User Accounts In Vista (Part II)

Posted by on Dec 7, 2006 | 3 Comments

In Part I of this series you learned how to create a user account in Vista. You’re next step is to become familiar with the different settings that can be configured through the properties window for a user account.

Every user account has a set of configurable properties. Right clicking on a user account within the Computer Management console brings up a dialog box with three tabs. From the properties window you can configure properties such as account options, group membership and user profiles.

To open the properties window for a user account:

  1. Right click Computer and select Manage.
  2. Select Local Users and Groups.
  3. Select Users.
  4. Right click the appropriate user account and click Properties.

The options available on each of the three tabs:

  • General: Used to change or configure the full name of the individual, the description of the user account and account options
  • Profile: This tab allows you to specify the path to a user’s profile as well as the location of logon scripts and home folders.
  • Member Of: Allows you to configure the groups of which the user account is a member.

Once you make the necessary changes to the user account, click OK. The change will be applied the next time the user logs on with that account.

[tags]Diana Huggins, Microsoft, Windows, Vista, user account[/tags]

  • craig

    i am the administrator, my wife and kids are user accounts, my wife is forced to change her password every month or so. I want to extend or change or remove the requirement for her to do this. I read user accounts in vista part II and it said
    To open the properties window for a user account:

    1. Right click Computer and select Manage.
    2. Select Local Users and Groups.

    I did #1 but users and groups” were not an available option after that.

    PLEASE help

  • http://twitter.com/bradhintze Brad Hintze

    Good article and you bring out some very important points about the safety/security of using browser extensions. However, these extensions are popular for a reason — they are extremely useful. The risks you mentioned are not problems caused by extensions, but by the development choices/architectures of individual developers building these extensions.

    Kynetx has built a platform for building browser apps that addresses the concerns you mentioned above. By providing developers with a platform for building browser applications that leverages web standards like OAuth, they can more easily create apps that safely and securely augment sites like Google+.

    The Kynetx architecture requires a single browser extension that can run multiple browser apps, reducing the overhead on the browser to truly customize the browsing experience.

    Also, Kynetx provides developers with intrinsic OAuth functions for Facebook encouraging developers to leverage the proper channels for handling user data. For instance, G+ to Facebook Share (http://apps.kynetx.com/installable_apps/4577-G+_to_Facebook_Share) uses standard Facebook OAuth to post into Facebook. The end user can revoke access at any point.

    Another feature of the Kynetx architecture is that applications can be globally disabled, so apps that violate user security/privacy can be immediately disabled, mitigating the risk to users.

    There is quite a list of applications available for Google+, you can see them all here: http://apps.kynetx.com/tags/Google+

    Also, these apps work on Firefox, Chrome and Safari.

    What is your reaction to this approach?

  • Anonymous

    It is right which you mention in your article about security. But what I think that which any new technology there are some risks also come. As there is two side of a coin as of any new invention there are some advantages and disadvantages both. So we can not avoid some wonderful features of google plus due to some security purpose and it depends upon person whether he want to use it or not.
    article submission