Linspire 6.0 - Time To Reconsider?
- 2
- Add a Comment
- No Related Post
There are a lot of changes coming to the Linux world these days, perhaps the one not receiving as much fanfare as I would have expected is the release of Linspire 6.0. Now I realize that Freespire 2.0 is just around the corner and I am still mulling over my feelings over Linspire having made their deal with Microsoft over the alleged patent protection, despite the fact that I have still not seen ANY proof from Microsoft short of their claims.
With all of that said, I still support elements of what Linspire stands for and last time I checked, I am still considered an ‘insider’ with their behind the scenes access, be it nothing I can publicly share due to a loosely stated NDA agreement. Today I willfully am supporting them for one reason - the legitimacy here in the States for the Linux desktop. Even though many of the patents allegedly being violated according to Microsoft have yet to be proven publicly, there is no question that here in the States where IP laws are very strict, using Microsoft codecs and fonts with other Linux distributions and through Automatix is breaking US law - period. I hate it as much as the next guy, but this is a fact. There are IP claims that Microsoft have made public in the past, in addition to other patent holders.
I choose to continue running my Ubuntu desktop and supporting open source media formats on it such as OGG Vorbis and OGG Theroa. And because it will indeed be Linspire, not Canonical alone that will help the US user with the complex and painful issue over the legality of using restricted codecs and fonts on the Linux desktop, I am beginning to review their CNR appliance again.
Why? Because here soon, they will be making legal access (again, in the US) to restricted codecs and fonts for the end user. And here in the states, this is badly needed for anyone looking to seriously OEM these machines to anyone other than those willing to illegally download restricted codecs. Linspire and I have not always seen eye to eye. I have given this some thought, finding myself willing to give this a fresh look considering no one else has actually offered any solution short of the anti-patent approach seen with other distros which is ‘cute’, until you attempt to sell machines with these things installed here in the US of A. Linspire, I am willing to start fresh, I will be reviewing your distro here in the next few days. Watch for it in Google Blogs/News. From there, I will be reviewing your new CNR appliance on Ubuntu once it goes live as well.
[tags]Linux,Linspire[/tags]

2 Comments
Vince Andrews
July 19th, 2007
at 12:18am
Hi, Matt
May i say how refreshing your post is. I like honesty and consider your
review and opinions to be among the best non-biased on the net these
days.
I look forward to your future reviews and comments on the linspire and
microsoft issue.
As i live in britain, i do not have so many legislative problems.
I really do look forward to a time when the we are all equalised in the
world of linux and computing…
Looking forward is good, standing still is bad…
Vince
paul morris
July 19th, 2007
at 2:15pm
I always thought that innocent until proven guilty was the rule of law. Evidently MS feels otherwise as you pointed out they have not offered one iota of proof of their allegations and thus it’s hard for me to fathom why any Linux distro would cave in to their bullying tactics.By doing so, Linspire and others, are de facto admitting guilt.For the average person, it seems Linux is always embroiled in lawsuits and allegations of impropriety - speaking of which whatever happened to SCO’s suit?