Who Is The Real Terrorist? Mix-Up On Facebook Profile Demonstrates Hazards Of Web Journalism

Posted by on May 5, 2010 | 9 Comments

In an effort to find out more information about the alleged terrorist who was recently arrested for the attempted bombing in Times Square,  journalists got the wrong profile of another person named Faisal Shahzad on Facebook. Once the error was brought to the attention of the Web site that published the information, it was pulled and the information removed. But what is disturbing about the incident is not the mistake itself, but that another person could be labeled as a terrorist and the resulting harm it could cause.

In a day and age where digital information is acquired by anyone who has access to social networking sites, what responsibility do journalists and bloggers have to confirm they have the right person? A recent article also states:

But Facebook journalism is a tricky science, and it almost certainly should never involve the publication of photographs of a person whom you think might be an alleged terrorist, and then again, might just be a normal dude. That’s the kind of thing that can put someone in danger.

This I believe is the bottom line, that the wrong person could be put in danger. I am sure that there are those who troll the Internet looking for any information that could identify someone who may not share their views. Though social networking sites go to great care to protect the identity of those who participate on the site, sometimes it is the users themselves that post too much private information concerning themselves and their families.

I recently did an article [read it here] in which a recent survey shows that people still continue to provide private information on the Internet.

What do you think?

Comments welcome.

Source

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/theoracle/ the oracle

    I’m saying this in jest, but there is a certain amount of sincere thought about it.

    First, perhaps when people from the Middle East come over here, they should think about the film Alien Nation, and pick out names that are more Americanized (i.e. Sam Francisco).

    Second, if this does not show the evils of Facebook, I don’t know what does.

    Third, anyone looking for terrorists on Facebook is looking in a tertiary place, and should be checking the more important places for credible information.

  • Pingback: My Social Media for May 5th « ☺ | LockerGnome.net Lifestream

  • Pingback: Love is in the Air for Apple Fans ~ Chris Pirillo

  • Pingback: Love is in the Air for Apple Fans

  • Kevin

    God forbid “John Smith” is ever arrested in this manner…

  • Paul Bennett

    The only reason why people are only using Facebook and why Facebook is the biggest is because people don’t seem to remember that the other social networking sites exist.

  • http://www.twitter.com/MacSmiley MacSmiley

    I would debate the statement that social networks are doing their best to protect the identity of their uses. Facebook is merely leading the charge.

    I would be interested to see if the poor guy whose photo’s been plastered around the Internet sues the one responsible… Facebook.

  • YOGESH PAWAR

    Terrorists won’t leave any thing

  • Roy

    The standard of ‘web journalism’ is extremely poor. Most of the so-called journalists don’t seem to have any problem distorting the truth of lying outright.
    While the internet has ‘democratised’ the news, it has really opened the doors to every whack-job who has enough money to own a computer.
    Journalists (real ones) go to college for a couple of years to learn their craft. I’m sure most of these news sources represent no education at all.
    Most mainstream news sources work hard to verify their sources. Those are the sources we should use.
    The reader should beware when the ‘alternative’ sources claim that the mainstream news sources are controlled by corporations, governments, or (god help us) the jews. If you want to see one study that looks at this, check out the Kent Royal Commission. This was an inquiry into mass ownership of media, and/or corporate influence on the media. While it could happen, it DOESN’T happen very often. I suppose the exception is Fox news. Those guys have no scruples at all.