys didn’t put the right typing thing on the computer. Did you ever think about *that*?

Seriously, though, I wish I had an answer for you, but you’re always relatively clear from my perspective. Maybe it’s the ’speak to them on their level’ thing? Frightening. It could also be that most of the time people are thinking about what *they* are going to say in response to whatever you’re saying (that they aren’t listening to anyway).

e-rain: does the revelation that I come through clearly not frighten you? Maybe you’re every bit as *%&#ed up as I am.

On the bright side, maybe we can get a group discount on meds.

Thanks, as usual!

I think the group size is getting larger by the read. What is my cut on the meds…..

by the way what was Hillary doing to the file server anyway. Or was that Bill with the blue guitar in the jazz room…

but I understand everything now - OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!! Pass the mushrooms please.

Hummm, I have that problem too.

* They don’t actually *read* (or at least comprehend) the email
* When it *seems* like they read it, they don’t actually answer a) any of the questions asked b) all of the questions c) the *actual* questions asked or d) b and c

Perhaps this will shed some light: http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2007/04/my_new_favorite.html

OTOH, no one else in my company documents anything, and many of them don’t communicate anything either, so I tend to try and over-compensate for them. Naturally, that results in many folks having auto-delete-anything-from-JP email rules, which just exacerbates the problem… ( I said, “exacerbates”… :)

Kevin: well spoken. Cardboard.

JP: it’s not just me?
I often suspect Scott Adams walks the halls of my last employer.

Always remember: communication is VERBOTEN.

Same email problem but I refer to it as the Ignore Flag.

Not that I wish you guys a bad time but misery loves a warm machine gun, you know?

What Do You Think?

 
73 queries / 0.335 seconds.