<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Digital Zen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen</link>
	<description>Geeky Stuff, Politics, Social Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Speed Up Firefox And Fix Glitches With An Easy Clean Install by bullet</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/03/09/speed-up-firefox-and-fix-glitches-with-an-easy-clean-install/#comment-4847</link>
		<dc:creator>bullet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=446#comment-4847</guid>
		<description>Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.  
After  freshly installing the Fox on my Windows machine, and "upgrading from a v.2 to v.3, suddenly a series of repeated crashes became so damn annoying I had to un-install the fresh "upgrade". 
Next, I had pure hell even finding on older v.2 to revert to, but when I finally did, and got it put back onto the machine. the crashes stopped and things worked as they should.

On my other machine, a Linux Ubuntu, I've learned to dread even an update, much less an entire "fresh" install of Firefox.  Over the preceding year I have altered many of the about:config settings and am quite happy with the results.  Until, that is, I get another of the Fox's famous "security"  updates.  Invariably, the "quick-crash" process begins all over again and I have to take the time to sort the problems the new update has created.  Finally, things get settled down and reliably working at about the time I receive another new and improved version of, or update to Firefox.
If you decide to dink with this fresh install idea, do yourself a few favors: back your extensions up with FEBE, sync your bookmarks to Foxmarks and set a restore point.   Take every step you can to  protect yourself before the fact and don't be terribly surprised,after the fact, when you find yourself wishing you had left well-enough alone.

&lt;em&gt;That's quite amazing, but of course with computers anything is possible.  I've been playing with Firefox since I became a beta tester on v. 0.2, and never had a problem like that.  The worst I've ever had came with one of the last releases of v. 2.x, when all of a sudden Gmail started using 50% of the CPU and locking up Fx.  That was corrected a couple of x's later, just before v. 3 was released, and I was never able to duplicate it on another machine...just my AMD dual-core at work.

I'm truly sorry that you ran into problems, but perhaps it is because of your tweaks to the about:config settings.  I've clean-installed on several different machines since I posted the article, with nary a problem, nor has my son-in-law had any with the several he's done.

As far as Ubuntu is concerned, I have a double-booted copy, but haven't opened it in months because when it updates it changes the boot order and I get tired of messing around in root correcting it.  Not ready for prime time -- at least my time.  But that's a story for another day....&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn&#8217;t.<br />
After  freshly installing the Fox on my Windows machine, and &#8220;upgrading from a v.2 to v.3, suddenly a series of repeated crashes became so damn annoying I had to un-install the fresh &#8220;upgrade&#8221;.<br />
Next, I had pure hell even finding on older v.2 to revert to, but when I finally did, and got it put back onto the machine. the crashes stopped and things worked as they should.</p>
<p>On my other machine, a Linux Ubuntu, I&#8217;ve learned to dread even an update, much less an entire &#8220;fresh&#8221; install of Firefox.  Over the preceding year I have altered many of the about:config settings and am quite happy with the results.  Until, that is, I get another of the Fox&#8217;s famous &#8220;security&#8221;  updates.  Invariably, the &#8220;quick-crash&#8221; process begins all over again and I have to take the time to sort the problems the new update has created.  Finally, things get settled down and reliably working at about the time I receive another new and improved version of, or update to Firefox.<br />
If you decide to dink with this fresh install idea, do yourself a few favors: back your extensions up with FEBE, sync your bookmarks to Foxmarks and set a restore point.   Take every step you can to  protect yourself before the fact and don&#8217;t be terribly surprised,after the fact, when you find yourself wishing you had left well-enough alone.</p>
<p><em>That&#8217;s quite amazing, but of course with computers anything is possible.  I&#8217;ve been playing with Firefox since I became a beta tester on v. 0.2, and never had a problem like that.  The worst I&#8217;ve ever had came with one of the last releases of v. 2.x, when all of a sudden Gmail started using 50% of the CPU and locking up Fx.  That was corrected a couple of x&#8217;s later, just before v. 3 was released, and I was never able to duplicate it on another machine&#8230;just my AMD dual-core at work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m truly sorry that you ran into problems, but perhaps it is because of your tweaks to the about:config settings.  I&#8217;ve clean-installed on several different machines since I posted the article, with nary a problem, nor has my son-in-law had any with the several he&#8217;s done.</p>
<p>As far as Ubuntu is concerned, I have a double-booted copy, but haven&#8217;t opened it in months because when it updates it changes the boot order and I get tired of messing around in root correcting it.  Not ready for prime time &#8212; at least my time.  But that&#8217;s a story for another day&#8230;.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Speed Up Firefox And Fix Glitches With An Easy Clean Install by Snowball TiVo ~ Windows Fanatics</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/03/09/speed-up-firefox-and-fix-glitches-with-an-easy-clean-install/#comment-4774</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowball TiVo ~ Windows Fanatics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=446#comment-4774</guid>
		<description>[...] You can speed up Firefox (and fix minor glitches) with a fresh install/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can speed up Firefox (and fix minor glitches) with a fresh install/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Planet Neptune Discovered, 9/23/1846 by sharnee</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2008/09/23/planet-neptune-discovered-9231846/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>sharnee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2008/09/23/planet-neptune-discovered-9231846/#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>Neptune is the eighth planett from the Sun.

Neptune was discovered on the 9/23/1846.


IM AM LEARNING ABOUT OUTER SPACE 

BY  Sharnee Brandley thank-you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neptune is the eighth planett from the Sun.</p>
<p>Neptune was discovered on the 9/23/1846.</p>
<p>IM AM LEARNING ABOUT OUTER SPACE </p>
<p>BY  Sharnee Brandley thank-you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comment For Our Buddies Over At The Linux Shoppe by tiyowan</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/03/02/a-comment-for-our-buddies-over-at-the-linux-shoppe/#comment-4749</link>
		<dc:creator>tiyowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=435#comment-4749</guid>
		<description>I agree with the points put forward in this article. 

1. Members of the Linux community often exhibit an elitist attitude which tends to put off new users.  

2. Almost all the distributions of Linux out there still need to make a significant amount of progress in user-friendliness, if Linux is to enter into mainstream usage.  

That being said, the current situation is definitely a lot better than the old days. 

With the increasing popularity of netbooks, it would be interesting to research the customer experiences of those who have bought the models which come preloaded with Ubuntu.

Re. #1, I think there are many Linux distributions out there whose goal is not to enter into the mainstream. Therefore, I think it would be unwise to expect their developers or communities to pay much attention to user-friendliness.

I personally dual-boot Ubuntu and Windows XP. I'm biased towards Ubuntu because it works well with (admittedly) some tweaking. 

I'm also satisfied in using Windows XP when I have to. In my case, Windows XP has been much better than Vista.

I think a lot of us in the open-source community get really worked up sometimes and miss the point entirely. 

As technical users, we sometimes forget how difficult it is for someone new to computers to get to grips with Linux.

Perhaps this is why some of the comments above immediately jump to making comparisons? :)

&lt;em&gt;No doubt you are correct.  Many people seem unable to understand that criticism, whether or not couched in terms that they consider respectful, may yet have some basis.  I was a bit snarky on purpose: I wanted to stir up a reaction.  Worked, too.  But it kept some folks from seeing the point.

Thanks for "getting it," and saying so.  ;)&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the points put forward in this article. </p>
<p>1. Members of the Linux community often exhibit an elitist attitude which tends to put off new users.  </p>
<p>2. Almost all the distributions of Linux out there still need to make a significant amount of progress in user-friendliness, if Linux is to enter into mainstream usage.  </p>
<p>That being said, the current situation is definitely a lot better than the old days. </p>
<p>With the increasing popularity of netbooks, it would be interesting to research the customer experiences of those who have bought the models which come preloaded with Ubuntu.</p>
<p>Re. #1, I think there are many Linux distributions out there whose goal is not to enter into the mainstream. Therefore, I think it would be unwise to expect their developers or communities to pay much attention to user-friendliness.</p>
<p>I personally dual-boot Ubuntu and Windows XP. I&#8217;m biased towards Ubuntu because it works well with (admittedly) some tweaking. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also satisfied in using Windows XP when I have to. In my case, Windows XP has been much better than Vista.</p>
<p>I think a lot of us in the open-source community get really worked up sometimes and miss the point entirely. </p>
<p>As technical users, we sometimes forget how difficult it is for someone new to computers to get to grips with Linux.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is why some of the comments above immediately jump to making comparisons? <img src='http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><em>No doubt you are correct.  Many people seem unable to understand that criticism, whether or not couched in terms that they consider respectful, may yet have some basis.  I was a bit snarky on purpose: I wanted to stir up a reaction.  Worked, too.  But it kept some folks from seeing the point.</p>
<p>Thanks for &#8220;getting it,&#8221; and saying so.  <img src='http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comment For Our Buddies Over At The Linux Shoppe by valencio</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/03/02/a-comment-for-our-buddies-over-at-the-linux-shoppe/#comment-4746</link>
		<dc:creator>valencio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=435#comment-4746</guid>
		<description>I started using ubuntu 8.10 and find it much easier to use than Windows Vista.

&lt;i&gt;All of the comments seem to miss what I said in the original post.  I did not say Ubuntu was harder to use than Vista.  I didn't even mention Vista.  Ubuntu kicks its butt -- except for all those Windows applications that don't run well or at all in WINE.  Nor did I say I had trouble using Ubuntu (or any other form of Linux, including the command line versions).  I said it was annoying.  I happen to prefer my streamlined version of XP, but that has nothing to do with what I wrote either, it has to do with some of the work I need to accomplish.  

What I DID say was that Linux's little quirks and geeky side-trips were annoying, and would put off the average user.  I think its share of the OS pie confirms that.

In my opinion, not even Ubuntu is ready for prime time.  It's still too geeky.  That's all I said.  That's all I meant.  End of story.  Last comment from me, unless someone comes up with something really interesting.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using ubuntu 8.10 and find it much easier to use than Windows Vista.</p>
<p><i>All of the comments seem to miss what I said in the original post.  I did not say Ubuntu was harder to use than Vista.  I didn&#8217;t even mention Vista.  Ubuntu kicks its butt &#8212; except for all those Windows applications that don&#8217;t run well or at all in WINE.  Nor did I say I had trouble using Ubuntu (or any other form of Linux, including the command line versions).  I said it was annoying.  I happen to prefer my streamlined version of XP, but that has nothing to do with what I wrote either, it has to do with some of the work I need to accomplish.  </p>
<p>What I DID say was that Linux&#8217;s little quirks and geeky side-trips were annoying, and would put off the average user.  I think its share of the OS pie confirms that.</p>
<p>In my opinion, not even Ubuntu is ready for prime time.  It&#8217;s still too geeky.  That&#8217;s all I said.  That&#8217;s all I meant.  End of story.  Last comment from me, unless someone comes up with something really interesting.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comment For Our Buddies Over At The Linux Shoppe by leftystrat</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/03/02/a-comment-for-our-buddies-over-at-the-linux-shoppe/#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>leftystrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=435#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu is too much trouble for you?
Vista will make your head explode then.

My parents and coworkers use EEE-Ubuntu daily and not a single one has any trouble with them.  I suspect some of them don't know it's linux.

&lt;em&gt;I said it was annoying; I didn't say it was "too much."  (And Vista was off my new machine within two hours of opening the box.  I have two more licensed copies of XP Pro on the shelf, too.  We'll see about W7.)

What I find annoying, a number of folks I know have found to be more than they wanted to deal with.  I have Ubuntu on two of my three PCs, but I mainly update it occasionally to find out if they've made major changes.  I'd like to love it, but... 

My original statement was general, referring to the "ready for prime time" qualities, and the likelihood of it being widely adopted.  I stand by what I said, and the adoption rate backs it up.  As for EEE Ubuntu and the myriad versions of Linux in general, the community can brag all they want about open source, and freedom, and blah, blah, blah.  When you have to shop around for an OS version you may be free, but you are also a geek.  The world at large is not, and doesn't want to be.

If there's a Unix-based OS of the future, it will come from someone who's more interested in usability than freedom.  Oh, wait.  There's the Mac....&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu is too much trouble for you?<br />
Vista will make your head explode then.</p>
<p>My parents and coworkers use EEE-Ubuntu daily and not a single one has any trouble with them.  I suspect some of them don&#8217;t know it&#8217;s linux.</p>
<p><em>I said it was annoying; I didn&#8217;t say it was &#8220;too much.&#8221;  (And Vista was off my new machine within two hours of opening the box.  I have two more licensed copies of XP Pro on the shelf, too.  We&#8217;ll see about W7.)</p>
<p>What I find annoying, a number of folks I know have found to be more than they wanted to deal with.  I have Ubuntu on two of my three PCs, but I mainly update it occasionally to find out if they&#8217;ve made major changes.  I&#8217;d like to love it, but&#8230; </p>
<p>My original statement was general, referring to the &#8220;ready for prime time&#8221; qualities, and the likelihood of it being widely adopted.  I stand by what I said, and the adoption rate backs it up.  As for EEE Ubuntu and the myriad versions of Linux in general, the community can brag all they want about open source, and freedom, and blah, blah, blah.  When you have to shop around for an OS version you may be free, but you are also a geek.  The world at large is not, and doesn&#8217;t want to be.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s a Unix-based OS of the future, it will come from someone who&#8217;s more interested in usability than freedom.  Oh, wait.  There&#8217;s the Mac&#8230;.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comment For Our Buddies Over At The Linux Shoppe by the oracle</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/03/02/a-comment-for-our-buddies-over-at-the-linux-shoppe/#comment-4740</link>
		<dc:creator>the oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=435#comment-4740</guid>
		<description>Just wondering how you managed to put up a comment without it being counted, or an icon to the left of it. I was looking through the dashboard, thinking we'd undergone a revision change, but no.  

So, how?

&lt;em&gt;Edited the original, like this.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering how you managed to put up a comment without it being counted, or an icon to the left of it. I was looking through the dashboard, thinking we&#8217;d undergone a revision change, but no.  </p>
<p>So, how?</p>
<p><em>Edited the original, like this.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comment For Our Buddies Over At The Linux Shoppe by the oracle</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/03/02/a-comment-for-our-buddies-over-at-the-linux-shoppe/#comment-4739</link>
		<dc:creator>the oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=435#comment-4739</guid>
		<description>Think about how long it took for Microsoft to get the operating system 'dumbed down' enough that the blathering idiots would use it - about 14 years (I use the DOS 1.0 to Windows 95 time frame). Microsoft has thousands of people dedicated 40+ hours per week working on their software.

Linux may take a while longer, because the developers are fewer, their hours are fewer, and their standards are higher.

I also think that they expect the users to meet them half way, because they aren't kowtowing to the LCD.

&lt;i&gt;When it comes to improving on Microsoft's mistakes, they're slipping on the one thing that they could use as a selling point.  Make it easier.  And I'm talking about writing cogent, useful help files and some simple GUIs, not inventing cold fusion.

If the Linux developers expect the users to meet them halfway, they don't REALLY want to be top dogs in the fight.  You either build a product that sells, or you just talk about selling.  I'm not saying Linux isn't better than Windows; I'm saying it's no easier to use at present, so why should people bother to switch?  The vast majority of people don't CARE what's under the hood, and they hate change.  The elitist attitude is &lt;/i&gt;precisely&lt;i&gt; what needs to go.&lt;/i&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about how long it took for Microsoft to get the operating system &#8216;dumbed down&#8217; enough that the blathering idiots would use it - about 14 years (I use the DOS 1.0 to Windows 95 time frame). Microsoft has thousands of people dedicated 40+ hours per week working on their software.</p>
<p>Linux may take a while longer, because the developers are fewer, their hours are fewer, and their standards are higher.</p>
<p>I also think that they expect the users to meet them half way, because they aren&#8217;t kowtowing to the LCD.</p>
<p><i>When it comes to improving on Microsoft&#8217;s mistakes, they&#8217;re slipping on the one thing that they could use as a selling point.  Make it easier.  And I&#8217;m talking about writing cogent, useful help files and some simple GUIs, not inventing cold fusion.</p>
<p>If the Linux developers expect the users to meet them halfway, they don&#8217;t REALLY want to be top dogs in the fight.  You either build a product that sells, or you just talk about selling.  I&#8217;m not saying Linux isn&#8217;t better than Windows; I&#8217;m saying it&#8217;s no easier to use at present, so why should people bother to switch?  The vast majority of people don&#8217;t CARE what&#8217;s under the hood, and they hate change.  The elitist attitude is </i>precisely<i> what needs to go.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A BlackBerry Secure Enough For Obama? by Justin Bortnick</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/22/a-blackberry-secure-enough-for-obama/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Bortnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/22/a-blackberry-secure-enough-for-obama/#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>Check this out, this software can help Obama keep his blackberry.

Advanced Compliance Tool Keeps President Connected while satisfying Secret Service request to limit and control the recipients list and Keeps Him Covered on Presidential Records Act

http://www.onsettechnology.com/highlights</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out, this software can help Obama keep his blackberry.</p>
<p>Advanced Compliance Tool Keeps President Connected while satisfying Secret Service request to limit and control the recipients list and Keeps Him Covered on Presidential Records Act</p>
<p><a href="http://www.onsettechnology.com/highlights" rel="nofollow">http://www.onsettechnology.com/highlights</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tesla Motors to supply batteries, components for electric Smart Car by SciNewsBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/14/tesla-motors-announces-agreement-to-supply-batteries-components-for-electric-smart-ca/#comment-4470</link>
		<dc:creator>SciNewsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=416#comment-4470</guid>
		<description>With the new SMART car gaining popularity, some other auto manufacturers are adapting their cars to compete. Here  are some examples: They are the Smorche, the Smorvette and the Smamborghini. I like the Smamborghini. You can see then here. &lt;a href="http://scinewsblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/smart-car-competition.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Smart car competition&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the new SMART car gaining popularity, some other auto manufacturers are adapting their cars to compete. Here  are some examples: They are the Smorche, the Smorvette and the Smamborghini. I like the Smamborghini. You can see then here. <a href="http://scinewsblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/smart-car-competition.html" rel="nofollow">Smart car competition</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Image Metrics&#8217; New Animation Technology Sucks by RSS Digest - #13 - CES,Windows 7, and more</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/10/image-metrics-new-animation-technology-sucks/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>RSS Digest - #13 - CES,Windows 7, and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/?p=410#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>[...] Tethering: AT&#38;T May Shock Us All and Charge $10 Introducing Tweetbacks Plugin for Wordpress Image Metrics’ New Animation Technology Sucks Hands on: Google leaps forward with Chrome 2.0 dev. preview Full Video Of The Palm Pre Keynote Now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tethering: AT&amp;T May Shock Us All and Charge $10 Introducing Tweetbacks Plugin for Wordpress Image Metrics’ New Animation Technology Sucks Hands on: Google leaps forward with Chrome 2.0 dev. preview Full Video Of The Palm Pre Keynote Now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For BlackBerry, Obama’s Devotion Is Priceless by Going Beyond TV &#124; Chris Pirillo</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/09/for-blackberry-obama%e2%80%99s-devotion-is-priceless/#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>Going Beyond TV &#124; Chris Pirillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/09/for-blackberry-obama%e2%80%99s-devotion-is-priceless/#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>[...] For BlackBerry, Obama&#8217;s devotion is priceless. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For BlackBerry, Obama&#8217;s devotion is priceless. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quote of the Week (I Think): by Robert Glen Fogarty</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/08/quote-of-the-week-i-think/#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Glen Fogarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/08/quote-of-the-week-i-think/#comment-4431</guid>
		<description>That Larry Flynt. He's always been pretty good at pointing out the ludicrous. I think that (as his prankster heart probably does) a lot of people will take this as a serious plea to the powers that be for a real handout instead of a wink to his fellow taxpayers that the bailout recipients are, but for the veneer of "respected" American institutions, no more deserving of being bailed out than anyone else who suffers in the current economy -- pornographers included.

I seem to remember reading another excerpt from the letter quoted above that said the adult industry's actually not suffering very much. Maybe the pornographers should be in charge of the national purse strings since they seem to know how to manage money and thrive better than the so-called "experts" we're bailing out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Larry Flynt. He&#8217;s always been pretty good at pointing out the ludicrous. I think that (as his prankster heart probably does) a lot of people will take this as a serious plea to the powers that be for a real handout instead of a wink to his fellow taxpayers that the bailout recipients are, but for the veneer of &#8220;respected&#8221; American institutions, no more deserving of being bailed out than anyone else who suffers in the current economy &#8212; pornographers included.</p>
<p>I seem to remember reading another excerpt from the letter quoted above that said the adult industry&#8217;s actually not suffering very much. Maybe the pornographers should be in charge of the national purse strings since they seem to know how to manage money and thrive better than the so-called &#8220;experts&#8221; we&#8217;re bailing out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quote of the Week (I Think): by Lumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/08/quote-of-the-week-i-think/#comment-4430</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/08/quote-of-the-week-i-think/#comment-4430</guid>
		<description>Oh I don't like Mr. Flynt but I do like what he did politically for freedom of speech.  Nice to see he is exercising to show where his mind is and and what, if anything, is in it.  I completely forgot about the porn industry pulling us out of the great depression.

Personally, I think we all need to cure are depression with a healthy does of work ethic and long term thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I don&#8217;t like Mr. Flynt but I do like what he did politically for freedom of speech.  Nice to see he is exercising to show where his mind is and and what, if anything, is in it.  I completely forgot about the porn industry pulling us out of the great depression.</p>
<p>Personally, I think we all need to cure are depression with a healthy does of work ethic and long term thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who The Hell Writes Wikipedia, Anyway? by Wikipedia : the swarm and the intelligent &#171; Mixotricha</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/03/who-the-hell-writes-wikipedia-anyway/#comment-4413</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia : the swarm and the intelligent &#171; Mixotricha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/03/who-the-hell-writes-wikipedia-anyway/#comment-4413</guid>
		<description>[...] Who The Hell Writes Wikipedia, Anyway? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who The Hell Writes Wikipedia, Anyway? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who The Hell Writes Wikipedia, Anyway? by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/03/who-the-hell-writes-wikipedia-anyway/#comment-4412</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/03/who-the-hell-writes-wikipedia-anyway/#comment-4412</guid>
		<description>Wow, that many?  How did you come up with your figures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that many?  How did you come up with your figures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who The Hell Writes Wikipedia, Anyway? by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/03/who-the-hell-writes-wikipedia-anyway/#comment-4411</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2009/01/03/who-the-hell-writes-wikipedia-anyway/#comment-4411</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia being a open database letting anyone write whatever they want. Since it's growth has expanded the past 2 years I guess it would have a lot of writers. I would estimate 1/10 out of internet users have or do edit wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia being a open database letting anyone write whatever they want. Since it&#8217;s growth has expanded the past 2 years I guess it would have a lot of writers. I would estimate 1/10 out of internet users have or do edit wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Must Obama Say Goodbye to His BlackBerry? by Benjamin Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2008/11/15/must-obama-say-goodbye-to-his-blackberry/#comment-3782</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2008/11/15/must-obama-say-goodbye-to-his-blackberry/#comment-3782</guid>
		<description>The similar issues apply in state government.  On account of Open Records Acts, state governments are wise to insist that employees (including governors) route &lt;a href="http://legal-beagle.typepad.com/wrights_legal_beagle/2008/08/local-government-e-mail-and-the-freedom-of-information-act.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;all business e-mail through a central e-mail archive&lt;/a&gt; and to encourage employees to take all personal e-mail to personal accounts.  --Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The similar issues apply in state government.  On account of Open Records Acts, state governments are wise to insist that employees (including governors) route <a href="http://legal-beagle.typepad.com/wrights_legal_beagle/2008/08/local-government-e-mail-and-the-freedom-of-information-act.html" rel="nofollow">all business e-mail through a central e-mail archive</a> and to encourage employees to take all personal e-mail to personal accounts.  &#8211;Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Must Obama Say Goodbye to His BlackBerry? by Sheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2008/11/15/must-obama-say-goodbye-to-his-blackberry/#comment-3781</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2008/11/15/must-obama-say-goodbye-to-his-blackberry/#comment-3781</guid>
		<description>Read a tongue-in-cheek fantasy letter to the President-Elect on how to give up his thumbing addiction at www.justmypointofview.wordpress.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read a tongue-in-cheek fantasy letter to the President-Elect on how to give up his thumbing addiction at <a href="http://www.justmypointofview.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.justmypointofview.wordpress.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make-Believe Maverick by johhnyx</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2008/10/06/make-believe-maverick/#comment-2263</link>
		<dc:creator>johhnyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/digitalzen/2008/10/06/make-believe-maverick/#comment-2263</guid>
		<description>You don't really expect us to believe that you think the Rolling Stone article is truthful, accurate, or unbiased, do you?
Jann and RS have already endorsed Obama, and write nothing but glowing puff pieces about him.  I'm not a supporter of McCain, but come on.  Obama has no substance behind him, and this is really the emperor with no clothes.  No major legislation. No real details about what he did with "community organizing".  He said he's "fought for people"  What the hell does that exactly mean?

It's funny how the media presents everything about the McCain campaign as "negative".  Yet, when I saw the Spanish-language video where McCain was presented as calling Latinos "el stupido", none of that stuck to Obama supporters nor him.  "Oh, he's not responsible for everything".  Yet, McCain is somehow responsible for what is yelled out at rallies!  (and the Secret Service doubts these remarks were actually made)

I never supported McCain, but I doubt very much that he's the self-serving clown the RS article proclaims.  Obama seems to have done pretty well for himself, too, and his kids go to some nice private schools too.  Why live in a million dollar house, when you can "share the wealth" and give some of that money back to the boyz in the hood, who got you elected?
&lt;em&gt;
I expect you to take from it whatever you take from it, and clearly something about it gave you an urge to spout buzzwords and talking points, just like McCain. 

The libel laws in this country are quite specific, and publication of attributed remarks in a national magazine is quite different, legally, from the veiled innuendo and unspecific commentary of a swift boat or other campaign tactic.  Yes, I believe them, and you should too.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t really expect us to believe that you think the Rolling Stone article is truthful, accurate, or unbiased, do you?<br />
Jann and RS have already endorsed Obama, and write nothing but glowing puff pieces about him.  I&#8217;m not a supporter of McCain, but come on.  Obama has no substance behind him, and this is really the emperor with no clothes.  No major legislation. No real details about what he did with &#8220;community organizing&#8221;.  He said he&#8217;s &#8220;fought for people&#8221;  What the hell does that exactly mean?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny how the media presents everything about the McCain campaign as &#8220;negative&#8221;.  Yet, when I saw the Spanish-language video where McCain was presented as calling Latinos &#8220;el stupido&#8221;, none of that stuck to Obama supporters nor him.  &#8220;Oh, he&#8217;s not responsible for everything&#8221;.  Yet, McCain is somehow responsible for what is yelled out at rallies!  (and the Secret Service doubts these remarks were actually made)</p>
<p>I never supported McCain, but I doubt very much that he&#8217;s the self-serving clown the RS article proclaims.  Obama seems to have done pretty well for himself, too, and his kids go to some nice private schools too.  Why live in a million dollar house, when you can &#8220;share the wealth&#8221; and give some of that money back to the boyz in the hood, who got you elected?<br />
<em><br />
I expect you to take from it whatever you take from it, and clearly something about it gave you an urge to spout buzzwords and talking points, just like McCain. </p>
<p>The libel laws in this country are quite specific, and publication of attributed remarks in a national magazine is quite different, legally, from the veiled innuendo and unspecific commentary of a swift boat or other campaign tactic.  Yes, I believe them, and you should too.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
