Google Doesn’t Want This Buzz – Aims To Fix Problems

Posted by on Feb 12, 2010 | 5 Comments

After a blogger complained that some of her private stuff was given to her ex-husband, Google has announced fixes for the flaws discovered in Buzz.  Google has responded to the complaints that brought to lite product flaws of:

1) People you block in Buzz still appear as following you in Reader. The spokesperson says, “This is a bug, and we’re working to fix it. Provided that your shared items are protected, only the people you’ve explicitly allowed to see them can do so — regardless of who appears to be following you in Reader.”

2) No ability to block people from Reader. The spokesperson says, “Until now, there has not been functionality to block people from following you in Google Reader. We’re adding this to the Reader interface.”

Once Google was made aware of the issues the company took immediate steps to plug the holes in their product. In a statement the search giant proposed the following steps were being taken:

1) If you block people in Buzz, they still show up as following you in Reader. This is a bug, and we’re working to fix it. Provided that your Google Reader shared items are protected, only the people you’ve explicitly allowed to see them can do so — regardless of who appears to be following you in Reader.

2) Until now, there has not been functionality to block people from following you in Google Reader. We’re adding this to the Reader interface.

We are making these two changes as fast as possible and we’ll get them live in the next few days.

It will be interesting to see if this fixes are enough to fix the problems which initiated the complaints in the first place. In all fairness, Google also stated that some of the complaint was just a misunderstanding by the blogger on how the system functioned.

The is also another option that should be available as well. The option to completely opt out of Buzz.

Comments welcome.

Source

  • http://wrightinnovations.net Rob

    I like the concept, but with the security concerns not a good roll out for Google. I would have expected them to see such a bug. PULL IT TOGETHER GOOGLE!

    RLW

  • Pingback: 2010 Winter Olympics Opening Clouded By Athlete Death ~ Chris Pirillo

  • Ryan Farmer

    While not totally on subject, has anyone ever called Windows Live out for letting anyone spam you by letting in out of network invites by default?

    Some quality porn to be stumbled upon when “Ashley” sends you a Windows Live invite. (grin)

  • http://GrowMap.com Gail from GrowMap

    The profiles being built by Google, Yahoo, and other entittes they have absorbed that continually ask for personal information such as names of friends, relatives, teachers, where you grew up, where you went to school etc. are a SERIOUS threat to privacy and freedom.

    Even though my blog is about how to grow businesses and blogs I have an entire category for privacy and datamining and encourage everyone to start paying attention to what is being accumulated on them.

    I strongly recommend selecting the most generic questions and answering them as generally as possible. For example, select “Where did you spend your summers” and answer “at the beach”.

    Speaking of privacy, I am no fan of widgets, plugins and ads that include the names of small towns the way your ad from Pulse360 does. There are many people who have good reason to not have their physical locations revealed including the enormous number of women who have violent ex-whatevers looking for them.

    If they want to include locations in widgets or ads better that they only use the largest metro area and not these small towns. Ads using small towns will not be effective and sound ridiculous anyway because there are no whatever stores you are advertising located in small towns. They ARE usually located in the closest larger city.

  • Pingback: Windows Fanatics