The recent commercials from Apple illustrating its newest toy, Siri, make me unsure if I want to laugh or cry. To laugh, because I am sure that the concept behind these commercials is to enlighten us as to the many facets of advice Siri can provide, even going as far as showing us its ability to be humorous. Unfortunately, these same commercials also make me want to cry since they make us aware of just how out of touch we are becoming with our fellow man. You see this, over and over again, as commercials tout the ever-growing relationship that man is forging with the machines that they rely on and that could someday remove the need for human contact. Just think of it: a machine that interacts with you on an almost conversational level. Will this provide another excuse for the introverted among us who already struggle with interpersonal relationships to avoid dealing with the real world? Though I seriously doubt that this is Apple’s intent, it is still something that we should ponder in light of our children’s obvious reliance on technology at home, at school, and even at church.
While much of this technology is beneficial and offers a much more reliable means of performing tasks that were previously time consuming and mundane — such as answering the phone — I wonder about the wisdom of turning yet more control over to a computer. To date, Apple has been using actors and actresses to tout the many benefits and words of enlightenment that Siri is able to provide to the masses, but it is possible that at some point the machine will be making its own bid for dominance instead of leaving it in the hands of humans. I wonder if that means that we humans will stop contemplating the complex issues that surround us.
One such not-so-complex issue was featured in one of the Apple iPhone 4S commercials where actress Zooey Deschanel asks her iPhone via Siri if it is raining. The unfortunate fact is that she is standing near a window that is being pelted with and streaked by raindrops. After this inane question, she then looks around what appears to be the living room and instructs Siri to remind her, the next day, to clean up the obvious jumbled assortment of materials lying around. In other words, if one cannot see that it is raining outside or compute that a mess needs to be cleaned up, I would venture a guess that this is the type of person who needs to pay particular attention to the instructions for using a seat belt that are given when flying.
In yet another commercial, actor Samuel L. Jackson is talking to his Apple iPhone 4S when he inquires how many ounces there are in a cup. Surely you jest! This type of information is taught in grade school and should be known by most everyone in the United States where it is the general standard for measurement. (I do realize that a person born and educated elsewhere may have need of assistance in this department.) The next bit of assistance occurs when the actor tells Siri to cancel his scheduled golf game. Here one is to assume that Siri is going to call the golf course, his caddy, and other players to notify them of the cancellation. If Siri is truly able to perform all of these tasks without dropping the ball somewhere, it would be great. However, from what I have been reading about the abilities of Siri, I would be highly doubtful that this automated system would be able to accomplish all of this — no matter how smart we are told that it is.
In yet another commercial, Apple employs the talents of actor John Malkovich. I find this particular commercial both humorous and scary. I say this because the commercial starts with the actor uttering the single word “life.” To this word, Siri responds with a rather long explanation concluding how well we should treat people. This part becomes kind of scary when we consider that we are basically accepting the idea that a machine is smarter than we are, when in actuality it is merely parroting the interpretation of someone else’s thoughts. My interpretation of what l believe life is does not come close to what Siri provides.
So while I have shown how Siri appears to be the next step in machine versus human interaction, it is not only the use of Siri that I believe is isolating us from human contact. This is just another building block on top of social networking sites like Facebook that allow us to share our daily activities with people we have never met. I know I had to trim down my friends list because I was being overwhelmed with underwhelming information from people I didn’t even know. Couple this with our newfound ability to communicate with one another using text messages and we find that we no longer need to hear the other person’s voice to inquire how their life is going on planet Earth.
Unfortunately, our alienation from human contact and our reliance on features such as what Siri offers could further complicate our lives instead of making them simpler. This could begin with our accepting what Apple is trying to sell — that Siri is like a friend. I can see our children buying into this, but I can also see how it would cause them to lose the ability to separate fact from fiction. The fact is that Siri is a just powered by a microchip that employs a large database of information that has been preprogrammed to answer a variety of questions to which you may or may not know the answer. Again, getting answers is great, but what about the many individuals out there who live by themselves and may choose to actually make Siri their friend and confidant? How lonely that life would be. Think about it: Siri isn’t going to go out for pizza with you. In turn, this makes me wonder what Freud would think of all of this if he were still alive. Would he be using Siri, posting his entire life’s activities on Facebook, and texting his associates for advice on those hard to solve cases? Would Dr. Freud consider all of this normal and all of us who use this technology for communication normal as well?
But what is normal?
Comments, as always, are welcome.
CC licensed Flickr photo above shared by ppalmer21




This article reflects the fallacy of anthropomorphism and technology doesn’t do anything unless you make a conscious decision to use or apply it. One can become obsessive about any technology, whether it’s old tech (books) or new tech (iPhone with Siri) but the technology isn’t at fault. Unfortunately when it comes to new technology, there’s a knee-jerk tendency to fear or loathe it because it either displaces old technology (which some don’t realize is technology) or there’s an irrational fear of technology AKA technophobia. Due to the absurd premise of the author’s article, I’d say technophobia is the root cause. If one is severely introverted, the Internet can actually act as a bridge to allow such a person virtual contact as opposed to pre-Internet when that introverted person would have no contact. Of course the key is what that person chooses; the technology doesn’t choose for them.
when it comes to me I think as another commenter said named ” markbyrn” that the internet does actually provide a bride for people to meet which otherwise would have never happened due to someone being very introverted. I personally am very introverted I never leave the house and all my contact is involved only by people that I have meet online. So i dont think technology isolates people because of the fact that like “markbyrn” said its a choice in a way and I say in a way because I became an introverted person because my mother always allowed me to do nothing but play video games sense about age 3 and when I got a computer that introverted nature carried over to young adult hood and now adult hood aswell but sense I am an adult now and not a child it is now a choice that originated from child hood. Although whenever I am on the college campus and I am not in my home state for some reason that introverted nature becomes second nature I naturally dont wanna be around technology when I am not home. I dont know why that is I have recently completed my first semester at a new school and I never wanted to be home although 99.9% of the time I always stay in my room learning photoshop or music and doing nothing but things that involve my computer or xbox. I also dont think technology isolates us is because look at facebook many people who use it will be on it for days at a time and never leave the house and thats there social communication and it pleases that and also that is a substitute for physical communication. There are also many users who will be engaging in physical communication do to facebook as well and I am excluding strangers meeting up because of facebook I am only considering people who already knew each other prior to facebook and facebook then becomes a medium for those individuals meeting up in the near future.
Good food for thought. I always wondered how does one sync their daily routine given so much tech stuff around us!!!! The Authors caught on to my thoughts. Great book, not to be missed.
Depends HOW IT’s used. One hand it can, by giving us TOO Much data. It can ALSO Allow us to talk 2 and shair with people we wouldn’t/couldn’t in other ways