Riskiest Product From Microsoft Will Be The Next Version Of Windows

Posted by on Oct 23, 2010 | 5 Comments

During a Gartner symposium which was held in Orlando, a free word association between a Gartner spokesperson and Steve Ballmer from Microsoft, brought a surprising answer. Steve Ballmer was asked what was his companies most riskiest undertaking and he responded that it was the next version of Windows. Interesting. I would have thought it would have been their new phone, or Bing or their cloud offerings. So why would it be Windows?

According to some statements and comments in a recent article, here are some reasons why:

OK. This could be more of the hype we heard rumored earlier this year when the “Windows vNext” rumors began going around. There were reports that the next release of Windows — which most of us out here call Windows 8 — would be revolutionary, not evolutionary.

But when we saw the leaked Windows 8 slide deck which looked to be from Microsoft (dated April 2010), the supposed early feature set concepts for Windows 8 looked solid, but weren’t anything I’d call “risky.” Fast startup, facial recognition as a security option, better support for slates, a possible app store — all good, but not amazing. The one feature on the list that might be considered remotely risky (mostly in terms of the ability of Microsoft to deliver it)? Push-button reset, which allegedly would reinstall Windows while maintaining all of your personal files, applications and settings.

I’ve heard from some tipsters that Windows 8 would include a very different kind of file system. I’m not sure what that would entail. I’m doubtful we’re talking about anything like the old WinFS concept (as this was, for the most part, tabled before the launch of Windows Vista).

So why did Ballmer characterize Windows 8 as “risky”? I’m left scratching my head. Could he have meant risky because of the way it will or won’t compete with other coming PC operating systems like ChromeOS, Mac OS X Lion? Or risky because of the adoption by more customers of the cloud? Could Windows 8 and Windows vNext actually be two different things? Or was Ballmer simply trying to deflect the question and provide an answer that would keep the scrutiny off the company’s newly launched products in mobile and gaming?

Here is my take on the future of Windows. We are going to be presented with alternative operating systems, mainly Google Chromium OS, that could provide us with an opportunity to shed ourselves from being shackled to Windows. This opportunity could allow us to use free applications provided by Google and also to store our stuff in the clouds.

What do you believe the future will hold for Windows?

Comments welcome.

Source – ZDNet

  • Pingback: iGURU NET - Riskiest Product From Microsoft Will Be The Next Version Of Windows

  • james engstrom

    Windows bane is that will be competing against itself; if Windows 7 continues to be successful, there will be tremendous resistance to a new upgrade, but if Windows 7 fails, the competition will move in!

    Microsoft’s only hope is a Sunami: To gamble on something big, bold, and new–or to reorganize and dump the PC, This is the XP dilemma in spades

  • http://www.bytehead.org/blog/ Bryan Price

    One of the things that Microsoft needs to work on is making Windows (and other applications) much more thread safe. I’ve been running four cores for two years now. It’s not hard to believe that higher end machines are going to have 6, 8, 12, even 48 (ore more) cores by the time that Windows 8 comes out. And I’ve already seen where one core getting maxed out drives the whole computer experience to a grinding halt. Getting the I/O to be a bit more asynchronous would also help, I had it when CPU is > 1%, but again, things are grinding because the hard drive seems to be the issue now.

    The UI needs to be made so that other ways of input can be added easily, whether it be a separate touch pad, touch screen, voice command, joy stick, breath tube, brain scan or whatever is the next great thing to come along. And it needs to feel like it hasn’t just been tacked on.

    Cloud APIs? I’m not sure we need separate cloud APIs, why should they look any different than any other file system, local or network?

    As far as Chromium OS, if everything you do is in the cloud, that might work. But as soon as you step off the cloud train, I see real troubles. Security issues are still going to be a big byte, even if you stay in the cloud. Who’s going to write all those drivers? Linux might have finally solved the issue of handling WiFi devices, although it was a ridiculous situation a few years ago when installing Windows 2000 and XP worked just off the CD, while I was forced to download the source to my specific card, then get the development system set up so I could compile the source that I had, and then to have the HOW-TO leave me hanging on where to put the resultant file and/or configuration file to where the system would actually work with it. With SATA 6.0GB, USB 3.0 and PCIexpress 3.0 and who knows what else in the near future, I see a rough time for getting a new OS out there.

    • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/ Ron Schenone

      Thanks Bryan your sharing your thoughts. It will be interesting to see what happens.
      Regards, Ron

  • james engstrom

    In response to Bryan: Your ideas are well thought out, but to incorporate them into Windows, Microsoft should emulate Linux and go the route of periodic upgrades (versions) rather than SP’s.

    They should work on solving one problem at a time: evolve rather than revolve! Could a financial model be created that would accommodate this change? Or is Closed Source the barrier.`