E-Mail:
Get our new Windows 7 eBook (PDF) for $7 with 70+ Tips. Download Now!

Nau or Later: Sustainable Businesses are Built to Last, or are they?

Over a year ago, I met with the marketing team at Nau, the sustainable outdoor fashion manufacturer/retailer.  I was amazed, and frankly, skeptical, of their altruistic vision and aggressive growth plans.   Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to provide search engine marketing services due to a conflict of interest with prAna, another client of ours.  Regardless, I followed the start-up through hair-raising rounds of financing through business rags, silently rooting them on.  They have survived, this far at least.  This week I attended a Portland Business Journal Power Breakfast featuring Nau’s CEO, Chris Van Dyke.  A very well-spoken and down-to-earth ex-Nike & Patagonia executive, Van Dyke came out of retirement (for the second time) to lead Nau.  He clearly articulated why being green is more than just good business, it’s great business.  He discussed how the Nau brand attributes (fashion, technology and sustainability) have actually created a larger market potential, by encompassing urbanites, outdoor enthusiasts, athletes and environmentalists.  Of course if you’ve ever been to one of their 4 stores, like I recently experienced in Bridgeport Village, you’d see a wide swath of humanity browsing with overt curiosity and amazement.  One intriguing aspect of the Nau business model is the groundbreaking philanthropic mantra of donating 5% of sales (not profits) to charities that customers choose from a select list.  While this may appear to add insult to injury when purchasing a $200 shirt, it’s actually a thoughtful marketing strategy; the charities are vested in Nau’s success and promote them vigorously to membership.  On the manufacturing side of the business, Van Dyke explained why Nau doesn’t patent unique sustainable fabrics it develops, as it is smart for business: it lowers Nau’s cost when other companies purchase the fabrics in bulk.  While not quite as sexy, but still revolutionary, Nau also minimizes it’s retail footprint by offering shoppers a 10% discount if they select the option to ship to their house instead of carrying out the items.  If I hadn’t just read Seth Godin’s new book, Meatball Sundae, I wouldn’t have understood the inverse curve of only low cost and high cost products surviving in the marketplace where formerly average product thrived.  I’ve come to the realization that Nau may just beat the odds and skeptics by living in a very special place in the socially conscious consumer’s heart & mind.

Nau Logo

3 Comments

The concept of “green business” has been around for awhile, but it seems that only recently it has gained any real traction. It will be interesting to see if this is just a short term surge of interest by big business, or sustainability is actually sustainable. I also wonder if a company like Nau, would survive in a less-environmentally sensitive city, like say, New York. At the end of the day the consumer will decide if “green” focused companies survive, and if history is any indication, they won’t. The majority of consumers shop for value. They shop hard for the best product they can find for the lowest price…which would suggest that “average products” will continue to thrive.

Well, unfortunately nau didn’t last. I believe that they were to far ahead of themselves. It’s happened many times, remember the Newton! It’s very scary, because nau seemed like a company that was going to beat the odds.

I recently started a small company, making wooden toys  http://www.ukunto.com). Ukunto builds toys in socially responsible ways, with the smallest carbon footprint possible. By far not as innovative as nau, but it definitely gives me the chills and makes me even more alert to what is happening out in the jungle of reality.

I still believe that nau was right though with it’s business conduct (I blame the recession more than bad business conduct) and I will try to incorporate as many of their ideas and philosophies as possible.

Cheers, Hans

Ummm….hello? REI’s been testing the development of “green” clothing for years. I’d feel bad for the investors who ponied up $35 million to this company, but since the company wasn’t exactly run out of a garage (choosing instead to have its offices in the pearly Pearl District of Portland), what do you expect? This is .com bubble all over again for the investors of this company! When will people learn?!?

What Do You Think?

 

Posted Recently

39 queries / 0.284 seconds.