Should All Sales On The Internet Be Taxed?

Posted by on Dec 27, 2009 | 11 Comments

None of us like to pay taxes. In fact I try as much as I can to avoid paying sales tax by ordering items online from companies like Amazon who do not charge a sales tax for my state. But this morning I read an article at the New York Times by Randall Stross in which he questions why Amazon doesn’t collect sales tax, except for 5 states. It seems that companies like Amazon have found a loop hole in the tax code, in which they can avoid having to collect sales tax.

In his article Mr. Stross states this:

Amazon has found a way to put portions of its business into the tax-haven equivalent of reservations. By creating wholly owned subsidiaries for the parts that are treated separately for tax matters, Amazon is under no obligation to collect sales tax. This legal technique is called “entity isolation,” said Michael Mazerov, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington.

By creating subsidiaries the company, even with a presnece in a state, can legally avoid collecting taxes. I must agree this is great for consumers, but takes away needed tax monies from states that desperately need it.

This statement hits home:

Amazon’s in-house counsel should help the company meet its civic obligations — and toss “entity isolation” in the trash can. Amazon’s employees are too scattered, its customer base and its sales too large and the states’ fiscal crisis too grave for it to continue to play tax-avoidance games.

I took a look at the purchases I personally made at Amazon this year and I may have saved about $50 in not having to pay sales tax. But after thinking about it, I believe that the extra $50 when multiplied by the millions who order online could help out the states who are having trouble making ends meet.

But what do you think?  Should Amazon collect sales tax for ALL the states?

Comments welcome.

N.Y. Times article.

  • Buffet

    HELL NO!! I ain’t payin’ no more steenkin’ taxes! Sorry to be so vague. If it weren’t for all the taxes I’m paying to feather the nests of the fat cats, I could afford luxuries like….food.

  • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/ Ron Schenone

    Food? You can afford food? LOL

  • Denny

    … Whats Food and ,
    Yur . E-mail aint Workin Ron

  • Jim

    Oh, of course. We should give the politicians more money to spend. It’s obvious they don’t have enough now.

  • http://www.cookscrafts.com Michelle

    Being a small business thats hurting because people save a few cents going online instead of coming to my shop I’m all for it. When the small shops are gone we will be sorry when we can’t get the service we want. Use it or lose it!

  • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/scribblepinch/ Robert Glen Fogarty

    The way I see it, there should either be sales tax or income tax — but not both. When sales are taxed on income that’s already been taxed, we’re being double-taxed. THAT should be illegal. Heck, it probably isn’t even constitutional!

  • matt

    The problem isn’t “the states who are having trouble making ends meet.” The problem is the people who think the government (federal and state) should be providing the people with free everything. If anyone doesn’t like a competitive capitalistic market system, there are plenty of places for them to go. I hear Cuba is wonderful this time of year. All the states (and feds) need to do is quit trying to buy the votes with their payoffs, ie promises, reduce spending and all our taxes can go down, not up. The problem is not that we are not taxed enough. The problem is that we keep electing dysfunctional shopaholics who use our credit cards to buy the vote.

  • Paul_Bennett

    Put Simply: N-O The internet must be free and affordable and thing we buy online must be free and affordable to people like us not the trillionaires.

    I say, NO MORE TAXES!!!

  • Bruce

    One of the issues confronting Amazon and other internet retailers is the fact taxes would have to be based on local jurisdiction rates, not just state base tax. For example the county I live in charges a different rate than the county next to mine which charges a different rate than the county north to it, etc. etc. I would think the software to keep account of thousands of local tax rates and the number of people needed to run that new tax collection division would be very expensive. And guess where those new costs would get passed onto? Uh, that would be you and me. In effect, another tax.

    How many smaller internet retailers would be forced to shut down from such a forced tax mandate due to the cost of the software and the logistics to send collected taxes off to various jurisdictions? Additionally, when you add purchase cost+shipping+taxes (on total price, not just the cost of goods), I believe a lot of consumers will just hit the “never mind” button, costing the internet retailer a lot of sales.

    I fear sales taxes are the least of our taxing worries in the upcoming years. I do see a simplified tax form in our future, however:
    “How Much Did You Make: $_____
    “How Much in Taxes Did You Pay: $____
    Total Left: $_____
    Send it in!

  • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/ Ron Schenone

    WOW!
    I see we all have a difference of opinions. Thanks to all of you for sharing your thoughts with us. It is appreciated.

    Heh Denny – try it now.

  • Ethan

    How about NO!!! Why do they need even more money from us? Why don’t they spend the money they do get from us more efficiently!?!?! And to stop wasting it all on BS..