Does Using Adblocking Hurt Those Sites You Like To Visit?

Posted by on Mar 8, 2010 | 7 Comments

This past weekend I read an article from ARS Technica by Ken Fisher, in which he describes why adblocking hurts the web sites that you love to visit. He first explained that many of the people who surf the Internet and visit sites they enjoy, did not know that using adblocking hurt the web site itself. He explained that there is a misconception that if people visit a site and do not click on ads, that using an adblocker should have no monetary affect  on the site. But the authors stated this:

Most sites, at least sites the size of ours, are paid on a per view basis. If you have an ad blocker running, and you load 10 pages on the site, you consume resources from us (bandwidth being only one of them), but provide us with no revenue. Because we are a technology site, we have a very large base of ad blockers. Imagine running a restaurant where 40% of the people who came and ate didn’t pay. In a way, that’s what ad blocking is doing to us. Just like a restaurant, we have to pay to staff, we have to pay for resources, and we have to pay when people consume those resources. The difference, of course, is that our visitors don’t pay us directly but indirectly by viewing advertising.

He also stated this:

My argument is simple: blocking ads can be devastating to the sites you love. I am not making an argument that blocking ads is a form of stealing, or is immoral, or unethical, or makes someone the son of the devil. It can result in people losing their jobs, it can result in less content on any given site, and it definitely can affect the quality of content. It can also put sites into a real advertising death spin. As ad revenues go down, many sites are lured into running advertising of a truly questionable nature.

The bottom line is that adblocking does have an affect on web sites, especially the web sites you enjoy visiting. But what was also presented was an experiment that ARS Technica tried, in which the company blocked out the entire content of their site for those who used adblockers. The experiment worked very well, but the results were mixed. The assumption was that people who used adblockers were doing so to stop a web site from making money. But that was not the case, since many people were not aware that this was the result of blocking ads on their favorite sites.

But for those of you who use the popular adblocking program called Adblock Plus which is a Firefox add-on, you can help your favorite site by a simple mouse clock. In the program drop down menu, and when you are on your favorite site, just click to disable adblocking on that site, or any sites you enjoy visiting.

Comments welcome.

Source

  • Flying dutchman

    Ars technica is not blocked, spam sites/IPs are blocked. I keep it that way because of bad experiences in the past.

    I don’t want flash movies starting in the middle of reading, sometimes with a lot of noise or blocking text with animations to get my attention. I don’t want to look through open tabs to find out where a flash movie started. I do not want pop-ups or pop-unders, malicious code (attempt three times via embedded browser exploit code in banners on legitimate sites), I don’t like personalized advertisements following me around and I do not like white banners that register a click while I thought I was clicking on empty space to regain mouse focus. I am not interested in ‘you are the 999999th visitor’ lies, fake Yes/Cancel dialog boxes, popups in the left bottom as if you have MSN running and some hooker in your contact lists, neither do I like crippled loading times because spam.com seems to experience some web traffic problems. I also don’t like a temporary freezing OS because of bad code and other annoying stuff.

    It’s not that these things happen constantly but it happens too much. I have nothing against non intrusive advertisements like text links and (still) images and I have nothing against people in advertisement business or website owners trying to make a living.

  • Pingback: My Social Media for March 8th « ☺ | LockerGnome.net Lifestream

  • Ryan Farmer

    So I have to endure Buzzing Mosquito, and Shoot The Duck ads that might inject malware so he can make a click penny? No thanks.

    Their greed sealed the ad blocking deal for me.

    Penis pill pop-ups/unders anyone?

  • mhz

    As consumers…no, wait… as human beings we have the right, even the responsibility, to control what information we absorb with our eyes and ears.

    Ads are seldom relevant, and frequently a nuisance. Therefore we block them. If sites start blocking me out, I’ll just look for alternate sites.

    When Google eventually decides that anyone using its services must stop showing content to ad blocking clients, I’ll take that as a sign that I need to be spending more time working in the yard, or the community.

    I don’t think that any human being should be forced to watch advertisements against their will. It’s like torture.

  • me

    1st off, reviving this topic.
    Secondly, websites should start looking for better ways of securing their income.
    -Google Television adverts for more info

  • TearGod

    I can honestly say that I really dont care enough about any site in particular enough for me to turn off my ad blocker. I will forever use my ad blocker as long as it is around.

  • http://n/a james

    the internet was created to share information freely.

    cash generating sites, e.g. porn sites, get their contents ripped and uploaded to torrent sites or megaupload or rapidshare.

    in the end, the internet will hold true to its nature. a big free library.