Archive for Talk
Best Notebooks For Your Money
Obviously, the Apple Macbook Pro ought to have been on this list as it does a fantastic job running Windows via boot camp. Yet again, Acer and Lenovo seem to be coming out on top. Frankly, I think Acer makes a great notebook with Lenovo remaining a crowd favorite amongst the enterprise class.
What I have been trying to figure out is “why”? What about those two models has people feeling so confident in the two offerings? Each is generally well made to be sure, but there are HPs that might in some instances, surpass the quality if not blow it out of the water in a collective sense.
Think you have a notebook that is better than any of the ten listed? Want to share which one it is? Hit the comments and sound off with what you believe to be king of the notebooks and why.
Microsoft Needs Yahoo!
It’s a simple fact. MSN as a content service has been largely a less than successful effort. And Yahoo! would frankly allow Yahoo! to take over an existing online property that has eyeballs. What it does with those eyeballs after that is up to Microsoft.
Yahoo! could likely keep skipping along without Microsoft, but it could potentially see a surge as Microsoft could infuse it with the capital it needs. Microsoft would do well to purchase Yahoo! as expected and despite whatever you may hear, Microsoft knows full well that it will be massively easier to use Yahoo!’s content network to gain market share than continue throwing money at its own.
Am I wrong? Is MSN in a strong enough position to retool, and simply take on Yahoo! as to make it a moot point in response should Yahoo! opt to not allow the take-over? Hit the comments; you decide.
Indiana Jones And The Lost Emails
Do we take email reliability/deliverability for granted? I’m talking about email that traverses the Internet (e.g. outside of internal corporate email delivery, which there should be no question about reliability).
It seems to me that I’ve had an increase in the number of complaints/reports from some of my clients about lost emails in the past 6 months. In some cases, it was emails that they sent friends or customers that never arrived. In other cases, it was mail that was sent to them that they never received. Some of my clients were particularly distressed because the lost messages were to (or from) customers of their own.
In some cases, there were non-delivery receipts (NDRs, or “bounce messages“), but in many cases, the message simply never made it, and there was no NDR sent back. NDRs can sometimes provide a breadcrumb of a clue as to the reason for the delivery failure (but not always).
These days, once your email leaves your ISP or email provider’s outgoing server, it has to run a gauntlet of sorts. There are so many anti-spam measures out there — at so many different levels — that I’m not surprised by the phenomenon of lost emails.
First, ISPs and email providers of all stripes have instituted various Anti-Spam measures. Some of these can be tweaked by end users (white lists, spam sensitivity, spam filtering on/off), others are more rigid and are controlled at the infrastructure and server level by administrators. Then you have anti-spam measures at the endpoint, typically anti-spam features built in to a given email client (e.g. Outlook, Outlook Express, OS X Mail.app) and sometimes Junk Mail software that’s part of a security software suite.
I’m sure I’ve left out other elements of the virtual gauntlet, but you get my point. Spammers have created such a backlash of countermeasures, that there is always going to be some percentage of legitimate email that gets caught in the dragnet. By legitimate, I mean email that there is no question that the recipient wants to get. I know the definition of legit email can be very much an “eye of the beholder” thing, but that’s a topic for another discussion.
In each of the cases I dealt with, I made sure to remind my clients be familiar with the anti-spam measures and policies that their ISP/email providers had in place as well as to learn the junk mail features of their email client and any security software they may be running. In parallel, they should encourage their clients and friends to do the same. Education and awareness are the key elements. Beyond that, I don’t know much more than can be done.
I still think there is some parallel universe out there — full of lost keys, missing socks, and emails that never made it to their destination.
Cinemanow Or CinemaWhy?
Have to admit, it has been awhile since I have seen something so completely ‘head-scratchingly’ lame that I just could not hold it in any longer. Now normally, if we were to hear about something cool like being able to do something with a mobile phone, it is generally with the intent of enjoy the fruits of your labor ON THE PHONE.
Take watching movies on your phone. Not generally something I am inclinded to do, but having this as an option for bragging rights might be fun, right? Again, I realize that using the word ‘practical’ is not a great plan here, but bear with me.
Now consider this - Cinemanow mobile. In short, install software onto your PC that is frankly no different that the countless other clones of the same thing out there these days for watching movies on your PC, then go someplace and order the movies on your phone. Yeah, that is it…
So basically, I am supposed to in all seriousness, get excited because I can make an online purchase of a movie from my mobile phone? Uh, could one not do this with their phone already? And really, considering there is no other benefit that trying to get you to use their service over someone else’s, where is the clear benefit to you, the user? Not to be mean, but it appears that the idea of distinguishing themselves from others out there doing much of the same thing was so hot that day, that any possibile reason to care was completely left by the wayside. In short, unless you are providing me with moves on my phone, I hardly find this compelling in any way shape or form. Oh wait, you can browse and watch trailers! Come on, seriously, this is just boring.
Give me a Slingbox any day of the week or even access to a Vudu with the ability to plugin to a Slingbox. Heck, these days it even supports the BlackBerry! Then, someone might actually bother trying it.
OLPC Changes Face
This was a long time coming. As neat as the OLPC project was in the beginning, it was due for a change as it was simply not meeting the needs as initially thought. And while the idea of Windows XP might not be my first choice, it is a darn sight better than the “sugar” distribution of Linux I have tested out myself in the past. Sugar for XP, is even more hair brained as the UI is still flawed.
At the end of the day, I honestly do not have all of the answers that best suit the future of this project. While I believe that taking a Linux route would be more economical in the long run, if Microsoft is willing to make Windows XP available, awesome, go for it. Just make darn sure that some of the security features provided in Vista are available in these XP installations as they will otherwise, be food for XP ready malware. A special, stripped down Vista may have made more sense. But this is just my thinking realizing that we really do not need more newbies with XP downloading everything in sight.
Am I wrong? Is XP, with its benefits and flaws, really the best choice from a security standpoint for developing nations? Hit the comments, you be the judge.
Craigslist Brought It On Itself?
I actually found a comment whereas the submitter mentioned that eBay is going to “eat Craigslist from the inside out.” After checking into this latest news about Craigslist being sued by eBay, I frankly believe that Craigslist quite possibly brought it upon itself… or did it?
Unlike the myth that Microsoft still owns Apple shares, which, back when they were outstanding, were non-voting shares only to be sold off a few years ago, eBay actually has a very real stake in Craigslist. Surprised? Well before outwardly blaming Craigslist for allowing this to happen, consider this.
“Mr. Newmark and the Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster said in separate messages posted on the Web that they never imagined a stake in Craigslist ending up in the hands of a publicly-traded company. Still, the former Craigslist executive made it clear to the company that he intended to sell his shares and began approaching other parties, including eBay. “
So who is really telling the truth? If it was me, I think I am going to lean with the non-publicly traded, undervalued company run out of a large house. Why? Read closely…
“eBay’s motivation could also partly be defensive, allowing it to keep a stake in Craigslist out of a competitor’s hands and giving it the chance to acquire the remainder of Craigslist should the company’s founders decide to sell, according to a person familiar with the matter.“
But this comment is dated as of 2004 - a lot has changed since then, including a better understanding why so many are seeking to do business with Craigslist - it’s generally free to use and would not really recoup the other 75% of investment. Another possibility is that it might simply be cheaper to sue the company silly later on…
Today’s eBay is full of honest sellers and crooks alike. The same can certainly be said for Craigslist. But because one of these companies encourages face-to-face sales, over that of having a product shipped to you, it seems that Craigslist stands to be a better avenue for many sellers and buyers looking not to be ripped off through the mail.
Is Craigslist in real trouble here? It is entirely too early to tell for sure. One thing is for sure, eBay is hiding something and the winner will be the one with the best legal team.
AMD No More?
I have been a staunch AMD fan for years. Not on notebooks mind you, but for my desktop, I just could never justify paying “Intel Tax” and throwing money away for something I could do for substantially cheaper with an AMD chip. Despite my loyalty to this hard luck company, they ‘brilliantly” opted to purchase ATI, which I think they were foolish for doing so. Not that I have anything against ATI on OS X or Windows, rather I simply could not see AMD as being healthy enough to absorb them as a company. To me, it felt like sidestepping the issue of truly competing with Intel.
These days, I am stilling running my old AMD Athlon 64 3700+ CPU to this day on my primary box - it has never missed a beat and has survived plenty of hardware upgrades. Older, sure, but a great CPU. But perhaps for the first time ever when it comes time for me to finally bothering to upgrade my CPU due to its age, not my need to keep up with any one OS, I may end up going with Intel.
I hate to make the switch, but I simply do not feel that AMD is serious about their desktop market any longer. It feels like it is all about their fight within the server market, thus leaving the desktop world to Intel. Considering my new notebook is powered by Intel (thanks to my friends at System76.com), it is beginning to make sense to switch out my motherboard/CPU/etc for something Intel based as well.
Obviously being a geek, I most certainly will build the PC myself as I have always done. However this time, I will not likely be with my once beloved AMD chip. No, I am afraid unless something drastic changes, I may move over to Intel for good. Am I nuts? Should I just bite the bullet and stick with AMD?
An Open And Shut Case
I’ve had more laptop cases over the years than I can remember… big cases, small cases, and in-between sized cases. I’ve managed to unload some of my surplus cases via yard sales, craigslist, and The Salvation Army. I kept a Brenthaven backpack style case for my MacBook Pro, and mostly use it for my local urban travels in and around Chicago (oftentimes on public transit). But I felt I needed something better for when I go out of town.
My business travel is relatively infrequent these days — but it isn’t always a business trip that requires me to bring my laptop. I had a decent medium-sized briefcase style case that had a strap on it to slip over the handle on a “roll-aboard” suitcase. The last time I traveled with this combination, I found it to be less than optimal. I was fine with the laptop case while it piggybacked on the handle of the rolling suitcase, but when I checked the suitcase (it was a little too large for carry on), it became a nuisance.
For example, having a traditional briefcase style case with a shoulder strap isn’t too much fun in a long TSA security line. You have two choices: You either sling it over your shoulder (passing it from shoulder to shoulder as time passes) or you try to stand it upright on the floor and kind of shove it with your feet as the line shuffles forward. More often than not, the bag will tip over, not to mention the gunk it picks up from the floor. So I decided to cave in and get a wheeled laptop case. I use the term “cave” because when I was young and foolish, I used to chuckle to myself when I saw people with wheeled laptop cases, and don’t ask me why. Now at the ripe old age of forty, I’ve joined the “wheelies.” And my shoulders (and back) are eternally grateful.
But as I researched which wheeled case to purchase, I had trouble finding one that fit all my requirements. My ideal wheeled case would need to be: preferably not black; able to be used as a traditional shoulder slung case when needed; an assortment of external pockets for smaller items; an area for document folders; and finally — a strap to allow it to piggyback on the handle of a larger rolling suitcase. It was this last requirement that seemed to make my search more of a challenge — most of the rolling cases I saw lacked the strap. I guess manufacturers thought if your laptop case was wheeled, you wouldn’t need to piggyback it to another piece of wheeled luggage. Have you tried rolling two bags at the same time — one in each hand? There is no way to do it without looking like a doofus.
So I was absolutely delighted when I came across the “Level” Carry-On Wheeled Business Tote from High Sierra. It literally hit every one of my requirements, and had a few nice features over and above. It came in several colors, I chose the Amazon/Graphite combination, which matched my sage green Eagle Creek rolling upright case. Most importantly, it had the “piggyback” strap so I could slide it on the handle of other wheeled luggage. When I checked the larger bag, I simply took the High Sierra case off, extended the handle, and presto, no problems (or pains) moving it around the airport. The other things I love about this case include the two zippered corner pockets (on either side of the sliding handle compartment), a zippered swing-out mesh water bottle compartment, and a zippered “quick stash” compartment on the front side of the bag. I looked up the case on eBags.com, and the video on the product page sold me.
This bag isn’t for everyone; many people may find it too large for their needs and tastes. But for somebody looking for a very practical wheeled laptop case, with room to spare, I would highly recommend it.
IE 8 VS Firefox 3
I think it is going to be a tight race this time around. When Firefox first started to really gain traction, Microsoft was still sitting on the defunct Internet Explorer 6 and really needed Mozilla to come up and bite them into a motivated frenzy for the good of Internet Explorer users.
Today however, with Firefox 2.x and version 3 just around the corner, along with IE 8 working through its testing stages, things are about to get interesting. I think for the first time with either browser, we are going to be seeing ideas and features that are long over due. Better security, a better line of communication with the users of these browsers and of course, timely release schedules.
While I still believe that IE8 is heavily in testing stages at this point, I have had an oportunity to use Firefox 3Beta for sometime now. I have kept up with its various updates during the testing period and I must say - it is certainly more stable that the previous release. Well, at least for my operating system (Linux). However I still cannot bring myself to accept the butchering of address window and the complete eyesore autocompleted titles instead of allowing me to skim through URLs as they once had.
Who knows, perhaps IE8 will learn from this bone headed move and one-up Firefox this time around. Because I will tell you one thing, IE7 sure one-uped Firefox 2.x with RSS feeds, that is for sure. Relying on the weak LiveBookmarks or even worse, asking me to use Google FeedReader - please. The browsers of 2008 ought to be further ahead than that. RSS feeds should be cleanly integrated, like with Opera.
So Much For Adhering To IEEE 802.11 Standards
Last week, I had occasion to switch out laptops for one of my company’s field salespeople. She happened to live just a couple miles from where I live in Chicago, so it was really easy for me to pay her a house call. We lease our Dell laptops, with laptops on a 24 month cycle (desktops are on 36 month leases).
My colleagues in our Atlanta headquarters got her new Latitude D430, dropped a standard image on it, and did some initial user customization. Then they shipped it up to her home, and I scheduled my house call so I could transfer local data from the old laptop to the new one and make sure everything worked.
I went to connect the new D430 to her Wireless LAN (powered by a Netgear WGR614v5), and I couldn’t connect. She had it setup with basic WEP encryption, and I had the WEP key handy, but every time I tried to connect to the network, I kept getting a weird error that the network was not available (even though it was listed in the “available wireless networks list” and I was 6 feet away from the router).
So I logged into the router’s setup menu from her old laptop, which was actually connected to one of the wired LAN ports on the router to confirm the various settings. I even temporarily disabled wireless security, then tried connecting again from the new laptop, and still was unable to. I noticed that the firmware for the router was pretty outdated, so I downloaded and installed the latest firmware from Netgear for that model router. I re-attempted to connect from the D430, and it still failed. Finally, I decided I was losing too much time messing around with this, and plugged in the new laptop to a wired Ethernet port so I could begin copying files over the LAN from the old laptop. I would tackle the wireless issue later.
In a short time, I got everything moved over from the old laptop to the new one. I pulled the old laptop from the docking station and plugged in the D430 into the dock. The Latitude D410 was able to connect to the WLAN just fine. I then tried to connect my own Latitude D630 to the WLAN, and it failed just like the D430. I happened to have my iPod Touch with me, so I tried connecting it to the WLAN, and it also failed. She had her husband’s Wi-Fi enabled Palm PDA nearby, and it was able to connect.
So I quickly determined that the Intel Pro Wireless LAN adapter in both the D430 and my D630 were simply incompatible with the Netgear router. The D410 had a Dell Wireless NIC and it worked fine. I’d seen this once or twice before, when a certain brand and/or model of wireless router doesn’t play well with another brand and/or model of Wireless adapter. Who really knows which side of the fence is the culprit, the router or the client adapter. Perhaps both. Whatever the case, it is still very annoying that this happens at all.
I knew she wanted to be able to use her new laptop away from her desk, so I recommended she get a Linksys router, simply because I use one at home and know it works well with all my Dell equipment. She sent me a follow up e-mail just yesterday to let me know she did get a new Linksys router, and everything is indeed working perfectly.
How To Trim Down A Windows Install For A Virtual Machine
Over at Lifehacker, Adam Pash has written an article describing in some very useful detail how to use a couple freeware apps to trim down a Windows XP installation so you can create a lighter-weight install disc for whatever purpose you may have.
I’m interested in this because I plan (at least at this point) to use a Windows Server 2003 install disc as the starting point for a VMWare Fusion virtual machine on my MacBook Air, and I want to keep it as lean and mean as I possibly can. That way I can run the couple/few Windows apps that I really need to make my computer life complete.
Why Windows Server 2003? Because I have a couple unused copies sitting on my shelf just screaming to have the shrink-wrap removed. Come to think on it, it might be the first time I have opened an actual shrink-wrapped Windows Server box since around 2000. I’ve grown quite used to electronic delivery and volume licensing discs. Wow.
Does anyone have any solid information that would point to benefits of using the 64-bit edition of Server 2003 over the 32-bit version? If so, please let me know!
I’ll report back with results after I get it all set up. Should be interesting and a bit of fun.
Malware Or Poor Planning?
As far as I am concerned, this is an indicator that all of the affected individuals in this case could eventually become victims of identity theft. Talk about a real eye opener! Sort of makes you wonder how the involved IT and security teams are in finding a long term means of defense for next time. But to be fair, it seems like it may not have been preventable as this was an entirely new kind attack.
I do not think there is really any question any longer as to the risk of not better protecting your identity and most of all, trusting others to save your bacon. Whether it be some promising software program, advice on how to better keep your data safe, whatever - in the end, it’s never enough it seems. With consumer confidence fairly shaken, I am beginning to look into ways I can better protect myself. Sure, I already have red flags setup as I am not a complete fool as I work pretty publicly these days. But I am always hearing others saying that it may never be enough. The risk just seems almost impossible to avoid these days.
So what you are thoughts? Who is responsible here and perhaps more importantly, do we have the tools to actually protect ourselves anymore? It’s one thing to take responsibility for your own system, but when a company has a “flaw”, where does this really leave you?
Comcast Rescues My Customer From DSL Hell
I’m not, repeat NOT, a Comcast fanboy. Far from it. But it did come to the rescue of one of my small business clients. In February, I posted about this client and their saga of slow DSL.
I am happy to report that I helped them successfully transition to Comcast Business Internet. So now, rather than having 134Kbps downstream, they now have about 2.5Mbps downstream. Granted, I’ve seen better speeds on Comcast, including my own Comcast HSI service… but clearly this is a huge performance gain for them. They are now paying less and getting better performance.
The transition itself couldn’t have been easier. I kept all their old DSL-based infrastructure active and intact while Comcast sent out an installer to bring in a Coax feed and set up their business router (I think it was a Comcast branded box built by SMC). Once I got the call that that task was completed, I scheduled a visit to their office.
To make the switch as pain-free as possible (for them as well as me), my approach was to reconfigure the Comcast router to use the same Subnet and DHCP ranges as their old system. That way, I would not have to reconfigure anything else on the network. I actually never was able to log in to their old router (a WatchGuard Firebox SOHO) because they had no idea of the login credentials, it was set up some years before I started doing support work for them. And I never found a good enough reason to go through the hassle of resetting it to factory defaults. No matter, it wasn’t rocket science to figure out the key bits of IP info I needed to more forward.
I had to call Comcast business support to get their router’s login creds, and within moments, I was logged in. The rest was a piece of cake. Just as I planned, I simply disconnected the old router’s patch cable from their workgroup switch, replaced it with a patch cord coming from the Comcast router, and everything worked. I told them to wait a couple weeks before turning off their old DSL service, just to be sure the Comcast service was reliable enough for them.
Proof Of Concept?
For many people, Adobe Photoshop is just too much for them to tackle all at once. Yet at the same time, most people are not totally clear on where they can pick up a copy of Elements without resorting to buying hardware like a Wacom tablet. This is possibly where Adobe’s latest Web effort could very well come into play.
Enter Adobe Photoshop Elements for the Web. What is interesting about this is while this is really not all that new of a concept, Adobe is king of this arena. So this means that the competition will really have to step up their game. Will the competition be able to take the hit? Only time will tell…
So what do you think will happen? Will Adobe become king of the Web based editing arena overnight or instead, with their competitors stand tall as Adobe makes this assault a reality?
How Not To Go Out Of Business
Several days ago, a customer of mine reported problems with remotely accessing their file server. In reality, it wasn’t a server in the strictest sense of the term, but rather a Linux-based Multi-function appliance called a Chilibox from a company called Chili Systems. I’d recommend this device for their small office back in early 2006 because of its low cost and versatility. Let’s face it, why put in a full-fledged Windows-based server for a small office when they can get all the functionality they need for a fraction of the cost?
The Chilibox performed — and continues to perform until I figure out what to replace it with — several key network functions for this client. It servers as a Firewall/Router, a wireless access point, and a shared network drive. On top of that, I have it configured to run scheduled backups to a tethered USB hard drive. It even e-mails me a backup report after it completes each backup. The other neat feature was called ChiliDrive, which allowed users to access files stored on the Chilibox remotely via the Web. This is what I mean — it is really a brilliant piece of network hardware. Here’s my review of it from May 2006.
It was this feature — ChiliDrive — that first clued us in that something was wrong. My clients were trying to access some files remotely when they noticed that the Web site didn’t look right. This site was where you would log in to your Chilibox — and the site simply was gone, replaced with boilerplate text “Welcome to your Web site creator; you have not yet published your Web site.” Oddly enough, when I did a WHOIS lookup, it said the domain is still registered to Chili Systems, Inc. Go figure. So I looked up their telephone number from some of the support documentation PDFs I had, called it, and guess what — that number was no longer in service. It was clear that Chili Systems, Incorporated was no more.
Which brings me to the point of this post… there is a right way and wrong way to cease doing business. It’s not exactly an expensive proposition to keep your Web site up a little bit longer and to put up some information informing former customers of what happened. Almost like a favorite neighborhood store that might have gone under after a Wal-Mart opened that puts a sign in the window “Thanks for your support, we lost our lease”. It would have been nice if Chili Systems at least posted something acknowledging them going out of business. But to let their domain be snatched up by some random entity and to leave customers in the lurch. Shameful.
In the meantime, I found a quick work around for their remote access conundrum by mapping a UNC on the Chilibox to a drive letter on a desktop PC on their LAN that happens to be running I’mInTouch. I’ve setup accounts for people to use so they can remote into that PC, then grab files via the mapped drive. In the long run, I’m going to build them a replacement solution, as I don’t want to keep this client running on an unsupported solution from a defunct company indefinitely. I’m thinking just a decent wireless router plus some flavor of network attached drive. Buffalo Technologies has their LinkStation Live family of NAS drives, which include the ability to remotely access files from across the Web. I’ve used other LinkStation products with a few other customers with good results, so this will likely be the direction I take.
In the end, I guess the ChiliBox was simply a great solution that too few people knew about. I’m guessing that they didn’t have the sales figures that were necessary to stay in business. I’m sure many of you can relate to this situation — when a great service, product or company just disappears without a trace.
DST Issues Revisited
It’s been a busy couple of weeks for me — hence my brief absence from Lockergnome IT Pros. I was in Las Vegas last week for a quick vacation in honor of my wife’s birthday. Played a Texas Hold ‘Em tournament at Planet Hollywood Casino and came in third place. You can read about all my adventures on my personal blog.
Last weekend, as you know, was the “Spring Forward” time under the “new” DST rules. Many of my clients are smartphone users, and I’d worked with them at the beginning of this, last year when the “Fall Back” shift was moved ahead. I’d helped many of them patch their devices, which included BlackBerries and Windows-Mobile powered devices, such as Treo 750s. I did this before the DST shift. So I was a little surprised when a couple of my clients contacted me at the beginning of the week to say their calendars were displaying everything behind an hour, not reflecting the time change to an hour forward. Why was I surprised? Because I’d already patched these devices last year.
I did some quick digging, and it appeared that Microsoft issued a Windows Mobile patch for the 2008 portion to the DST patch. This is in addition to the first patch, which addressed the Fall 2007 DST shift. The instructions for downloading and installing the patch were not very clear, and I myself don’t have a Windows Mobile device to experiment with, so it took a little trial and error for my clients to get the patch applied. But we collectively figured it out, and their Treo 750s soon displayed correctly for calendar items.
I was irked, however, that Microsoft seemingly issued this in two separate patches, instead of one patch — the one that was applied last year. Did anybody else out there have similar experiences? I know that older BlackBerry devices only needed the single patch — one that could easily be applied directly to the device over-the-air.
Why Isn’t FireWire 800 More Common?
Gnomie Elie Hassan writes:
To the best of my knowledge, FireWire 800 is capable of 800 mbp/s, which is twice as fast as USB 2.0. If this is the case, why is it such an underutilized specification? I can understand that hardware manufacturers want to make their hardware compatible with as many computers as possible, so they choose USB because it is more common. I believe that a company like Apple, which includes FireWire 800 in most if not all of its computer lineup, should definitely support it.
It just seems strange to me that not only do iPods not ship with a FireWire cable, but they are completely incapable of using a FireWire cable to transfer files. I just don’t understand how FireWire 800, which is twice the speed of USB 2.0, is so underutilized and basically non-existent (try finding a FireWire 800 external drive in most retail stores — I did and was very unsuccessful).
I think to sum it up, I understand that USB is more universal, which is why most hardware manufacturers go with it. However, a manufacturer like Apple, that includes FireWire ports in its computers, should at least support FireWire if not make it the default option.
It is puzzling, Elie. Maybe some other Gnomies would like to contribute to the discussion? Comments are welcome!
Apple TV, Take 2
As many Apple fanboys and other industry observers already know, Apple released a major overhaul of the embedded software on its Apple TV device. This coincided with the introduction of movie rentals through iTunes.
I’d first become familiar with Apple TV when I purchased one late last year. This new software makes Apple TV, in my opinion, almost a threat to TiVo and Amazon Unbox. I emphasized almost because it still lacks video recording capability. Still, it is a great upgrade, and hopefully the shape of things to come.
I decided to kick the tires on the movie rental feature last night and rented the HD version of Resident Evil: Extinction, which, as zombie movies go, is a lot of fun. The download took a while to complete, although I’m not sure how large a file transfer was involved because that part of the transaction is hidden. Like Amazon Unbox, once the transfer gets to a certain point, you can actually start watching the video while it completes the download in the background.
The video quality was excellent on my 32″ Vizio LCD HD TV. However, I found the sound levels be a little frustrating. During parts of the movie with simple character dialog, I had to crank the volume up, but when any action sequences came up, I had to dial down the volume. My Apple TV is connected to the TV via HDMI cable, and I’m running audio straight through the TV, and not into a receiver. Perhaps that is the issue.
At any rate, those of you with an Apple TV should upgrade it right away if you haven’t already. And those of you curious about the Apple TV, if you have a desire to bring the content stored in your iTunes library on your Mac or PC into your living room or bedroom, it’s a great way to do it.
Maps On The iPod Touch
Although I didn’t agree with Apple charging for its major software update to the iPod touch — I went ahead and did it anyway. It included features and enhancements that I thought would be handy to have. The upgrade itself was super easy — iTunes pretty much handled it all.
One of the nice new features included Google Maps. But there was one part of how Google Maps functioned on the iPod touch that just mystified me. And I am calling upon all Gnomies for somebody to explain how it works.
Using local Wi-Fi access points, it is able to roughly approximate your location. Whoa. How is that possible? I know the basics of how GPS works (my BlackBerry 8310 has on-board GPS), I also know that the newer iPhone software allows for “faux-GPS” using cell phone tower triangulation. But how does the iPod touch determine approximate location using Wi-Fi access points? I’m guessing something involving IP addresses and ISPs. But how the heck would that even work (and work so quickly)? I know that law enforcement can track somebody’s computer by back-tracing their workstation’s (or router’s) public IP address through the ISP. But I imagine that being a far from instant process.
Somebody enlighten me, please!
Too Many Choices
Too many choices cause headaches rather than satisfaction. I admit one of my weaker areas is the inability to make decisions. Do I want to do this or that? Do I want this or that? Should I go to this? Should I get this or that?
Visit any restaurant and the menu typically contains too many choices. When I bought an MP3 player for my kid, I debated which color to get. Tennis shoes, tennis racquet, all-in-one printer, cochlear implant (small vs. regular), volleyball socks. These were all subjects of recent decisions.
My mom decided to get a digital camera for my older two kids as gifts. The oldest has an old camera of mine, but it takes faded photos every now and then — and she takes tons of photos. The SD30 wasn’t for them, so I did quick research (dreading it as I know I could easily spend hours on cameras). I found one and the price was right. Told Mom and left it at that.
Thankfully, another Web site confirmed I made the right decision. Had it the site contained poor reviews, I’d scramble and start the search again. This is exactly what happened when I almost bought an all-in-one printer.
I have a crowded small office. As an organized person, everything has its place. An all-in-one would give me breathing room as I could pass on my color printer and scanner to my oldest. Well, I did that and I have a little more room — and the fax remains since this new all-in-one was a minus one — no fax.
I’ve been reviewing Web sites stepping into the target market’s head as I work around each Web site. The problem with many is they provide too many choices. A site should have no more than one call to action on a page. The navigation — it’s as if the company is afraid to cut out items thinking the visitor would want them. They can’t miss what’s not there.
A good resource on this topic is Barry Schwartz’s The Paradox of Choice. Sadly it sits on my shelf unread as other books get first dibs.
Do we need so many choices?

© 1996-2006, Lockergnome LLC. ISSN: 1095-3965. All Rights Reserved. Please read our